Elliott Abrams

Pressure Points

Abrams gives his take on U.S. foreign policy, with special focus on the Middle East and democracy and human rights issues.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


What To Do About Egypt

by Elliott Abrams
January 3, 2012

 The bipartisan “Working Group on Egypt,” of which I am a member, has just made public its most recent comment on developments there. The statement is in the form of a letter to Secretary Clinton. The text is as follows:

Dear Secretary Clinton,

We write to express our grave concern about the assault last week by the Egyptian authorities on Egyptian and international civil society groups. These latest actions undermine the already unsteady progress toward democracy in Egypt and raise serious doubts about whether the current military authorities will permit a successful transition from Army rule.

Claims by the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) that it did not order the raids have no credibility. The raids are the culmination of more than six months of steadily increasing harassment of NGOs via the state media, Central Bank, Ministry of International Cooperation, and Ministry of Justice–all of which serve at the pleasure of the SCAF.

The SCAF’s actions go to the heart of what constitutes democracy, that is, not just the casting of ballots on Election Day but the promotion of engaged citizenship and creation of robust institutions of law, fairness, and tolerance. If the SCAF succeeds in its current effort, it will lead Egypt down a path that no American administration can support.

In order to send a clear signal, we strongly urge that provision of all U.S. military aid be suspended immediately until Egyptian military authorities reverse their recent actions and demonstrate their commitment to the democratic process and to permitting human rights groups to conduct their activities without harassment or interference. It is currently impossible for the State Department to certify that “the Government of Egypt is supporting the transition to civilian government including holding free and fair elections; implementing policies to protect freedom of expression, association, and religion, and due process of law,” as stipulated by the Congress in its FY2012 authorization. We also urge that current aid from FY2011 be suspended.

Madam Secretary, in addition to undermining the efforts of international and Egyptian civil society organizations to monitor the democratic process in Egypt, we believe the Egyptian authorities’ actions, including and especially the targeting of three American groups, the National Democratic Institute, the International Republican Institute, and Freedom House, represent a deliberate test of the Obama administration’s commitment to democratic reform in Egypt. If the United States does not respond firmly, this will be read both by the Egyptian authorities, and more importantly, by the Egyptian people as acquiescence to the Egyptian authorities’ assault on civil society and the democratic process.

The United States should use every tool at its disposal to persuade the Egyptian military to stop the assault on democracy and begin a real transition to civilian rule immediately. After a year of conversations with the SCAF by U.S. officials at all levels, it is clear that the message is not getting through; in fact, the SCAF’s behavior and social and economic conditions in the country have deteriorated markedly. Withholding military assistance is the only way to get the SCAF’s attention. The United States simply should not provide assistance to an Egyptian military that treats as criminals other Egyptians who also receive U.S. aid. The United States must show that if the military insists on continuing its disastrous course, it will do so without the support of the U.S. taxpayer.

The punch line comes at the end, when the group urges that aid to the Egyptian military be suspended: “Withholding military assistance is the only way to get the SCAF’s attention. The United States simply should not provide assistance to an Egyptian military that treats as criminals other Egyptians who also receive U.S. aid. The United States must show that if the military insists on continuing its disastrous course, it will do so without the support of the U.S. taxpayer.” This recommendation is not made lightly, and retaining American influence with the Egyptian army is a significant goal. But the military must understand that it is simply impossible, in our democratic system, to continue to send them funds when they punish human rights and democracy promotion groups for receiving U.S. funding. Even if the Obama administration wants to keep the money flowing, it would not be long before Congress insisted that it stop.

As I suggested here, in “Mubarakism Without Mubarak,

Mubarakism was a system that perpetuated military rule and American aid by arguing that the military was the only alternative to the Brotherhood (and groups worse than the Brotherhood) while in fact it created perfect conditions for the Islamists to thrive. We now see the result of those decades of repression and we should reject the invitation to continue the Mubarak system, this time with a collective military leadership replacing the dictator. The struggle for democracy and human rights in Egypt will be long and hard and we cannot determine the outcome, but we must at the very least let all Egyptians know which side we are on. For now, we must let the army know that if it is their policy to crush democracy activists, there is a price they will pay. It’s $1.3 billion a year.

Post a Comment 3 Comments

  • Posted by Ellis Goldberg

    And all along I’ve been thinking I wrote “Mubarakism without Mubarak….”

  • Posted by Hassan

    Mr. Abrams

    As an Egyptian, I would welcome seeing the $1.3B USAID cut. While the Egyptian economy currently suffering and will suffer for years to come, Egyptians overseas will be send more money than the USAID.

    The value of that aid which started in early 1980’s now diminished to nearly nothing, and the real value of such aid is the relationship between US and Egypt.

    Egypt is a sovereign country and any organization that operates within that country must follow the laws of the land. I have no doubt that US authorities will raid any organization that operates in the US unauthorized. Lobbyist in the US operates as companies and adhere to US laws and they must report all of their earnings?

    In contrast to you the US anger over such legal investigation, the US kept increasing its aid to Israel and I think officially it stands around $3B without accounting for tax free donations.

    Threats will not work in the new Egypt, engagement could be better term. I understand the anxiety of the US and its allies of the changes taking place in Egypt. As FP current issues stating that US influence is diminishing, I only can see Egypt and other countries rising regardless of the current messy situation.

  • Posted by Ashraf Rady

    I may agree with Mr. Hassan that Egypt is a soverign country, but this sovereignty should don’t be used as a pretext to violate the very individual basic rights to people, as well as it should be applied to any other foreign countries including Arab Gulf states which pouring money into Salafist and Brotherhood pockets and the authotities and these groups supporters are givibg a blind eyes to these transactions.
    It should be known that the essence of the problem is givibg money to any party, whether givernmental or non-governmental 2thout any level of monitoring by the public, which inevitably lead into courruption and desoptism, whatever the ideology of the government.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required