<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China’s External Investments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cfr.org/geographics/2009/09/21/china%e2%80%99s-external-investments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/geographics/2009/09/21/china%e2%80%99s-external-investments/</link>
	<description>A graphical take on geoeconomic issues, with links to the news and expert commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:14:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rien Huizer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/geographics/2009/09/21/china%e2%80%99s-external-investments/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Rien Huizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/geographics/?p=541#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Interesting pice of data. Supports widely held intuition that &quot;China&quot; (in this case the predominantly the state in all of its manifestations, because the locally owned private sector may be unable (or unwilling, or using overseas chinese friends) to invest abroad) seems to aspire to operating like a vertically integrated (set of) conglomerate. And the state wants to compensate for the lack of inputs (quality/quantity/cost) of locally available ones. Technology is an important input that would generally not result in cross border financial investment (of course China would like to buy some technology companies if it was allowed to do so) but of course &quot;technology imports/investments&quot;  would be a far more important topic.

But this once more underlines the fact that &quot;China&quot; is no ordinary investor..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting pice of data. Supports widely held intuition that &#8220;China&#8221; (in this case the predominantly the state in all of its manifestations, because the locally owned private sector may be unable (or unwilling, or using overseas chinese friends) to invest abroad) seems to aspire to operating like a vertically integrated (set of) conglomerate. And the state wants to compensate for the lack of inputs (quality/quantity/cost) of locally available ones. Technology is an important input that would generally not result in cross border financial investment (of course China would like to buy some technology companies if it was allowed to do so) but of course &#8220;technology imports/investments&#8221;  would be a far more important topic.</p>
<p>But this once more underlines the fact that &#8220;China&#8221; is no ordinary investor..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geographics</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/geographics/2009/09/21/china%e2%80%99s-external-investments/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Geographics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/geographics/?p=541#comment-183</guid>
		<description>The external investment portion of the chart was made by aggregating individual deals, which includes partial stakes, not just M&amp;A, from Bloomberg’s deal data.  It should be inclusive of all Chinese entities.  Bloomberg does a fair job picking up deals that are mentioned in the press. However, deals that are not disclosed would be missing from the data set.  The data set includes 643 deals, although not all had a sector data field.  

We created a countries/regions chart, but those data are inadequate to the task – at least without a lot of clean-up.  This is due to deals being labeled based on location of incorporation instead of location of activity.  The Virgin Islands, for example, end up with a large weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The external investment portion of the chart was made by aggregating individual deals, which includes partial stakes, not just M&amp;A, from Bloomberg’s deal data.  It should be inclusive of all Chinese entities.  Bloomberg does a fair job picking up deals that are mentioned in the press. However, deals that are not disclosed would be missing from the data set.  The data set includes 643 deals, although not all had a sector data field.  </p>
<p>We created a countries/regions chart, but those data are inadequate to the task – at least without a lot of clean-up.  This is due to deals being labeled based on location of incorporation instead of location of activity.  The Virgin Islands, for example, end up with a large weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FT.com &#124; Money Supply &#124; Morning round-up</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/geographics/2009/09/21/china%e2%80%99s-external-investments/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>FT.com &#124; Money Supply &#124; Morning round-up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/geographics/?p=541#comment-181</guid>
		<description>[...] China has meaningfully pushed towards domestic demand, largely via investment, to support growth. But data show a strong external bias in Chinese investment: the country is securing materials and energy abroad, but investing relatively little in health [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] China has meaningfully pushed towards domestic demand, largely via investment, to support growth. But data show a strong external bias in Chinese investment: the country is securing materials and energy abroad, but investing relatively little in health [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/geographics/2009/09/21/china%e2%80%99s-external-investments/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/geographics/?p=541#comment-180</guid>
		<description>interesting chart, matches with some of the other data and anectdotal data.  what entities are you including in &quot;China&quot;, the CIC, SAFE, national oil companies, all SOEs? 

It would also be interesting to see a chart like this on countries/regions of equity investment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting chart, matches with some of the other data and anectdotal data.  what entities are you including in &#8220;China&#8221;, the CIC, SAFE, national oil companies, all SOEs? </p>
<p>It would also be interesting to see a chart like this on countries/regions of equity investment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geographics</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/geographics/2009/09/21/china%e2%80%99s-external-investments/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Geographics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/geographics/?p=541#comment-173</guid>
		<description>This picture only applies to business investment.  Those data are not from the NIIP release; rather they are aggregated from individual investments collected by Bloomberg.  The database captures both acquisition and partial investment, but is certainly not perfect.  It would likely miss small direct equity investment or equity investment through external managers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This picture only applies to business investment.  Those data are not from the NIIP release; rather they are aggregated from individual investments collected by Bloomberg.  The database captures both acquisition and partial investment, but is certainly not perfect.  It would likely miss small direct equity investment or equity investment through external managers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bws</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/geographics/2009/09/21/china%e2%80%99s-external-investments/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>bws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/geographics/?p=541#comment-169</guid>
		<description>how do you estimate china&#039;s external investment?  presumably they are in aggregate overwieght us and european fixed income and underweight equities.  does china have niip data that shows it total external investments across sectors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how do you estimate china&#8217;s external investment?  presumably they are in aggregate overwieght us and european fixed income and underweight equities.  does china have niip data that shows it total external investments across sectors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

