John Campbell

Africa in Transition

Campbell tracks political and security developments across sub-Saharan Africa.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


Tracking the Traffickers: A More Comprehensive Anti-Poaching Approach

by Guest Blogger for John Campbell
November 22, 2013

Ryan Yetter, a federal wildlife officer with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service stands guard next to a huge pile of confiscated elephant tusks, before 6 tons of ivory was crushed, in Denver, Colorado November 14, 2013. (Rick Wilking/Courtesy Reuters)


This is a guest post by Emily Mellgard, research associate for the Council on Foreign Relations Africa Studies program.

In the fight to save Africa’s wildlife and stem the tide of senseless slaughter for profit, awareness campaigns across the globe are as crucial as more boots on the ground in the game reserves and parks.

Many consumers of ivory, rhino horn, and other wildlife products –such as tiger parts– do not know deadly supply chain through which ivory comes to be in shops around the world, or don’t care. One Chinese government worker interviewed for a New York Times article in March this year commented that: “As long as the quality of the ivory is good, who cares what happened to the elephant.” But this is not just an African or an Asian issue. The United States after all, remains the third largest market for trafficked wildlife.

There is a great need, not only for enhanced and tightened anti-poaching efforts, but for much greater popular awareness of the monstrous fate of the wildlife being “harvested.” If demand falls, so too will profit, and therefore motivation for poaching.

Organized crime, insurgents, terror groups, and  independent “entrepreneurs” are targeting the elephants and other African wildlife because it is profitable. If profits die out, they will move on. This wildlife crisis is market driven, rather than ideological.

The Philippines in June this year, became the first non-African nation to destroy their ivory stockpile. The United States has also begun to embrace a comprehensive approach in its recent anti-poaching and trafficking policies. In a highly public display in Colorado on November 14, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service destroyed its six ton stockpile of confiscated ivory. They also invited other countries to follow their example.

President Obama issued an Executive Order on July 1, 2013 that establishes enhanced legal and judicial steps against poaching. It also provides for U.S. “technical and financial assistance… where appropriate.” He also established a Presidential Task Force on Wildlife Trafficking and tasked it with developing and implementing a National Strategy for Combating Wildlife Trafficking.

Former secretary of state, Hillary Clinton and her daughter Chelsea Clinton in September launched a U.S. $80 million anti-poaching plan at the Clinton Global Initiative. This is Hillary Clinton’s first major initiative since she stepped down as secretary of state at the beginning of 2013.

While such public efforts and initiatives are important in the fight to save the elephants, and other targeted wildlife, to be most effective they should target each link in the poaching and trafficking chain. The Clintons’ initiative concentrates on poaching prevention and prosecution. There also remains a need to concentrate on raising awareness of the consequences of the carnage that poaching and trafficking wreck on the wildlife populations. There are reports that Hollywood stars Leonardo DiCaprio, Tom Hardy, and Tobey Maguire are collaborating on an anti-poaching movie. That would be a highly positive step.

Awareness campaigns run in China (the largest end market for ivory) are showing some progress in sensitizing people against participating in the wildlife trafficking market. Such awareness raising campaigns would likely go a long way to decreasing American demand for wildlife products as well.

Post a Comment 3 Comments

  • Posted by Chike

    No Hollywood celebrity or Western politician can solve this problem – look at Africa’s demographics & rising living standards in the Far East.

    Young Africans don’t have jobs – am sorry, most of those elephants will be killed off for ivory. People will rather sell ivory than starve.

  • Posted by John

    The recent closure of Botswanna to sport hunting is short sighted. Allowing a few elephants to be taken as trophies pays for enforcement of laws and gives the local people an incentive to report and cooperate with keeping poachers at bay. You can protest all you want but you need $$$ for enforcement. In the US there were less dear at the turn of the 20th century than nowl Conservation thru sport hunting works. Unless they change, the elephants in Botswanna are doomed. Look what happened to Kenya in the 70’s.. Tanzania is in much better shape. The american bison was almost extinct, now it is triving . Lots of bad press for Trumps son on that elephant hunt but how many did his game fee save!!!!

  • Posted by Woolrich Vest Donne

    adiq tak minta banyak dari abang, hembusan nafas berat dilepaskan,” tanpa rasa takut aku balas balik apa yang dia kata kat aku.” katanya pada ku. Dia rindukan panggilan Umi oleh anak-anak. kenapalah abang pergi dulu. Cepat-cepat Tini mengangkat kakinya dan bergegas menuju ke kereta yang di letakkan di seberang jalan.“Nak beli buku ke baca buku.? Along kirimkan dulu BBM dia dekat email Nis.Macammana. Saya malas lagi nak fikir pasal jodoh ni.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required