CFR Presents

Asia Unbound

CFR experts give their take on the cutting-edge issues emerging in Asia today.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


China’s Parallel Universe

by Elizabeth C. Economy
December 8, 2010

Soldier Standing Post in Front of Tiananmen

A soldier stands his post in Tiananmen Square. (Jason Lee/Courtesy Reuters)

Bit by bit we are learning how China manages reality when reality doesn’t conform to Chinese interests: it constructs its own reality.

Some of this is simply smart politics. Chinese leaders don’t believe that the international press gives them a fair shake, so they invest $80 billion to create their own international media outreach with access to 130 news bureaus worldwide and a 24-hour English-language television station. Nothing wrong with this—everyone is free to decide what they do and don’t believe from any media source.

Some of it is simply embarrassing. When China didn’t like the fact that the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to someone sitting in a Chinese jail, it first reverted to reflexive demagoguery, claiming the Peace Prize was part of a U.S.-orchestrated plot. Then Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu mocked the Nobel Committee as “clowns.” All the while, Beijing badgered, hectored and threatened other countries in an effort to prevent them from sending a representative to the Nobel ceremony. They managed to cobble together an odd assortment of ugly regimes and weak neighbors. What they have gained is anybody’s guess. Now Beijing has decided to award its own Confucius Peace Prize to former Taiwanese Vice-president Lien Chan the day before the Nobel Peace Prize. Without debating the merits of Lien as a choice, does Beijing really think that anyone takes this prize as a serious alternative to the Nobel Peace Prize? Maybe someday, but not now when it so clearly is a political gambit to draw attention away from Oslo.

But on occasion, China’s desire to live in an alternative reality is actually dangerous. Providing succor to Pyongyang and blaming the United States and South Korea for North Korea’s aggression undermines both Chinese credibility and, more importantly, stability in East Asia. For China, too, the costs of ignoring reality are growing. The United States, Japan, and South Korea are strengthening their security ties with less and less thought being given to Chinese interests and concerns. Moreover, the six-party talks have almost completely lost their ability to serve as a platform to showcase China’s potential as a regional leader.

Leaders often construct their own reality to manage domestic expectations or build consensus around a leadership priority. China, however, needs to distinguish between constructing an alternative Nobel Peace Prize to try to save face domestically from constructing an alternative world that protects North Korea but endangers the rest of the international community.

Post a Comment 5 Comments

  • Posted by Paul

    Until we know the true nature of Confucious Peace Prize, it remains unclear whether a parallel universe exists in China. Besides, it is yet to see who finds attraction in that award.

  • Posted by Tan

    One finds the same situation in . The Nobel Peace Prize should be awarded to a Vietnamese dissident next year. It’s long overdue!

  • Posted by justrecently

    An assumption that we often hear is that China is most concerned about free shipping lanes, when it comes to East Asian waters. That’s something they can take almost for granted.
    The way Beijing seems to ignore shifting attitudes in Japan and Korea – against China – doesn’t affect their freedom of navigation, and they may therefore not need to be bothered about their bad East Asian press as much as one might first think. At home, it certainly helps to create a siege mentality, and such a mentality will probably stabilize the CCP’s rule. That’s no unlikely priority, is it?

  • Posted by Huang Hsing

    China’s new global news channel is no different to Americas Fox News and Hollywood. I see so much scrutiny on chinas new news channel but see no mention of channels from the States with similar agendas.

  • Posted by Rubadubadoobag

    Funny how you realise the Chinese tendency to construct their own reality without acknowledging your own. Any unbiased observer – by which I dont mean the Western media or your laughable institution – would realise that conducting military exercises outside North Korea’s doorstep is akin to waving your fists in someone’s face.

    Yet this blatant provocation (not to mention showcasing of American arms for sale to S.Korea and other ‘allies’) is called defence of security while similar acts by Russia or China are aggression. Deluded much?

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required