John Campbell

Africa in Transition

Campbell tracks political and security developments across sub-Saharan Africa.

Print Print Email Email Share Share Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

South Sudan-Kenya Oil Pipeline in the Works

by John Campbell
January 27, 2012

South Sudanese express their support as President Salva Kiir (not pictured) declared a halt on all oil operations in South Sudan, in Juba January 23, 2012. (Handout/Courtesy Reuters) South Sudanese express their support as President Salva Kiir (not pictured) declared a halt on all oil operations in South Sudan, in Juba January 23, 2012. (Handout/Courtesy Reuters)

An unresolved issue between Juba and Khartoum has been how to divide the revenue from oil that is essential to the finance of both South Sudan and Khartoum. According to the press, South Sudan is now producing 470,000 barrels of oil per day. But the infrastructure and principal port for its export is in Sudan. The two governments have not been able to reach agreement on fees, tolls and other payments that Juba would make. The South Sudan government alleges that Khartoum has seized up to $815 million worth of oil.  This week Juba announced that it will stop exporting oil stop exporting oil through Sudan, even as talks continue. South Sudan president Kiir and Sudan president al-Bashir are supposed to meet today.

Given these hang-ups, many in South Sudan have sought an alternative export route for their oil. And maybe they have found one. On January 25 South Sudan and Kenya announced an agreement whereby Juba would construct an oil pipeline and a fiber optics cable from its oil fields to the Kenyan port of Lamu. While the pipeline would be owned by Juba, it would pay fees to the Nairobi government. For Kenya, the pipeline would be part of an elaborate infrastructure development program that would include railways, super highways, airports, and tourist resorts as well as new port facilities at Lamu.

Some may see the agreement as part of Juba’s effort to pressure Khartoum. But, given the host of unresolved issues between Sudan and South Sudan, including border disputes that are resulting in low-level warfare, the political arguments for Juba to acquire a new outlet to the sea appear to be strong. It remains to be seen how the pipeline will be financed or how long it will take to build it. But, even in the unlikely event that Juba and Khartoum reach an oil agreement today or tomorrow, the construction of the pipeline will probably proceed.

Post a Comment 2 Comments

  • Posted by Herman J. Cohen

    Financing for the South Sudan-Kenya pipeline will be easy, considering the price of the product that will be going through it.

  • Posted by John P. Causey, IV

    At Davos, several African leaders urged more cooperation on energy and infrastructure projects. The leaders voiced opposition to the infighting, and expressed a desire to centralize these decisions. By doing so, they hope to increase intra-African trade, which at present, is negligible.

    We in the West should view these issues with humility, as we ourselves struggle with the politics of oil pipelines. The most recent flareup being the Keystone Pipeline controversy between Canada, the US and (partially) China.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required