Benn Steil


A graphical take on geoeconomic issues, with links to the news and expert commentary.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


Can the U.S. Afford Global Military Supremacy?

November 8, 2010

America’s share of global military spending is a measure, albeit crude, of its military supremacy. Viewed through this lens, the United States is clearly dominant, accounting for over 40% of the world’s total military spending, and 7 times that of the second largest spender, China. The U.S. share of global military spending has increased since 1990, but this twenty-year trend hides an underlying weakness. Any change in the U.S. share can be attributed to the operation of four factors: (1) changes in U.S. GDP, (2) changes in rest-of-world GDP, (3) changes in U.S. military spending as a percent of GDP, and (4) changes in rest-of-world military spending as a percent of GDP. Real GDP growth is a sustainable source of change, whereas changes in spending as a percent of GDP require painful tradeoffs and are ultimately unsustainable. Over the past twenty years, the increase in the ratio of U.S. military spending to world military spending has been driven primarily by unsustainable forces. The rest-of-world spent less as a percent of GDP (green) in the 1990s, and the United States spent more as a percent of GDP (blue) after 9/11. As the rest-of-world is growing faster than the U.S., the critical GDP-growth factors are increasingly becoming a drag on this ratio. Given worsening budgetary constraints, the United States must find new ways to maintain its relative military power while its spending share decreases – or it must prepare for a decline in its military supremacy.

Gelb: GDP Now Matters More Than Force
Haass, Altman: American Profligacy and American Power
Gelb: Obama’s Conflict-More Jobs or More War
Geo-Graphics: U.S. Interest vs. Defense Spending
Economist: Hands Off the Warfare State!

Post a Comment 3 Comments

  • Posted by John Daniel Toh

    With the decrease in budget, another way to expansion is through joint military exercises?

  • Posted by H.E. Gen Dr Colin Peter RXLD

    I think it`s beyond the question of affordability. It already has and still can afford such The issue now is our (US)strength to sustain such. Cheers!

  • Posted by 4948

    Plan B: Just dont care about “military supermacy”. The world cant be destroyed more than once.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required