CFR Presents

Asia Unbound

CFR experts give their take on the cutting-edge issues emerging in Asia today.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

Podcast: Human Rights in the Shadows of Authoritarianism

by Elizabeth C. Economy
April 19, 2017

Beijing-police-camera A policeman makes a recording of a journalist during lawyer Pu Zhiqiang’s verdict outside the second intermediate people’s court of Beijing on December 22, 2015. (Adam Rose/Reuters)

Share

Who and what define a human right? And when rights are violated, what recourse do citizens have to seek redress? On this week’s Asia Unbound podcast, Eva Pils, reader in transnational law at King’s College London, visiting professor at Columbia Law School, and author of the forthcoming book Human Rights in China: A Social Practice in the Shadows of Authoritarianism, offers a detailed overview of the state of human rights in China. Pils identifies an inherent contradiction between many lawyers’ broad definition of human rights—norms that protect people against abuses—and that of the Chinese party-state, which prioritizes socioeconomic rights. In addition, when people’s rights are abused, Chinese courts are often either too weak to defend constitutional liberties or unwilling to uphold legal arguments in the face of politics. The inscrutable shuanggui system of Communist party justice, which spirits away officials for detention, interrogation, and sometimes even torture, offers even less in terms of legal protections. But Chinese citizens are not without their own outlets for pursuing justice. As Pils describes, they turn to WeChat to find solidarity among others marginalized by the state and spill into the streets to protest injustices within their communities. For more of Pils’s insights as to how human rights have changed under Xi Jinping and how liberal democracies can respond, listen to our conversation below.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required