John Campbell

Africa in Transition

Campbell tracks political and security developments across sub-Saharan Africa.

Print Print Email Email Share Share Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

Jumping to Conclusions About the U.S. Military Presence in Niger

by John Campbell
January 30, 2013

Undated file photo courtesy of the U.S. Navy shows a RQ-4 Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle conducting tests over Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland. (Erik Hildebrandt/Courtesy Reuters) Undated file photo courtesy of the U.S. Navy shows a RQ-4 Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle conducting tests over Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland. (Erik Hildebrandt/Courtesy Reuters)

There has been press speculation that the United States is going to establish a drone base in Niger. They claim that the drones would initially be for surveillance, but they could later be armed.

A drone base in Niger would represent a significant shift in the Obama administration’s policy toward the region, which has previously emphasized partnerships with African governments and military training over the presence of U.S. facilities or troops on the ground.

Is there reality behind the headlines? Niger’s president Mahamadou Issoufou says he wants a closer security relationship with the United States. To that end, the United States and Niger signed a status-of-forces agreement (SOFA) on January 28, 2013. Such an agreement is a legal and technical document, and a common first step to a closer security relationship. Among other things it grants immunity from domestic laws to U.S. military personnel stationed in the country. Such an agreement is necessary were the larger military presence required by drones to be established at a later date. But a SOFA–in and of itself–does not necessarily imply that drones will be stationed there or even that the U.S. military presence will increase.  The U.S. has SOFAs with twenty-two countries in sub-Saharan Africa.

A drone base would require a significant number of support personnel, active-duty military, contract, or both.  The spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of State has reiterated that there are no plans to commit U.S. troops to Mali: she is quoted as saying, “the U.S. military is not going to be engaged in combat operations in Mali, and we don’t expect U.S. forces to become directly involved on the ground in combat either.” It is true that a drone base in Niger would not constitute U.S. “boots on the ground” in Mali.  But, it certainly would be close–and the distinction between the U.S. military in Niger focused on Mali rather than in Mali itself would be largely lost by most West Africans—and on most Americans.

This SOFA was on the table for over a year before the French intervention into Mali, and should not immediately be considered a result of the current crisis.

Post a Comment 1 Comment

  • Posted by Chike Chukudebelu

    There are few administrations as trigger happy as Obama’s and based on the experience in East Africa, Pakistan and Yemen, those drones will be firing missiles in Niger, Northern Nigeria, Mali and Libya in the not too distant future.

    That should not obscure us from the main issue: the US has not had a coherent strategy for Africa since the 60′s. It has oscillated from Cold War rivalry, to IMF/World Bank led “structural adjustment” to NGO/aid driven grandstanding to oil, rivalry with China & counter-terrorism.

    The US has no real desire to partner with African nations to solve critical economic problems & build infrastructure – this is what the Chinese are doing (for their selfish interests), but they will still reap the benefits.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required

Pingbacks