Elliott Abrams

Pressure Points

Abrams gives his take on U.S. foreign policy, with special focus on the Middle East and democracy and human rights issues.

Print Print Email Email Share Share Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

Recent Articles on Syria and “Nakba Day”

by Elliott Abrams
May 18, 2011

I’ve written recently on Syria and on the Palestinian “Nakba Day,” in The Weekly Standard.

In an article entitled “The Illusion of Peace With Syria,” I argue that the Obama Administration must realize the only good outcome now is the fall of the Assad regime.

The article concludes that  “The peace agreements that Israel signed with Egypt and Jordan were real achievements, but there will be no such agreements with the Palestinians or with Syria in the foreseeable future. The Palestinians have taken themselves out of the game for now. We cannot turn from them to the Syrians while Assad’s troops are using howitzers and sniper rifles against his people. This is the time not for diplomatic engagement with Assad, but for diplomacy aimed at quarantining his regime and helping bring it down. The White House should dismiss any remaining dreams of a “peace process” with Syria to substitute for the Palestinian version and face facts: There will be no peace with the butcher who rules Syria today.”

In a short piece entitled “How Did this Nakba Day Differ from All Other Nakba Days?” I suggest that the message of Nakba Day is that Israel’s very existence, not its presence in the West Bank, is what the Palestinians cannot accept. As the article  states, “The demand of Nakba Day is that the creation of the state of Israel in 1948 be reversed. When Hamas’s prime minister Ismail Haniyah spoke on Sunday in a Gaza speech, he told the crowd they were demonstrating “with great hope of bringing to an end the Zionist project in Palestine.” And last week Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas said, “We will never give up the right of return.”

Post a Comment 7 Comments

  • Posted by Moshe Sheskin

    Nakba Day, has been with us for quite some time. The question is why is it more forceful today?
    We don’t have to go far to understand the changes in the Middle East. Whether Assad remains or not is not the issue. What will happen in all the Arab countries is the concern. The strength of the Brotherhood and their acceptance by the local population is indeed one of the problems that the free world has to cope with.
    The source, in my opinion, is the weakness of the Americans, led by their President.
    It is obvious that after Obama’s sojourn to Cairo, and the collapse of his dream and promises has shown the entire world that Americas position towards the Arabs is not based on Democracy, on justice but on oil. The American economic problem is another indication of poor management that has not only affected its citizens but has indicated to the Arab world as well that America is not the country that they can count on.
    Eliminate the weakness in American politics and install an administration with the ability to get things done and prove to the world that America is back in the game and you will eliminate much of the problem.

  • Posted by Bilal Alzain

    well said Mr. Abrams,
    i think that the Syrian regime is a real trouble in the peace process in the middle east.

  • Posted by Dean Smallwood

    If a “World-Wide Caliphate” is ever achieved then “World-Wide Nakba Day” will not be far behind . Even today President Obama insists that Israel’s borders return to a pre-1967 configuration . This would necessarily mean giving up the Golan Heights . It’s only a twenty-five minute drive from the Golan to the sea . Not a good situation !

  • Posted by Syria Free

    well said Mr. Abrams,
    i think that the Syrian regime is a real trouble in the peace process in the middle east

  • Posted by hassan

    Thank you for your engagment in the Syrian situation.

    We believe it is important to the region, as well the world to settle Syria into a democratic state. And for the same, the Syrian youth have started ralleying the streets.

    Peace? oppressed nations can not make, nor take peace. Only free nations can do. We can not ask a person who’s not allowed to the very essential rights of living to understand or negotiate about peace

  • Posted by Billie A. Dawson

    you’ve got an incredible weblog right here! would you like to make some invite posts on my blog?

  • Posted by podsłuchy telefonów komórkowych

    I precisely wanted to say thanks once more. I am not sure the things that I might have made to happen without the type of methods contributed by you regarding this problem. It truly was a very alarming dilemma in my opinion, but observing your specialized form you handled the issue took me to leap over contentment. I am just grateful for the work and thus believe you realize what an amazing job that you are providing instructing men and women all through your webblog. I am certain you’ve never got to know all of us.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required