Stewart M. Patrick

The Internationalist

Patrick assesses the future of world order, state sovereignty, and multilateral cooperation.

Print Print Email Email Share Share Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

Modern Life, Modern Ills: The NCD Summit

by Stewart M. Patrick
September 26, 2011

A man smokes next to a "No Smoking" sign in downtown Shanghai April 27, 2011. (Carlos Barria/ Courtesy Reuters)

Beneath the UNGA din about Palestine last week, the United Nations also held its second-ever high level meeting on a health issue: noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). Once considered to primarily plague developed countries, lifestyle illnesses like lung cancer, heart disease, and obesity now place a massive burden on poor and rich nations alike. Beyond the very poorest countries, NCDs now surpass infectious disease in contributing to morbidity and mortality. According to a new report by the World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum, NCDs cost the African continent nearly $500 billion dollars a year—more than ten times the value of aid received from international donors.

Last week, IIGG updated the multimedia package, Global Governance Monitor: Public Health, to reflect the growing effort by international organizations and UN member states to cooperate in reducing the economic and societal burden of NCDs.  An interactive map tracks hotspots of health concerns, with tobacco and obesity earning attention alongside H1N1 and smallpox:

A screen shot from the Global Governance Monitor: Public Health. Text reads "Over one-third of all Russians—and over half of that country's adult males—smoke...helping explain why life expectancy in Russia is some ten years lower than in the average Western European country."

The monitor also highlights recent smoking bans in enclosed indoor spaces enacted by developing countries like China, India and Venezuela, which demonstrate the new visibility of these issues (though my experience traveling to India and China inspires some doubt about enforcement happening soon).

The outcome of the UN NCD summit disappointed many public health experts, who were looking for dramatic action. But in a recent expert brief, my colleague Tom Bollyky, CFR Senior Fellow for Global Health, Economics and Development, argues that the event actually made important strides—particularly in building momentum for addressing the spread of NCDs and establishing a framework for NGOs and private enterprises to cooperate with national governments and international institutions:

The UN declaration that emerged this week fell short of expectations, but has positive elements. It recognizes the epidemic proportions of NCDs worldwide and their social and economic impact. The declaration notes that “the rising prevalence, morbidity, and mortality” of NCDs can be largely prevented with cost-efficient public health measures such as improved tobacco control, although it does not mandate specific approaches or their adoption. It mobilized no new resources for global NCD prevention and control efforts, but calls for private-sector partnerships and information-sharing to provide the technical assistance and capacity-building needed in developing countries. The declaration tasks the WHO with developing a comprehensive global monitoring program and voluntary targets to prevent and control NCDs by 2012, which countries should “consider” in developing their national plans. It requires the UN secretary-general to prepare a report on options for facilitating multi-sectorial action on NCDs by 2012 and to assess its implementation by 2014.

The high-level meeting had other benefits as well, increasing media attention on NCDs and improving cooperation among international NGOs and advocacy groups. There also was modest progress at the national level with Hungary and South Africa announcing new regulations on trans-fat and dietary salt and Australia committing $25 million in aid to help Pacific island countries tackle non-communicable diseases. Numerous corporations likewise announced voluntary initiatives to improve the health of their foods and new NCD philanthropic initiatives in low- and middle-income countries.

The G77 nations and NCD Alliance had hoped for firm, time-bound targets for reducing the prevalence of NCDs—with most of the funding, coming as usual, from wealthy states in the international donor community. But considering the economic battles raging in the home courts of the United States, Europe and Japan, as well as their own healthcare burdens, these goals were probably unrealistic from the start.

Post a Comment 1 Comment

  • Posted by Jerrod Redish

    Together with almost everything which appears to be developing throughout this subject matter, many of your opinions are relatively exciting. Having said that, I beg your pardon, because I do not give credence to your entire plan, all be it radical none the less. It would seem to everybody that your comments are not entirely validated and in simple fact you are yourself not even wholly confident of the argument. In any case I did enjoy examining it.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required