John Campbell

Africa in Transition

Campbell tracks political and security developments across sub-Saharan Africa.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan Stonewalls on Security Service Human Rights Abuses

by John Campbell
May 21, 2014

French President Francois Hollande (R) welcomes Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan as he arrives to attend the African Security Summit at the Elysee Palace in Paris, May 17, 2014. (Gonzalo Fuentes/Courtesy Reuters)


President Jonathan delivered an important speech at the “Regional Summit on Security in Nigeria” held in Paris on May 17, 2014. Its worth a close reading because if provides the Jonathan administration’s “narrative” on Boko Haram, international terrorism, and the school girl kidnapping.

Predictably, President Jonathan firmly places the Boko Haram insurgency in “the new frontier of the global war of terrorism…” narrative. He says that Boko Haram “…is not anymore a challenge to Nigeria alone; it is a threat to each and every one of us in this room.” Yet, only weeks ago the Nigerian government was claiming that Boko Hram was marginalized in the far northeast of Nigeria. Jonathan in fact made reference to the Chibok schoolgirl kidnapping only two weeks after the event. Early on, military spokesmen falsely claimed to have rescued most of the girls. According to Nigerian media, Jonathan’s wife at one point even suggested that the kidnapping was a hoax perpetrated by the president’s political enemies in the runup to the 2015 elections.

The Jonathan administration’s shift from Boko Haram as a marginal concern to be addressed primarily by local and state governments to an aspect of a worldwide threat–including calling for the United Nations to blacklist it as a terrorist organization–is likely a response to international and domestic pressure on behalf of the school girls and the manifest inability of the security services to find them.

In his Paris speech, Jonathan continues utterly to deny the numerous reports from credible human rights organizations and the Western media of security service human rights violations. The security services, he says “…were directed to adhere strictly to clearly spelt out rules of engagement and avoid any excesses that may amount to a violation of human rights. Careful regard for human rights has always been central to our counter-terrorism strategies, resulting in the adoption of rules and procedures to protect the civilian population from excessive collateral damage.”

If only what the president says were true. Adopting “rules and procedures” is not the same thing as following them.

The New York Times and other media outlets report that the United States Department of Defense has signed an intelligence sharing agreement with Nigeria in the search for the school girls. Currently, there is a U.S. team of experts consulting  in Abuja to determine what further assistance the Nigerian government may need in the search. The U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) is training the newly formed “Nigerian Rangers.” Some members of Congress appear prepared to embrace Jonathan’s account that Boko Haram is the “new frontier of the war on terrorism,” which could imply more U.S. involvement.

There have already been Senate and House hearings regarding this. Yet, even with the small steps the Obama administration has already taken, there is a huge risk that the United States will come to be identified with the Nigerian security service’s human rights violations, about which Jonathan shows no will to address. That could be the next chapter in the utterly destructive—and widely believed—narrative of a U.S. “war on Islam.”

Post a Comment 1 Comment

  • Posted by Femi

    Why are you so fixed on security services human right abuses and ignore the violent extremism of this fanatics. Just yesterday 150 Nigerians lost their lives to the same sect you passionately advised your goverment not to designate as an FTO. If you are going to assist in combating this menace just do it. Walk the walk with us instead of this talk shop. Your armed services drop missiles on insurgents in the badlands of Afghanistan with collateral damage. If that is not right abuse then what is?

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required