Elliott Abrams

Pressure Points

Abrams gives his take on U.S. foreign policy, with special focus on the Middle East and democracy and human rights issues.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

The Paris Peace Conference

by Elliott Abrams
January 15, 2017

Share

 

Once upon a time, the term “Paris Peace Conference” was a serious one, and referred to the historic Versailles Conference that ended World War I. That conference began on January 18, 1919, and it is striking that the French would wish to make a mockery of their own history by convening a useless conference on almost exactly the same date—today, January 15.

Today nearly 70 countries, and nearly 40 foreign ministers including the one from the United States, are gathering in Paris. Why? Well, why not—from the point of view of the foreign ministers. You do have to sit through an entire day of boring speeches, of course, but then you get the whole weekend in Paris. I’ll bet most arrived Friday for a good dinner, then you have Saturday free for shopping, then another dinner….who would say no merely because the event will be useless or harmful to the cause of peace?

For John Kerry this is his swan song, and he is fresh from Vietnam where he walked down memory lane yet again, at God knows what cost to American taxpayers. But thinking of Kerry should lead us to recall who will be engaged in this event. There is Kerry, who will be unemployed in five days. There is French President Francois Hollande, who has announced he won’t even run for re-election in May. There is Palestinian President Abbas, elected in 2005 for a four year term and now entering his 12th year. And Abbas won’t actually be at the conference, just nearby in some gorgeous hotel suite. Israel is boycotting the conference. No one will represent the new American administration.

What is the point of this endeavor? According to the French, it is to show support for the two-state solution and urge both parties, meaning Israel and the PLO, to negotiate. That is a demonstration of bias, because it is the PLO not Israel that has been refusing negotiations and rejecting peace plans again and again for years—indeed decades. To treat the government of Israel and the PLO as if their desire for peace were identical is wrong and unfair. If the participants at the conference truly wished to advance peace, they would be pressuring the Palestinians to stop rewarding and inciting terrorism by glorifying terrorists, and pressuring them to start negotiating seriously. This will not happen. There is every reason to believe Mr. Abbas will leave Paris satisfied with the circus and feeling zero real pressure to do anything at all.

The other point, perhaps the real point, of the conference is to pressure Israel to stop all settlement growth. In this sense it is a follow-up to UN Security Council resolution 2334 of December, and shares its conclusion that the real barrier to peace is the increasingly rapid, uncontrollable, endless, limitless growth of Israeli settlements. But this is false, as the statistics show. Settlement populations are growing, at about four percent a year, but the notion that they are rapidly gobbling up the West Bank and making peace impossible is a fiction.

There may be a third objective for the conference: pressing President-Elect Trump not to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. We can expect language about leaving Jerusalem as a final status issue and doing nothing at all that changes the status quo. If you believe the President-Elect will be dissuaded by such a declaration from a conference such as this, well, I don’t agree.

So the conference will soon be nearly forgotten, and go down as yet another feeble effort to undermine Israel’s legitimacy. Of course if you ask the French, they will angrily deny that this was their purpose. I agree that it was not the purpose, but it is the effect, predictably. Like Resolution 2334, it is another diplomatic blow against the Jewish State, trying to isolate it and criticize it and undermine its ideological and diplomatic defenses. And meanwhile, this very month, we will see the PLO pay more money to prisoners convicted of terrorist acts and name more schools or parks or squares after murderers and would-be murderers. But there will be no Paris conference about all of that.

 

Post a Comment 7 Comments

  • Posted by Savannah

    How did Israel landed in Palestine? How come that they occupy that place?

  • Posted by hussein

    I finally got it! I understand it now perfectly….

    According all articles posted in this blog during the last 3 months:

    1) All 70 Nations in Paris Conference
    2) All 15 Nations in UN Security Council
    3) All 193 nations in UN General Assembly
    4) All 195 Nations in UNESCO

    Are anti-Israeli, anti- Israel friendly or anti-Semitic, all are planning on Israel’s destruction, wiping it off the world map and hate Jews. Their latest voting records prove that beyond the shadow of a doubt.

    Well, the good news is that, the man, the savior, the messiah, the guardian angel is on the way. The Super Trump is coming in a few days. He will straighten out everything in no time. He will correct the current sick state of world affairs. For all those nations listed above things are not going to be the same anymore!!!

    Get ready for celebration!

  • Posted by Hemaccabe

    Savannah. Israel did not “landed on Palestine,” Palestine landed on Israel. Israel has been the ancestral homeland of the Jewish people since biblical times and has enjoyed a Jewish community uninterrupted since then that has never given up it’s right to a free and independent state. Palestine is a recent invention of the 20th century.

  • Posted by DR.SS

    Who are the descendants of biblical time Jews. Those who dispersed through out the world or those Jews who remained in Palestine, most becoming Christians when Jesus came and later when Islam came to the region they adopted Islamic religion..
    Who are really the true Hebrews.. Those native inhabitants who remained in the land and changed with its times or those who went to Europe and mixed with European inhabitants and now claim their biblical heritage. Perhaps Ancestry DNA should be tested on Palestinians and Jews who came to Palestine from Europe to determine who has the legitimate heritage claim to biblical Palestine..

  • Posted by Dan

    Mr. Abrams, by the look of things the maggots have discovered your site.

  • Posted by Jon Steelman

    perhaps our host needs to exercise “moderation” in allowing postings.

  • Posted by Hussein

    Response to Dan:

    I am glad you have discovered it!

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required

Pingbacks