Elliott Abrams

Pressure Points

Abrams gives his take on U.S. foreign policy, with special focus on the Middle East and democracy and human rights issues.

Print Print Email Email Share Share Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

Did President Carter Send Condolences to North Korea?

by Elliott Abrams
December 21, 2011

According to the North Korean news agency, former president Jimmy Carter has sent condolences on the death of Kim Jong-Il.

Here  is the statement the North Koreans issued:

Pyongyang, December 21 (KCNA) — Kim Jong Un, vice-chairman of the Central Military Commission of the Workers’ Party of Korea, received a message of condolences from Jimmy Carter, ex-president of the U.S. on Dec. 19.

In the message Jimmy Carter extended condolences to Kim Jong Un and the Korean people over the demise of leader Kim Jong Il.

He wished Kim Jong Un every success as he assumes his new responsibility of leadership, looking forward to another visit to the DPRK in the future.

Let us hope for a quick denial from president Carter’s office. To express condolences to the people of North Korea over the death of Kim is truly like expressing condolences to the people of Iraq over the death of Saddam Hussein, to Italians over Mussolini, to Libyans over Gadhafi…there are many examples. It may seem impossible, and perhaps Carter sent something but he is being misquoted. And yet…the idea seems plausible as does the notion that Carter would seek to get back there soon and see the new guy.

In May the New York Times reported that there were 200,000 people in North Korean prison camps. One could fill a page just listing the reports on the monstrous nature of the Kim regime–torture, murder, mass executions, abductions, starvation…it does not end. All of which makes it unseemly for the former leader of a great democracy, a man who considers himself a champion of human rights, to express sadness at the passing of the ruling monster. And we must hope he wasn’t wishing the twenty-eight-year-old who just inherited power (or a share of power; we’ll see) “every success” either. Success at what? Maintaining the dictatorship in the family? Keeping those prisons full? Was it impossible to say we all hope North Korea moves toward respect for human rights?

Let’s hope Carter corrects the record. Let’s hope it actually needs correction.

Post a Comment 9 Comments

  • Posted by MethanP

    The only surprise will be if he didn’t do it.

  • Posted by lord garth

    once the spokesperson gets up to speed on this he will pretend that the ‘every success’ phrase means ‘release the prisoners, feed the population, etc.’ and this bs will be taken at face value by all the people who still believe in Jimmy

  • Posted by Rocky

    It is interesting that the communist/socialist management of this blog removed my post without my permission. It is obvious that this organization does not want the citizens of the US to know what kind of stupid ex-president Carter really is. Why doesn’t he get together with them and move to North Korea. He would fit well with the communies there.

  • Posted by Rocky

    There they go again….taking away basic freedom of speech. Go commies at this blog.

  • Posted by Rocky

    Let’s see how long it takes to get this one removed…CARTER for President of North Korea!
    CARTER in 2012!!

  • Posted by Rocky

    Any ex-president who expresses condolences at the death of a murderer of innocent people like Ding Dong Jong did in North Korea should be ashamed and apologize to all true Americans and ask forgiveness of his sin to God! Oop…no god in North Korea!

  • Posted by Dean Smallwood

    If this is true then it’s just another indicator ( as if we needed one ) of why Carter was a one term president and why , today , he is still viewed by many to be a World Class Dunce !

  • Posted by Rob

    Follow up?

  • Posted by ipad 3

    It is certainly a lovely post. An information something like this demonstrates just how steeply the concept is actually thought of by creator.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required

Pingbacks