Shannon K. O'Neil

Latin America's Moment

O'Neil analyzes developments in Latin America and U.S. relations in the region.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


Chihuahua’s Version of Colombia’s Wealth Tax

by Shannon K. O'Neil
September 18, 2012

A soldier walks past the police headquarters where Marisol Valles Garcia used to work as the police chief in Praxedis G. Guerrero (Stringer/Courtesy Reuters). A soldier walks past the police headquarters where Marisol Valles Garcia used to work as the police chief in Praxedis G. Guerrero (Stringer/Courtesy Reuters).


I’ve argued in the past that to truly address the security situation, Mexico needs the buy in of its citizens—and particularly of its elites. One way of achieving this is to levy a tax on the wealthy or business owners, those most able to shoulder the costs of this vital public good.

There are encouraging precedents elsewhere. In 2002 Colombia’s government and elites agreed to a “democratic security tax” of 1.2 percent on the assets of the country’s top 1 percent. This tax brought in over $800 million a year, providing significant additional resources to combat the cartels. It also helped improve the government’s fiscal management, as part of the bargain was more transparency as to how these new funds would be used.

The idea of a wealth tax has yet to take hold in Mexico at the national level. But it has gained ground more locally, and in the areas hardest hit by the violence. In December 2011 the state of Chihuahua levied a 5 percent “surcharge” to the state’s 2 percent payroll tax for security-related projects. This came about through the active efforts of a group of Ciudad Juárez local business owners, determined to rescue and revive their city. To ensure greater transparency, these funds are being placed in an independent public trust.

One of the first initiatives supported by these new resources is the Chihuahua Citizen Observatory, an organization designed to measure crime levels throughout the state. While just a start, Chihuahua’s version of the wealth tax is an important step toward a safer city, state, and ultimately nation. It is now up to Chihuahua’s citizens to make sure these funds are spent well, and, by their example, to encourage others throughout Mexico to invest in a safer future.

Post a Comment 2 Comments

  • Posted by Adam Isacson

    Interesting, didn’t know Chihuahua had done this. But if it’s actually a _payroll_ tax, instead of a wealth or income tax, it’s disappointing.

    A payroll tax would take 5 percent mostly from middle and working-class Chihuahuans with formal jobs, but wouldn’t touch assets or investment income.

    Colombia’s wealth tax raised money by hitting the assets of the wealthiest 1%, but Chihuahua’s wealthiest, for whom wages aren’t the largest source of income, would get a free ride.

  • Posted by Shannon K. O'Neil

    Hi Adam,

    It is an added payroll tax on the employer (not the employee side), which the Chihuahua businesses agreed to add to their costs. Not all businesses or business groups have supported the tax, which has faced opposition from groups such as CANACO:

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required