CFR Presents

Asia Unbound

CFR experts give their take on the cutting-edge issues emerging in Asia today.

Print Print Email Email Share Share Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

China’s New Small Leading Group on Cybersecurity and Internet Management

by Adam Segal
February 27, 2014

China's Politburo Standing Committee member Liu Yunshan (R ) and China's Vice Premier Li Keqiang attend the opening ceremony of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on March 3, 2013. (Jason Lee/Courtesy Reuters) China's Politburo Standing Committee member Liu Yunshan (R ) and China's Vice Premier Li Keqiang attend the opening ceremony of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on March 3, 2013. (Jason Lee/Courtesy Reuters)

China announced the first meeting of a leading group on Internet security and informatization earlier today. The group is chaired by President Xi Jinping, while Premier Li Keqiang and Liu Yunshan, a member of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau and the director of the Propaganda Department, serve as the group’s deputies. There have been reports of a leading small group on cyber issues meeting in the past, but this is the first public meeting in at least four years. The announcement of this new group is significant.

But you wouldn’t know that from the official reports on the meeting. They cover well-trod ground: the Internet is critical to China’s economic development, national security, and the management of public opinion; without good security, all of these things are threatened; China is one of the biggest victims of cyberattacks; and, like Russia, Germany, and the United States, it must develop a national cybersecurity strategy. There is also a great deal of attention paid to indigenous innovation, the need for greater research and training of new talent, and efforts to promote Chinese technology companies. Nothing in the news coverage suggests that the recent pressure on Western technology companies will get worse, but nothing suggests it will get better either.

Still, a group at this level signals a high level of concern and interest. What motivated the formation of the group? First, there has been a growing chorus call for China to better coordinate its Internet security policies. From the outside, we tend to see the Chinese policy process as strategic and driven from the center, but in fact it is highly contested and fragmented. At least six different agencies and ministries–the Ministry of Public Security, State Encryption Bureau, State Secrets Bureau, Ministry of State Security, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, and People’s Liberation Army–have input on cybersecurity policy. The announcement of the small group raises the issue much higher on the policy agenda, and brings the attention of top leadership. It also means that stand-offs between competing groups can be resolved and policy moved forward.

Second, at the same time as the Snowden revelations have stalled U.S. efforts to pressure China on cyber economic espionage, the international environment is rapidly changing. Countries like Japan and Korea are developing new offensive and defensive cyber capabilities. Brazil is hosting an international conference on Internet governance and the European Commission has called for “concrete and actionable steps” to globalize essential Internet functions. Beijing is worried that it is not doing enough to promote its vision of how cyberspace should be managed.

Third, leadership politics are most likely also involved. Xi Jinping has not been shy about consolidating power. We will, of course, have to wait and see how the leading group develops. But this is another high profile issue Xi seems determined to put a stamp on as he tries to make China a “strong network country.”

Post a Comment No Comments

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required

Pingbacks