Elliott Abrams

Pressure Points

Abrams gives his take on U.S. foreign policy, with special focus on the Middle East and democracy and human rights issues.

Print Print Email Email Share Share Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

Palestinians at the UN: the Copper Lining

by Elliott Abrams
August 23, 2011

The Palestinian Authority/PLO continues its march toward a UN General Assembly vote on Palestinian statehood. At the least, the Palestinians’ status may be elevated from that of a “non-state entity” observer to a “non-member state” observer.

This development may have very negative consequences. For one thing, the text of the resolution itself may become a problem in future negotiations. If the resolution, for example, declares that the borders of “Palestine” are those of the Jordanian-controlled West Bank as of June 3, 1967 (plus Gaza), negotiating territorial compromises may become even more difficult for Palestinian leaders. How can they give away a part of what the United Nations General Assembly has said is “Palestine?”

It is also possible that violence may result from the UN vote. If the Palestinians decide to begin very large demonstrations (one example: having thousands of protesters surround isolated settlements), no one can be sure whether the Palestinian and Israeli police will in the end be able to control such confrontations without any violence—from Palestinians, settlers, or the police themselves. Even the new head of the Arab League now has his doubts: “The unilateral appeal to the U.N. Security Council and U.N. General Assembly could be a very dangerous move for the Palestinians during this period and I propose that Abbas reconsider the handling of the matter,” said Nabil El Araby.

And American legislators have already predicted that if the PLO goes forward with its plans, Congress will cut off aid to the Palestinian Authority. This assistance is in the hundreds of millions of dollars and will not be easily replaced, for European donors are tapped out and Arab donors are stingy.

These are but a few of the negative repercussions if, as I expect, the Palestinians go forward. President Abbas, the successor of Yasser Arafat but usually a sensible man, may be looking for a legacy in this vote, which theoretically precedes presidential elections in which he will not run and will finally end his long political career. Given the ever-slipping Palestinian election schedules, Abbas may have a long while to go yet as president. But whatever the timing, he should think twice and perhaps remind himself of the immortal lyrics of Groucho Marx about another non-existent country, Freedonia (in the movie Duck Soup): “The last man nearly ruined this place, he didn’t know what to do with it/If you think this country’s bad off now, just wait ’til I get through with it.”

Nevertheless, there is a silver lining or at least a copper lining in a UN General assembly vote on Palestinian statehood, and it is worth noting.

For years now, the Palestinians have opposed Israeli actions—from construction in the settlements to the failure to reach a final status agreement—with the threat of the “one state solution.” This is the threat that Palestinians would seek a unitary state from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea and encompassing all of Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank, wherein Jews would be a minority. Thus would the main goal of Zionism, creation of a Jewish state, be defeated.

President Abbas has made this threat and so have other high-ranking Palestinian officials including chief negotiator Saeb Erekat and former Prime Minister Ahmed Qurei. But the threat is logically gone after the General Assembly vote. By insisting on going forward despite American and substantial European resistance, the Palestinians are committing themselves completely to the two-state solution. Their “gain” at the General Assembly must be viewed as the final, irrevocable commitment to that outcome and should destroy their ability to make their “one-state” threats any longer. It is critical that the United States, Canada, the EU, and all countries committed to peace in the Middle East make this point loudly and clearly now and after the vote.

On balance it would be far better if the Palestinians found some justification for backing away from this foolish, damaging vote. But let us not ignore the single positive factor: when the General Assembly not only declares its support for Palestinian statehood but votes that there IS a Palestinian state, the “one-state solution” must happily die a final death.

Post a Comment 12 Comments

  • Posted by Luke

    Just give them justice. Why does Israel still want to steal their land, kill their children and imprison their menfolk? Isn’t israel satisfied enough with the damage and harm it has caused? Does it just want more death?

  • Posted by canadiansyrian

    this is an irrisponsible decision for the palestinians to take . looking arround them only to see ten palestinian factions + what`s happening in Syria and the current instability in Eygpt and everywhere in the mideast.
    taking the advise of a loser like Nabil Alaraby ( who was satisfied and happy after butcher Assad met him ) is another failure in waiting.

  • Posted by James Hovland

    How can they give away a part of what the United Nations General Assembly has said is “Palestine?”

    Better question… How can Israel give or take what the UN General Assembly has said is “Palestine”? The answer is they can’t, only Palestine can. Is that really a negative consequence the Palestinian leaders should overly concerned about?

    The reason America and Israel reject recognition before negotiations is that recognition is all they have to offer, and Israel want more than is rightfully theirs.

  • Posted by Alex

    Good point, but I wouldn’t say that this removes the specter of a one-state solution from the conflict. The Israeli right has been advocating for exactly such a solution this entire time, and have a much greater ability to follow through on their threats than the Palestinians.

  • Posted by sam

    i don’t know what this guy,the syrian so called canadian is talking about. ok make up your mind,should or should not the plo follow the advice of Alaraby since that’s basically what mr. Abrams is recommending. first it’s an irrisponsible decision,then all of a sudden a failure in waiting.wow, so smart. no wonder we’ve got so much mess in the arab countries. go back to USSR.

  • Posted by Y.

    Neither the Palestinians or Israel have any great record for respecting the UN. Both sides will ignore the non-binding UNGA declaration when they find it inconvenient, and so will their supporters. Therefor, the UNGA vote is irrelevant by itself.

    I suspect the real legacy will not be any would-be UNGA declaration, but more likely the abolition of the Palestinian Authority, as Oslo and the negotiation track have failed. It can happens by self-dissolving (threat made by some influential Palestinians, including Fayyad), popular dissatisfaction (fueled by lack of funds, or disappointment from the UNGA vote changing nothing on the ground, etc. etc.), radical organization taking over (esp. in case major violence erupts), or Israel getting really pissed off (again the case of major violence). What happens after will not be pretty.

  • Posted by Liberty Puckett

    Thanks for this. Helped me alot. Shall be recommending this to my friends.

  • Posted by Kaitlyn Provino

    This is a interesting post by the way. I am going to go ahead and bookmark this article for my sister to read later on tomorrow. Keep up the excellent work.

  • Posted by Vania Shuler

    Thanks for the art, previously interesting and compelling. I have found my way here through Google, I’ll go back one more time :)

  • Posted by Alice Sophia Dow and Mario Roberto Torres

    Wow! There’s a lot of really useful information in this article. The points made in this article are articulate and smart. I enjoyed this reading.

  • Posted by the family

    Good blog! I truly love how it is nice on my eyes it is. I am wondering how I might be notified whenever a new post has been made. I have subscribed to your RSS which may do the trick? Have a nice day!

  • Posted by Stella

    I precisely desired to thank you so much yet again. I am not sure what I might have gone through in the absence of the creative concepts discussed by you directly on this theme. It seemed to be an absolute fearsome concern in my opinion, but discovering this specialized way you managed the issue made me to cry for fulfillment. I’m grateful for this work and in addition trust you find out what a powerful job you are always putting in training many people by way of a blog. Most probably you’ve never got to know all of us.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required