Elliott Abrams

Pressure Points

Abrams gives his take on U.S. foreign policy, with special focus on the Middle East and democracy and human rights issues.

Print Print Email Email Share Share Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

Does the United States Favor Democracy in El Salvador?

by Elliott Abrams
July 18, 2012

Having undermined democracy in Honduras in 2009 and watched democracy disappear in Nicaragua as the Sandinistas regained power in 2011, it is perhaps not surprising that the Obama administration appears indifferent to the disappearance of democracy in El Salvador. But it is tragic to see the FMLN, the old communist guerrillas’ party, starting to subvert what has been decades of democracy since the Salvadoran civil war ended.

The Washington Post explains the current situation in an editorial:

The FMLN has forged an alliance with splinter parties in the National Assembly and launched a power struggle with the country’s Supreme Court. That a similar battle over the control of Nicaragua’s judiciary accompanied the revival of Daniel Ortega and the Sandinista movement is lost on few in San Salvador.

Leaders of El Salvador’s civil society, business community and Catholic Church … fear that if the FMLN succeeds in subordinating the court it will move to consolidate control over other institutions, including those governing elections. That was the model followed by Mr. Chavez, Mr. Ortega and the leaders of Ecuador and Bolivia.

Leading the charge for the FMLN is El Salvador’s vice president, the former comandante Salvador Sanchez Ceren, who is the FMLN’s 2014 presidential candidate. In March, the opposition ARENA party won the parliamentary elections; the FMLN won only 31 of 84 seats. It looks unlikely, then, that democracy will give the FMLN the power it seeks, which helps explain why the Post fears it will seek power through extra-constitutional means just as Ortega, Chavez, and others have.

What’s the U.S. position? We’re neutral, as the Post describes:

The Obama administration has expressed concern about the political conflict but avoided taking sides. Like the church, it is urging the opposing parties in the National Assembly to negotiate a solution. Even if the current crisis can be defused, however, the FMLN has picked a leader and embarked on a course that threatens El Salvador’s hard-won stability and democracy. Given its close ties to the country, reinforced by the large Salvadoran immigrant population here, the United States has a strong interest in defending the constitutional order.

Indeed we do. We have failed to undertake that task in Honduras or Nicaragua, so there is little reason to think we will do very much in El Salvador. But the Obama administration might then leave office next year having presided over a deep degradation of democracy in Central America. Our new and very capable assistant secretary of state for the region, Roberta Jacobson, sent were what I thought were the wrong signals when she spoke at a press conference on July 12:

This is clearly something that Salvadorans have to resolve, that we have said clearly… I have said it in El Salvador but our Ambassador … has said publicly that we really do urge in the strongest terms possible that the two sides of this dispute really try and come together and resolve it. And I think that’s important. It is a Salvadoran dispute to resolve; it is not ours to opine on how it gets resolved. We would just like to see it resolved.

That’s wrong: We would like to see it resolved in a way that maintains Salvadoran democracy and prevents the FMLN from doing there what has been done in Venezuela and Nicaragua to undermine democracy. When the FMLN acts to subvert Salvadoran institutions, we should say so.

Post a Comment 4 Comments

  • Posted by Travis Schuster

    The F.M.L.N is but one party among many on the left whom have been elected throughout Latin America. We need to remember that the Arena Party on the right was nicknamed the “death squad” government for the priests and nuns with leftward leanings whom were murdered and thrown in mass graves. The fact is the country that is about to become a failed state is Honduras under a right wing government which much like the U.S. lap dog, P.A.N in Mexico has brought their country to its knees after being elected under a coup government after the ouster of the leftist Zalaya. The fact is Nicaragua is going forward in many respects as is El Salvador, while Honduras goes to hell in every respect. Travis

  • Posted by Geoff Thale

    Eliot Abrams’ comments (and those of the Washington Post) misunderstand what’s actually going on in El Salvador. Seeing the country through the lens of geo-politics, and invoking the specter of Daniel Ortega and Hugo Chavez obscures the reality on the ground. All the political parties in El Salvador — right as well as left — have issues with the country’s Supreme Court. The party of the left, the FMLN, and one of the two parties on the right, the GANA party, have formed an alliance to advance their candidates for Supreme Court and attorney general. ARENA, the other party of the right, has another set of candidates. They all have competing, and politically legitimate interests. The important thing is that these interests get worked out in a way that respects the constitution and accepts the independence of the Supreme Court. The role of the U.S. and others ought to be to support a Salvadoran resolution to the conflict, not to polarize it further by casting it as a grand battle between democracy and Chavismo. We have a longer commentary: http://www.wola.org/commentary/tensions_rise_between_el_salvador_s_national_assembly_and_the_supreme_court_understanding

  • Posted by Sam Feldman

    Had the US ever really cared about democracy in any foreign state, it would not have supported Somoza, Pinochet, The Shah if Iran, etc. And it wouldn’t have undermined democracy by supporting abusive rightwing regimes. We even train the Latin American military leaders in torture techniques at Ft. Benning’s School of the Americas. Gimme a break! We even supported the regime that raped nuns.
    The real interest for the US has been economic benefit, it has never been Democracy. And this is true especially in Latin America, but also everywhere else. Check out how we hug the King and Princes of Saudi Arabia.

  • Posted by A

    United States doesn’t care about bananas countries democracy. The only concern of the government of United States is money and the most important commodities of the world ( oil)

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required

Pingbacks