Steven A. Cook

From the Potomac to the Euphrates

Cook examines developments in the Middle East and their resonance in Washington.

Print Print Email Email Share Share Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

Egypt: Ministry of Chaos

by Steven A. Cook
March 11, 2013

Riot police walk in front of the Interior Ministry headquarters in Cairo March 8, 2013 (Amr Abdallah Dalsh/Courtesy Reuters). Riot police walk in front of the Interior Ministry headquarters in Cairo March 8, 2013 (Amr Abdallah Dalsh/Courtesy Reuters).

The lawlessness and seemingly senseless violence that has descended upon Egypt in recent weeks has led some Egyptians to wonder whether March 2013 is the modern analogue to January 1952.  Black Sunday, as it came to be known, was a spasm of violence that engulfed Cairo after British forces killed a group of Egyptian policeman in the city of Ismailia.  That day of rage—January 25—culminated in a fire in downtown Cairo that destroyed movie theaters, restaurants, and clubs.  Debate continues over who started the fires with some contending it was the Muslim Brotherhood and other arguing that it was provocateurs associated with the Free Officers.  Regardless, Black Sunday set in motion a chain of events that led to the Free Officers coup of July 1952.

It could happen again.  Egypt is hanging by a thread.  The military, which is already in the streets in Port Said—a city that has been in open revolt for more than a month—may find it has no other choice as if the situation deteriorates further.  My friend, Issandr el Amrani, offers a compelling explanation of the violence in a recent column in The National.  He focuses the build of his attention on the so-called “Ultras,” who were the shock troops of the revolution and heroes to many, but who are little more than anarchists engaged in violence for the sake of violence. Issandr also touches on the problems associated with the Ministry of Interior, which is notorious for its brutality.  And while everyone agrees that the Ministry is badly in need of reform, neither the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces during its eighteen-month tenure holding executive power nor President Mohammed Morsi has been willing to move against this redoubt of the old regime.  Why?  Given the profound way Egyptians loathe the Ministry of Interior, it seems that the potential political payoff of sacking the police generals who run the place would be too hard to resist.

As much as bulldozing the Ministry of Interior would likely reverse President Morsi’s declining fortunes, he—like Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi before him—will never do it because he both needs and fears the police.  Who would control the streets if the president thoroughly purged the ministry and started over again? The answer is no one and the inevitable result would be chaos, which is a point the police are currently driving home rather effectively as they walk off the job in as many as ten of twenty-nine governorates.  The police say they will no longer do Morsi’s bidding, but they are really signaling to the president that he cannot trifle with the cops.  In a counterintuitive way, lawlessness is the Ministry of Interior’s insurance policy against the two “p’s”: purge and prosecution.  It is hard to be sympathetic to Morsi, but he is in a tough spot.  If he does little more than whatever cosmetic changes he has made to the ministry, he pays politically with Egyptians who regard the police as a symbol of brutality and oppression.  If he takes on the ministry, he pays politically because he is blamed for the parlous state of security in what were once Egypt’s safe streets.  As with so much else in Egypt these days, Morsi has chosen the middle path, meaning he has chosen to fiddle as Cairo burns…again.

Post a Comment 3 Comments

  • Posted by Imran Riffat

    Morsi’s actions reflect extremely poor decisions that he is making. This is not the time to protect and preserve the interests of the Brothers; the future of Egypt hangs by a delicate thread. He must immediately consult with the opposition to build consensus to save the country from falling off the brink. An imperfect democracy is always better than military rule. Morsi has to prove within a short time that he is capable of leading the march towards a more democratic Egypt that is also a secure place for all its citizens. If he is not able to do this he should step aside. A broad-based national government, with civilians in the cabinet, might be one solution.

  • Posted by Nick

    Yet again Morsi ‘leads from behind’. Cairo burns, inflation is at multi-year highs, unemployment through the roof, with cash, fuel, and electricity becoming short in supply. Food riots may be the last straw.

    If things continue as they are, the military may very well pull off another coup, the people will be begging for it.

  • Posted by Porthos

    As Imran says, Morsy is not only not doing what he’s supposed to do to help his country, he is constantly doing the Muslim Brotherhood’s bidding. One keeps on hearing about odd things, unrelated with addressing the needs of Egypt. It seems to me his obedience and religiosity is such that he is incompetent to rule over ALL Egyptians. Egypt now needs a unifier, a leader to do his 4 years, or eight years and then step for the next person. That’s how democracy works. Obviously the writer here misses the point when he says Morsy is in a tough spot, he isn’t, the man is spineless…

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required

Pingbacks