Stewart M. Patrick

The Internationalist

Patrick assesses the future of world order, state sovereignty, and multilateral cooperation.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


Global Agenda: The Roots of Trump’s Trade Rage

by Guest Blogger for Stewart M. Patrick
January 17, 2017

Swiss special police officers observe the surrounding area from atop the roof of the Davos Congress Hotel ahead of the Annual Meeting 2016 of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland. (Ruben Sprich/Reuters)


This blog post is part of a series entitled Global Agenda, in which experts will identify major global challenges facing President-Elect Trump, the options available to him, and what is at stake for the United States and its partners. This following post is authored by Edward Alden, Bernard L. Schwartz Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.

For more than three decades, Donald Trump has made it clear that, if ever elected president, he would turn U.S. trade policy in a radically different direction. And he himself would be at the helm. “What I would do if elected president would be to appoint myself U.S. Trade Representative,” he wrote in his 2000 book The America We Deserve, when he was considering a run for president on the Reform Party ticket. “My lawyers have checked, and the president has this authority. I would take personal charge of negotiations…. Our trading partners would have to sit across the table from Donald Trump and I guarantee you the rip-off of the United States would end.”

Now, against all odds, Trump is about to become the president of the United States, and he has the extraordinary opportunity to upend an elite consensus that has shaped America’s global strategy since the second World War.

In an article just published in Politico Magazine, I argue that Trump’s election indeed promises a new way forward that will be the most nationalist—and likely protectionist—that the United States has seen in nearly a century. The American political system—let alone the transnational elites now gathering in Davos, Switzerland—has not yet come to terms with just how massive the changes are likely to be.

Read “The Roots of Trump’s Trade Rage” by Edward Alden in Politico Magazine.

Post a Comment 1 Comment

  • Posted by Peter Smith

    What is the CFR stance regarding the 2nd amendment of the US Constitution? President DT was elected as a direct result of his strong support of tje second amendment and the resultant NRA endorsment. The Clintons went down as a result. Gun owners remember in November, and did not forget BC’s anti 2A actions as President and expected an even stronger version from HC. Americans view firearms ownership as the last bulwark against tyranny, and the first line in the defence of individual freedoms. Strong LOCAL organizing for 2A rights now underway…watch the results in a state near you! NRA: 5 million members, door to door, face to face…in the voting booths…not subject to corruption or financial manipulation. Politicians summoned to meetings of voters, something new…

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required