
Supporters of opposition UDPS leader Etienne Tshisekedi gather in Democratic Republic of Congo's capital Kinshasa, December 23, 2011. (Stringer/Courtesy Reuters)
This is a guest post by University of Wisconsin-Madison professor emeritus M. Crawford Young.
The statement is often made that the 2006 and 2011 were Congo’s first since 1960. There is a collective amnesia concerning the relatively acceptably conducted national elections in 1965, carried out under the provisions of a new constitution completed in Kananga in mid-1964, and approved by referendum (with North Katanga and a few territories still occupied by rebels and not voting). By late spring 1965, the rebellions were mostly over, and balloting occurred nation-wide for national and provincial assemblies. Some 223 parties competed, linked in two broad (and loose) alliances, one tied to then PM Moise Tshombe, and the other linked to President Joseph Kasavubu. A parliamentary impasse resulted, creating the pretext for the November 1965 Mobutu coup.
Particularly noteworthy is the fact that the elections were entirely conducted by the Congolese; the UN operation ended in mid-1964. Not only did this measure the far greater capacities of the Congo state at the time, but also the degree of infrastructural decay since; it was still possible to move around the country in 1965. None of the accounts of the elections mention a cost factor; they certainly did not require anything remotely resembling the reported $700 million for the much less credible 2011 version.
For detail, see especially the invaluable yearbook of Congo developments, “Congo 1965″ (Brussels: CRISP, 1966). The Young-Turner volume, “The Rise and Decline of the Zairian State,” has a brief account (pp. 49-51).




Oh Yes! This is a piece of a true Congo story, which the Congo detractors do not want to tell, though it is consigned in some documents.
The Congolese struggle is against the Belgium obsessed pretence to control, dominate, possess and divide this vast territory, with a size 80 times the entire Belgium. The Belgian obsession is based on the fear of losing economic interests and colonial prestige; though they have used all sorts of alliances and with all sorts of people and agents, including the less morally and economically correct, to secure these interests in DRC. In this sad and astute role, they brought with them the United States, France and the rest of Europe
But Belgians and their blinded allies will need to understand that colonialism ended long-time. They need to realize that the configuration of the world market is rapidly changing the entire traditional order and new non negligible economic dragons can no more be stopped. They have to admit that Congo must set its development motion and take care of its own people, while playing its international role of contributing to the stabilisation of world market
Hence the need to end the current ruling of Congo by international mafia cartels, through their puppet President Kabila and his boys. Hence the need to establish a stable and strong democratic State-Nation, which will promote a strong partnership with strategic international allies, the USA, Europe, the BRICS etc.
Visionary world leaders should take this opportunity to promote such program with a more reliable government, drawn from a totally new spirited leadership, instead of supporting either of the actors of the current Congo crisis or the traditional third Path.
CAFIDA Members
Amélie and Daniel
CAFIDA (Conscience Action Forum of Initiatives in the Development of Africa)
As a foreigner, i don’t really care who wins the elections, but i love the activities around it