James M. Lindsay

The Water's Edge

Lindsay analyzes the politics shaping U.S. foreign policy and the sustainability of American power.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


Is the Soaring Cost of College a Problem?

by James M. Lindsay
May 14, 2012

College-Tuition-20120514 Political science major Paul Fabsik wears a price tag hanging from his mortarboard. (Brian Snyder/courtesy Reuters)


The New York Times ran a fascinating article yesterday on soaring student college debt. To make a long story short—and at 4,500+ words it was a long story—students are taking on a lot more debt to get themselves through college and finding it harder to pay back what they borrowed. That trend is worrying. Because if the system for financing American higher education breaks down, one of the country’s primary mechanisms for generating social mobility, lessening income inequality, and stimulating economic growth will be lost.

Here are some of the eye-opening statistics the Times offers up:

  • 94 percent of students who earn a bachelor’s degree borrow to pay for higher education—up from 45 percent in 1993.
  • The average debt in 2011 for all student loan borrowers was $23,300, with 10 percent owing more than $54,000 and 3 percent more than $100,000. (These figures do not include money that parents borrow by, say, taking out a second mortgage on their homes or maxing out credit cards.)
  • The total amount of federal student loans has grown by more than 60 percent over the past five years.
  • Nearly one in ten student loan borrowers who started repayment in 2009 defaulted within two years—a rate roughly twice that in 2005.
  • According to data from the College Board, state and local financing per student declined by 24 percent nationally between 2001 and 2011.
  • Again according to the College Board, tuition and fees at four-year state colleges jumped 72 percent between 2001 and 2011, while they were up 29 percent for nonprofit private institutions.

Soaring tuition has sparked political fights over how to provide more student loans at lower interest rates. But easier access to money just encourages people to borrow more and colleges to charge more. The critical task is to get costs under control, as the Times notes in a follow-up article. That will be hard do in part because it’s not how most college administrators think:

“I readily admit it,” said E. Gordon Gee, the president of Ohio State University, who has also served as president of Vanderbilt and Brown, among others. “I didn’t think a lot about costs. I do not think we have given significant thought to the impact of college costs on families.”

President Gee knows of what he speaks. He racked up more than $550,000 in travel charges over the past two years and nearly $850,000 over the past five. And his total compensation package runs about $2 million. That’s far more than what your average full professor makes.

Getting soaring college costs under control is going to be hard to do because it reflects more than inflated presidential salaries or overpaid football coaches and sumptuous facilities for varsity sports (to name two other factors I hear mentioned frequently). It also owes to things like escalating parental and student demands for services. With one kid in college (Wahoowa!), another set to start in the fall (Go Blue!), and two more in high school, I have been on my fair share of college tours. And what I hear parents and students saying is that they want more small classes, personalized instruction, extensive personal and career counseling services, state-of-the-art recreational facilities, and dorm food that tastes like a three-star restaurant. Those things all cost money. But schools that let their average class size grow or say no to building an indoor rock climbing facility risk seeing prize students head over to Rival U.

Sadly, there aren’t any easy fixes for the college cost problem. But the current cost growth simply isn’t sustainable. And as the late economist Herb Stein liked to remark, “if a thing cannot go on forever, it will stop.”

Post a Comment 2 Comments

  • Posted by Ole Holsti

    Colleges could cut costs by eliminating most assistant coaches. Does a football team really need a dozen [highly paid] assistants?
    Football is a pretty simple game and two coaches –one for offense, one for defense–should be able to handle it all. For other sports, one should be enough.
    That’s only a start.

  • Posted by Tony

    I am very concerned about the rising cost of being an educated person. At the same time, there are more and more on-line universities and colleges that are popping up which mostly have degraded the true quality and value of education in our country.
    Unless, you are an athlete or above average students, the middle class is feeling more and more pressure to raise enough money for their kid’s college education.
    Regarding student loans; Government should encourage more and more students to work for government for limited time in order to pay off their debt from student loan after their graduation.
    The employment for government could be : peace corps, department education, teaching K-12 schools, Military or environmental agencies.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required