John Campbell

Africa in Transition

Campbell tracks political and security developments across sub-Saharan Africa.

Print Print Email Email Share Share Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

U.S. Nigeria Relations and the State of Emergency

by Guest Blogger for John Campbell
June 4, 2013

A poster advertising for the search of Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau is pasted on a wall in Baga village on the outskirts of Maiduguri, in the north-eastern state of Borno May 13, 2013. (Tim Cocks/Courtesy Reuters) A poster advertising for the search of Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau is pasted on a wall in Baga village on the outskirts of Maiduguri, in the north-eastern state of Borno May 13, 2013. (Tim Cocks/Courtesy Reuters)

This is a guest post by Jacob Zenn, an analyst of African Affairs for the Washington D.C.-based think tank, The Jamestown Foundation, and a contributor for the West Point CTC Sentinel.

After Boko Haram launched major attacks on the rural border towns of Baga, Monguno, Bama, and Marte in Borno State, in April and May, Nigerian president Goodluck Jonathan declared a state of emergency in Borno and neighboring Adamawa and Yobe states on May 14, 2013. Soon after, more than two thousand Nigerian troops were deployed to Borno, which shares borders with Cameroon, Chad, and Niger.

Despite hype about the “massive troop deployment,” so far the operation seems rather restrained. The Nigerian army, which often over-reports its successes and under-reports its casualties, claims to have arrested only about one hundred Boko Haram militants in the first two weeks of the operation—a relatively low number compared to the several thousand Boko Haram members in the region. Information is hard to obtain from Borno because the government shut down cell phone service; there have been few reports of extra-judicial killings like in July 2009, when Boko Haram founder Muhammad Yusuf and a thousand other members were killed by the security forces. However, there have been contrasting narratives to government reports about defeating Boko Haram and avoiding civilian casualties.

It is in the interest of the United States, which offered Nigeria security assistance to combat Boko Haram in 2012 and provided border surveillance equipment in 2013, that Nigeria carry out an effective and lawful counter-insurgency campaign. As Secretary of State Kerry said on May 17, human rights violations could “escalate the violence and fuel extremism.” In my opinion, it could also damage U.S. AFRICOM’s “still undefined” future role and reputation in Africa because of AFRICOM’s assistance to the Nigerian military.

In addition, the United States is already a main part of Boko Haram’s anti-secular, anti-Christian, anti-democracy, and anti-Western narrative, which Abubakar Shekau briefly describes in a rare English diatribe at 19:30 in a video from January 2012. Shekau has also called President Obama a “terrorist in the afterlife,” promised America that “jihad has begun,” and mentioned the United States more than any other country. This is likely because of the large U.S. influence in the country, from “Nollywood” to democracy and presidential elections “patterned” after the U.S model. U.S. interests could face additional threats in West Africa if the United States is associated with abuses of its allies.

On June 3, the United States announced a U.S. $7 million reward for Shekau’s location. This is more money than for Mokhtar Belmokhtar or Oumar Ould Hamaha, whose respective groups, “Signatories in Blood” and Movement for Unity and Jihad in West Africa, jointly claimed responsibility for attacks in Arlit and Agadez, Niger on May 23. There are also rumors in Nigeria that the United States is seeking to eliminate Shekau in a drone strike from its new base in Niger. Meanwhile, Boko Haram members carried out an attack on prison guards in Niamey, Niger on June 2, but failed to escape.

The United States is becoming closely involved operationally–and in terms of local perceptions–to the regional security architecture in Nigeria and West Africa. As such, the U.S. strategic footprint in Africa is going to be tied to the actions of its older strategic partners, such as Nigeria, and newer allies, such as Niger.

Post a Comment 2 Comments

  • Posted by Nergui

    I think I’d disagree with calling the U.S. a “main” part of BH’s narrative. Yes, Shekau has mentioned the U.S. and Obama on occasion, but it’s main narratives are very local (perceived historical abuses against Muslims in Middle Belt regions perpetrated by Christians, justice for killed members, implementation of a stricter form of shariah,etc.).

  • Posted by Chike

    Please the US should do what it thinks is right and stop worrying whether Boko Haram (or its sympathisers) “will like it or not”.

    We passed that stage A LONG TIME AGO, 3,000 Nigerians (Muslims & Christians) have been killed by these murderous terrorists – this isn’t the time to “try to please” anyone.

    Secondly, it sounds disingenuous to put a $7 million bounty on the head of an individual, yet refuse to designate the organisation he heads a “terrorist organisation” – once again we’ve passed that stage and the US needs to stand for something.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required

Pingbacks