CFR Presents

Asia Unbound

CFR experts give their take on the cutting-edge issues emerging in Asia today.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


Sharone Tobias: Why Did China Release an Israeli-Palestinian Peace Plan?

by Guest Blogger for Adam Segal
May 14, 2013

China's President Xi Jinping (R) and his Palestinian counterpart Mahmoud Abbas smile at each other during a signing ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on May 6, 2013. (Courtesy Reuters/Jason Lee) China's President Xi Jinping (R) and his Palestinian counterpart Mahmoud Abbas smile at each other during a signing ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on May 6, 2013. (Courtesy Reuters/Jason Lee)


Sharone Tobias is a Research Associate for Asia Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Beijing traditionally has been wary of involving itself in affairs that do not directly relate to its own security. It has taken a non-interventionalist stand on most international issues, from Iranian nuclear proliferation to genocide in Darfur to the Arab Spring, much to the dissatisfaction of the West. Even when Beijing has engaged in international conflict negotiation–for example, releasing a four-point plan for the Syrian conflict last year–it has been half-hearted and under international pressure. But last week, when both Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (separately) visited China, Xi Jinping surprised everyone by releasing a four-point peace plan for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The plan received much fanfare in the Chinese press, even though it is conservative and unimaginative–it calls for an independent Palestine built along 1967 borders, as most peace plans do. The plan is more notable for its context rather than its content.

There are several reasons why China might want to engage in the peace process now. First, there has been a relative power vacuum in the Middle East. The Obama administration has been markedly less involved in the Israeli-Palestinian peace conflict than George W. Bush. The main reason for this is the obvious distrust between Obama and Netanyahu; however, America’s pivot to Asia also plays a role, as it has put Israel lower on the list of foreign policy priorities. Beijing might see this vacuum as an opportunity to become more involved in a region of vital importance to its energy security.

Second, Chinese relations with many of its neighbors have soured, and international diplomatic initiatives may help China regain some of its international appeal. Only a few years ago, pundits were discussing China’s trade incentives, cultural exchanges, and no-strings-attached aid as part of a “charm offensive;” today, the phrase is all but forgotten, replaced by “belligerence.” As Chinese relations with Japan, South Korea, Southeast Asia, and the United States worsen, it is well worth their while to get involved in a low-stakes diplomatic effort to charm countries further from home. In particular, Beijing might be interested in bettering relations with Persian Gulf countries, at a time when China is ever-more dependent on Middle Eastern oil. Supporting a freeze on Israel’s settlements in the West Bank and an independent Palestinian state is beneficial to China’s image with the public as well as the ruling elite in that region. As the United States moves towards greater energy independence, China now imports nearly half its oil from the Persian Gulf, a number that is likely to rise in the next decade.

Finally, and most importantly, Beijing may be ready at last to give up its national image as the underdog. China has historically viewed itself as a victim of international colonialism and oppression, stemming from what it calls the “one hundred years of humiliation” at the hands of Japan and the West, beginning with the Opium Wars and continuing through the end of World War II. As a pro-Palestine opinion article in the state-run Global Times asserted, “China is no longer a weak country to be bullied by imperialist powers as it was more than a century ago, but an economic and military power capable of claiming what is rightly China’s. This is justice, and China wants to see justice served in the international arena.” Supporting a peace deal could be part of China’s “coming out” as an international power, ready to stand on the world stage alongside the United States as a major diplomatic force. China released its four-point plan on Syria under great international pressure and without much conviction. But this time, China took initiative, with Xi personally announcing the plan, and seemed genuine in its offer to facilitate a meeting between Netanyahu and Abbas on Chinese soil.

The Chinese peace plan is unlikely to take root in any future Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. Abbas thanked Xi for his plan but did not engage further. Netanyahu politely shrugged off the plan in favor of discussing trade issues and Iran; the Israeli government has no incentive to include yet another party in the moribund peace talks, especially one with a history of supporting Palestinian independence groups. But Beijing’s peace plan is still of symbolic significance, representing a shift from victimhood to a country that wants to place a leadership role in issues of global importance far beyond its periphery.

Post a Comment 2 Comments

  • Posted by Hyungwon

    The timing of the release of the four-point peace plan was calculated under the context of changing dynamics in East Asia, as the writer argues.
    I want to elaborate a little more on this.
    First, there was an imminent visit from South Korea’s presidential visit to USA, signifying the 60-year relationship that benefited both nations enormously. Park’s visit was hugely welcomed by the American counterparts and it served as the cornerstone of the new era,solidifying the allies status and representing the long-lasting interests in the region by US. Although later eclipsed by the sex scandal involving one of its government officials, South Korea’s kickstart on foreign relationship under the Park administrations sent a subtle message on China- who was seen as very reluctant in conducting what’s right, for example, getting North Korea to stop its provocative ambitions. China might have sensed that was about to happen and pre-empt the concerns by releasing this plan.

    Second, it seems that it sends a subtle message to Japan, whose administration is eager to modify its post-war constitutions to be able to possess military forces on its own. The aim of the peace plan is to make sure that two parties, Israeli and Palestinian, do not engage in violence and other acts that harm the citizens of the regions. Once succumbed to the Japanese imperialism, China knows what it feels like to be in constant embroilments. Japanese attempts in re-militarizing are increasingly reminding China of its traumatic memories and China does not want to see that happening. Add to the fact that China, with its full grip by Communist party, seeks to become a regional player that dwarfs the size of Japan. Releasing a four-point plan, therefore, constitutes a moral stronghold to which China can refer to in times of future Japanese modification of constitutions.

  • Posted by Sam

    Of the three reasons given (power vacuum, global image, shift from victim-hood to great power) for last week’s visits to China by Abbas/Netanyahu, none moves beyond accepted conventional wisdom. The real reason China ‘released’ a ‘peace-plan’ was to provide cover for the week-long strategic dialogue between Beijing and Jerusalem, the same reason Abbas was in China to begin with. For further support for this analysis, see the article here:

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required