Stewart M. Patrick

The Internationalist

Patrick assesses the future of world order, state sovereignty, and multilateral cooperation.

Print Print Email Email Share Share Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

Rising Regionalism and Pakistan

by Stewart M. Patrick
August 26, 2011

India's Prime Minister Manmohan Singh (R) speaks with his Pakistani counterpart Yusuf Raza Gilani as they watch the ICC Cricket World Cup semi-final match between India and Pakistan in Mohali March 30, 2011. The prime ministers of nuclear-armed foes India and Pakistan stood side by side on Wednesday at a World Cup cricket match and clapped to each other's national anthems in a symbolic gesture aimed at rebuilding ties shattered by the 2008 Mumbai attacks. (Raveendran/Pool/ Courtesy Reuters)

As the United States and Pakistan’s relationship degrades to a precarious semi-alliance, Pakistan’s neighbors and other nations in the region are quickly assessing how to respond. The region is glaringly under-institutionalized, with the exception of the moribund South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation.  In theory, much could be gained from a regional organization to promote economic cooperation, take full advantage of the region’s energy resources, and address the area’s rampant illegal drug trafficking.

Furthermore, the U.S. drawdown in Afghanistan promises to further destabilize the fragile cooperation of the region. Regional confidence-building and eventual integration will be essential for sustainable peace and prosperity. The question is whether Pakistan’s swelling population and large economy can be transformed into an asset.

To answer this question, CFR Senior Fellow Dan Markey held the first meeting of the International Institutions and Global Governance Program’s new series, Rising Regionalism, which seeks to analyze the depth, performance, and challenges of the globe’s increasing number of regional organizations—and how the United States should respond.

Some opportunities for cooperation mentioned in the meeting note included:

  • There is an increasingly widespread recognition in India that the threat of armed conflict with Pakistan is harmful to economic growth. This could be a driving force of cooperation, and Indian officials should seek to emphasize this both to their own citizens and to the Pakistani people to lay some groundwork for regional cooperation. Low level cooperation to transport and sell resources could also establish patterns of bottom-up cooperation.
  • China is keen to expand its business interests in Pakistan, as well as aiming to build strategic lines of communication with Pakistan to provide the Chinese navy and Chinese businesses with access to the Indian Ocean. However, China would be unwilling to offer assistance to Pakistan to confront the violent instability that plagues some of its cities and provinces. Regional cooperation would also need to integrate India, about which China would likely show skepticism.
  • Participants also noted that Iran hopes to increase its footprint throughout South Asia, but the United States would have some bones to pick before jumping on board with that.

Finally, the Internationalist can’t forget a lesson learned as a mid-level State Department policy planning staff member some years ago. Tasked with drafting some possibilities for integrating Afghanistan with its neighbors, including Pakistan, I quickly came face to face with realities on the ground. Regional and cultural experts found my proposals utterly laughable in light of international meddling—bordering on sabotage —that is common in the area. The major players in that tough neighborhood have distinctly different strategic visions, not to mention rampant corruption and considerable governance gaps. On the other hand, most people would never have expected Germany, France, and Britain to plant the seeds for an integrated European Union after devastating each other during World War II.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required