CFR Presents

Net Politics

CFR experts investigate the impact of information and communication technologies on security, privacy, and international affairs.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

Despite Cyber Agreements, Russia and China Are Not as Close as You Think

by Guest Blogger
June 30, 2016

Despite attempts to signal a close relationship, Russia and China remain pretty far apart from each other. (Greg Baker/Reuters) Despite attempts to signal a close relationship, Russia and China remain pretty far apart from each other. (Greg Baker/Reuters)

Share

Lincoln Davidson is a research associate for Asia Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Last week, at the conclusion of bilateral talks between China and Russia held in Beijing, Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin issued a joint statement on cooperation between the two countries, which included a section on cyber issues. But despite lofty words, it doesn’t seem that much progress has been achieved on Sino-Russian cybersecurity cooperation.

The main points of the joint statement are as follows:

  • The two sides recognized their responsibility as countries with a large presence on the internet to uphold cybersecurity and construct a “new global order” for a cyberspace that is “peaceful, secure, open, and cooperative.”
  • Both countries affirmed that the UN Charter’s provisions on the use of force, respect for national sovereignty, and not interfering in the internal affairs of other states apply in cyberspace, and that states should “abide by and respect the principle of cyber sovereignty,” which is “the extension and expansion of state sovereignty in cyberspace.”
  • The two countries reaffirmed that “the entire international community should strive to prevent conflicts in cyberspace and not permit the use of information and communications technologies to damage peace and stability.”
  • Both sides consider the “internationalization of internet governance” to be a “strategic mission,” with the end goal of a “fair distribution of the basic resources of the internet” through the promotion of a “multilateral, democratic, and transparent internet governance system” in which “the United Nations and every country’s government, businesses, and international organizations play a major role.”
  • Both countries committed to increasing cooperation on cyber issues.

None of this is new. China and Russia first penned an agreement outlining their support for these positions back in 2009 (through the Shanghai Cooperation Organization), and submitted an updated version of this “Code of Conduct for Information Security” to the United Nations General Assembly in 2011. A new version of that document was again submitted to the UN last year. And in April 2015 the two countries signed a bilateral agreement that has been branded as a “nonaggression pact” for cyberspace, although some have argued that this is a misreading of the agreement.

Last week’s joint statement clarifies that the countries’ lead representatives on cyber issues are the director of the Cyberspace Administration of China and the president of Russia’s assistant responsible for information technology, and that the two sides should “regularly meet [to] harmonize their overall plans” for cyber policy. This would seem to deliver on a commitment from the April 2015 agreement, which requires both countries to identify points of contact and communication channels to manage the relationship.

However, it is hard to imagine that it takes a full year to simply identify a lead point of contact for each country. Compared to the progress made by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Chinese Ministry of Public Security working group on cyber issues, which has met twice since September 2015, this is a glacial pace. Could there be discord between the two countries that explains the delay?

Earlier this week, Shen Dingli, deputy dean of the Institute of International Studies at Fudan University and a leading voice in Chinese foreign policy debates, responded to the agreement by making the case that “China is a realistic country” that doesn’t form long-term alliances, and that cooperation with Russia is merely what is advantageous for the moment in “counterbalancing the US.”

“No matter what the Sino-Russian bilateral relationship is going through for the moment…none of them are long-term strategies, but only tactical cooperation,” Shen wrote.

If only the tactical cooperation was actually happening.

Post a Comment No Comments

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required

Pingbacks