John Campbell

Africa in Transition

Campbell tracks political and security developments across sub-Saharan Africa.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


Costas Vaxevanis and Nuhu Ribadu—Birds of a Feather

by Guest Blogger for John Campbell
November 15, 2012

Greek editor Costas Vaxevanis waits outside a courthouse in Athens. 11/01/2012 Greek editor Costas Vaxevanis waits outside a courthouse in Athens. 11/01/2012 (Yorgos Karahalis/Courtesy Reuteres)


This is a guest post by Jim Sanders, a career, now retired, West Africa watcher for various federal agencies. The views expressed below are his personal views and do not reflect those of his former employers.

Greek journalist Costas Vaxevanis recently escaped judicial sanction when the judge in an Athens court “found that Mr. Vaxevanis had acted in the public interest when he published the ‘Lagarde’ list—a document containing the names of two thousand Greeks with Swiss bank accounts—in Hot Doc, the magazine he edits.”

Observes the Financial Times: “impoverished Greeks are becoming ever more resentful of the ability of the elite to escape paying their dues.” According to Vaxevanis, “it was the first time that the names of Greek account holders abroad had been published, so there was tremendous interest in finding out who they really were—the top tier of Greek business and society.”

Around the time of this Greek drama, in Nigeria, a report from the Petroleum Revenue Special Task Force, chaired by Nuhu Ribabdu, similarly heightened stress among political elites. Ribabdu is the former head of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

According to Reuters, Ribadu’s report “showed Nigeria had lost tens of billions of dollars in cut-priced deals struck between government officials, the state oil firm, and multinational oil companies over the last decade.” And it “found hundreds of millions of dollars of oil bonuses and royalties paid to the government were missing.”

Reacting to the report, the Nigeria’s Ministry of Petroleum stated that Ribadu’s committee was not intended to be a “probe panel” or “commission of enquiry,” therefore “nobody or institution was indicted as nobody was on trial.” The presidency denied a possible cover-up of the report.

Vaxevanis and Ribadu represent twenty-first-century muckrakers whose work is exposing the persistence of long-term patterns of elite corruption corroding governance in both countries. That these patterns persist despite their efforts to “name-and-shame” is often attributed to a lack of political will, usually among the so-called political class.

But as has been suggested in other contexts, to be effective, political will cannot be confined simply to courageous journalists and former government officials. Broad-based collaboration among government (all branches), foreign and domestic business, civil society, and ordinary citizens is needed.

In Greece, Vaxevanis received support from the courts; whereas Ribadu, in Nigeria, appears to have less government backing. But political will in both cases is spotty. Meanwhile, the murder of Guinea’s Treasury head Aissatou Boiro, who was investigating missing state funds, evidences strong political will among those wishing to maintain “business-as-usual.”

Post a Comment 3 Comments

  • Posted by John Ojeah


    Another appropriate title is ‘JOSEPH McCARTHY AND NUHU RIBADU – BIRDS OF A FEATHER’.

    Ribadu is also fond of accusing people without evidence.

  • Posted by Ioannis

    Dear Jim and John,

    Vaxevanis seems to represent political goals of the former governemnt members who have now joined the opposition and wish to overthrow the government. On the other hand Ribadu is a politician. I believe that his case is different.

  • Posted by Zainab

    Just wondering, let’s assume the Ribadu report is somehow “discredited” and thrown out the window. What next then? Will another Commission of Inquiry be set up? Another Committee to investigate fraud in the oil sector? Will another Special Task Force be convened with precious time and financial resources dedicated to do the same job several other committees have done? How many more committees and reports does the government need to start cleaning up the oil sector?

    Every day new indices are released placing Nigeria at a lower rank than previously: think the Mo Ibrahim Governance Index, the KPMG report citing Nigeria as having the highest number of fraud incidents, the Corruptions Perceptions Index etc.

    At some point, the government will just need to buckle up and start doing the right thing, even if its a veneer of “reforms”, and creating a vicious cycle of committees in certainly not it.

    Interesting times…

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required