Benn Steil


A graphical take on geoeconomic issues, with links to the news and expert commentary.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


There’s a $1 Trillion Hole in Romney’s Budget Math

by Benn Steil and Dinah Walker
October 18, 2012


In last week’s vice-presidential debate, Republican Paul Ryan defended the fiscal prudence of lowering top marginal income tax rates by arguing that it would be accompanied by “forego[ing] about $1.1 trillion in loopholes and deductions . . . deny[ing] those loopholes and deductions to higher-income taxpayers.” The $1.1 trillion he refers to is actually an amalgam of specific “tax expenditures” – benefits distributed through reductions in taxes otherwise owed – identified by the Joint Committee on Taxation.  We break out the largest 10 of these graphically in the figure above. The full list is available here:

The red bars indicate items that Romney and Ryan had previously promised not to touch: exclusion of employer contributions for health care, deductions for mortgage interest, reduced tax rates on dividends and long-term capital gains, and deductions for charitable giving.  These four items constitute a massive 30% of the $1.1 trillion.  Therefore the Ryan pledge to cut loopholes and deductions cannot, mathematically, be worth more than $770 billion.

And note some of the other big-ticket “loopholes and deductions” on the list.  Social security and other retirement income constitute three of the top ten items, together making up 13% of the total, and the earned income credit, which benefits the poor, represents another 5% of the total.  Would Romney and Ryan eliminate those deductions?  We’ll speculate here: no.  A quick skim of the remainder shows that few of these items constitute “loopholes” in the public’s mind – they are items few imagine could or should be taxed.

In short, Romney and Ryan cannot, logically, keep the pledge to cut $1.1 trillion in tax shields for the rich, because (1) they have already ruled out eliminating the biggest of such shields, and (2) much of the $1.1 trillion is actually derived from tax expenditures targeted at lower and middle income taxpayers – not tax shields for the rich.  This almost surely means that only a small fraction of the $1.1 trillion is actually in play.

Sensitive to the charge that his numbers are not adding up, Romney proposed at Tuesday night’s presidential debate capping deductions at $25,000.  This would raise $1.3 trillion in revenues over the next ten years, according to the Tax Policy Center.  But that figure is only slightly above what Ryan said they would raise each year.  A $1 trillion a year hole remains in their budget math.

Transcript: The 2012 Vice Presidential Debate
Pew: Subsidyscope Tax Expenditure Database
Romney: Tax Plan
Ryan: Sept. 30 Appearance on Fox News Sunday

Post a Comment No Comments

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required