CFR Presents

Asia Unbound

CFR experts give their take on the cutting-edge issues emerging in Asia today.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


Note to China: Why Ai Weiwei Matters to the Rest of the World

by Elizabeth C. Economy
April 11, 2011

Chinese artist Ai Weiwei throws porcelain sunflower seeds into the air as he poses for a photograph with his installation entitled 'Sunflower Seeds', at its unveiling at the Tate Modern gallery, in London on October 11, 2010.

Chinese artist Ai Weiwei throws porcelain sunflower seeds into the air as he poses for a photograph with his installation entitled 'Sunflower Seeds', at its unveiling at the Tate Modern gallery, in London on October 11, 2010. (Stefan Wermuth/Courtesy Reuters)

China’s detention of the artist/activist Ai Weiwei has resulted in an international outcry. Ai is well-known not only for his thought-provoking art—such as the sunflower seed installation at the Tate Modern in London—but also for his “in-your-face” activism on behalf of the 2008 Sichuan earthquake victims. Ai has been working relentlessly over the past few years to develop a comprehensive list of the children who died in the earthquake—something the Chinese government has worked hard to prevent.

Ai has now been detained, ostensibly on the grounds of “economic crimes.” Other reports, however, suggest that a recent art work, in which Ai mocks the Communist Party (warning: graphic), may be to blame for his incarceration. It also has been evident for some time that the Chinese leadership is feeling particularly threatened by dissenting voices in the wake of the revolutions in the Middle East and calls for a “jasmine revolution” in China.

Whatever the reason, the question now remains as to what the rest of the world can do—not just about Ai Weiwei but about all the Chinese who are harassed, detained, and imprisoned because of their push for greater openness. The truth is that the Chinese government doesn’t seem to understand why the rest of the world cares or has any business caring about what happens inside China’s borders.

Typically, outside analysts try to explain to China that what China does at home affects its behavior abroad. We argue that the lack of transparency, rule of law, and official accountability inherent in the Chinese system is an issue not only of domestic but also of international concern. Poor corporate governance at home translates into poor corporate governance abroad. Adding melamine to milk products at home means exporting those same products abroad. Failures in China’s judicial system mean the world’s companies and people can’t rely on Chinese courts for a fair trial. We also note that China’s reputation suffers as a result of thuggish practices. Of course, if we’re honest, many of us simply find it deeply painful to see artists, lawyers, and activists locked up for no other reason than wanting to voice their opinions.

Yet all these arguments have failed to produce real change. We could consider stronger action: cancelling the bilateral Strategic and Economic Dialogue on the grounds that the timing is not propitious. This is eminently doable, but the Chinese don’t really care about the Dialogue. So while it might be a dramatic statement on our end, it is unlikely to produce any real change. Economic sanctions seem unworkable in the face of China’s role in today’s global economy, but perhaps an initiative by multinationals on good governance—training lawyers, supporting civil society, etc.—is doable.

Above all, we should listen to the Chinese people who are engaged in the fight for greater openness. What do they want from the international community? That would seem a good place to start—if only they can have the chance to tell us.

Post a Comment 2 Comments

  • Posted by F. Vorbach M.A.

    Hello – I think the Chinese government understands very well, why at some places in the world people worry about people, who are arrested, because they just openly speak out, what they think. The Chinese government acts this way, because an influential group in China, the so called middle class, is more interested in prosperity than in human rights, and so supports the CCP and the autocratic Chinese political system.

  • Posted by Ben

    When artists leave the safety of aesthetics, their ideas can be dangerous…

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required