John Campbell

Africa in Transition

Campbell tracks political and security developments across sub-Saharan Africa.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


Nigeria’s Polarizing Politics

by John Campbell
December 8, 2010

Last week as I mentioned here it looked like the Atiku Abubakar consensus candidacy would stick. Now I’m not so sure.  One of the most important northern power brokers and Abubakar rival, former military dictator Ibrahim Babangida is now threatening to bolt the ruling party. Whether Babangida remains in the party or not, the stage is now set for a potentially polarizing contest that may split the party along the country’s already existing regional and religious cleavages.

Up to now, power sharing within the dominant PDP promoted elite unity and national stability in a country divided into hundreds of ethnic groups and between Christianity and Islam, which are nearly equal in size. Under ‘zoning’ the PDP’s presidential candidate alternated every two terms between the predominately Christian South and Muslim North. If the party’s presidential candidate was Christian, the vice presidential candidate was Muslim, and vice versa. The country’s elite then ensured that the PDP candidate was rigged into office. Because the last president, Northern Muslim Umaru Yar’Adua died in his third year in office, many in the North believe it is still their turn to hold the presidency.

Hence the Northern chagrin that Jonathan’s candidacy violates ‘zoning.’  Some Northern powerbrokers, meeting in the Northern Political Leaders Forum, sought Northern elite agreement on a candidate to oppose him. Former military dictator Ibrahim Babangida, former National Security Advisor and retired general Aliyu Mohammed Gusau and Kwara state governor Bukola Saraki were Atiku Abubakar’s leading rivals. Initially, all Abubakar’s rivals appeared to fall in behind the Forum’s choice. However, there are press reports that Abubakar won the forum polling by a single vote and Babangida’s threat to leave the PDP raises questions as to whether he will accept the Forum decision.

For the sake of stability, Nigerian powerbrokers have sought to keep ethnic and religious rivalries out of presidential politics. However, where religious, ethnic and economic boundaries coincide, violence occasionally occurs.  For example, in Plateau state bloody conflict has become endemic between Muslim, Hausa Fulani cattle herders and Christian, Barom farmers.  The fear is that politicians will exploit these rivalries, which could trigger more conflict. Already, there are credible reports that Goodluck Jonathan’s supporters are attempting to build support with appeals to religious solidarity, especially among the Christian minority in the North.  Though Atiku Abubakar himself will not play tit for tat with similar appeals to Muslims, the same cannot be said for all Northern powerbrokers. If the presidential campaign involves extensive appeals to ethnic and religious identities, there is the prospect of higher levels of ethnic and religious violence as the party’s primary and Election Day approach.

For a bit of background on the elections, watch this video I made with

(Photo: Luc Gnago/courtesy Reuters)

Post a Comment 3 Comments

  • Posted by Ed Leventhal

    Recent posts have been very effective in providing a comprehensive overview of the Nigerian pre-election environment. It seems clear that the risks of something short of a completely peaceful process have gone up. In that light, in a worst case scenario (or, at least a bad case scenario) how likely would it be for Nigerian oil exports to be meaningfully interrupted?
    (Recent data indicate that Nigeria is high (#2) on the list of countries from which the US imports oil).

  • Posted by John Campbell

    Even under the worse scenarios nobody wants to kill the goose that lays the golden egg. But accidents happen. If there is an acceleration of violence in the Delta with increased attacks on the oil and natural gas infrastructure to bring pressure on the government, then oil production will decline, as has happened in the past. At present, uncertainly generated by the proposed Petroleum Industry Bill has also lead to a slow down in investment in the future productive capacity of the industry.

  • Posted by olusola Akande

    The myriad of problems facing Nigeria today are caused by the elites who have mismanaged the country since independence. The elites and military politicians have continued to sabotaged the well intention of some reform minded Nigerians. Why will a disgraced ex military ruler will want to rule a country that he nearly destroyed by annuling the election in 1992? It is a disgrace to all of us that want a better Nigeria, but as usual the same inepts and selfish people will clamor for office which they no nothing about but to loot and siphon the resources of the nation for personal gain. What are the gain of democracy for Nigerian people? Since the return of civilian rule, the nation standard of living has fallen to the lowest level while the politicians and the bureaucracy that supported them have continued to spend public money like it is there money. A change is coming that will eliminate these people from governing, they are the reasons why the country progress is stunted. They will not build the country up but destroyed it for selfish interests.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required