CFR Presents

Renewing America

Ideas and initiatives for rebuilding American economic strength.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


Obama Slapdown on Chinese Wind Deal Sends Wrong Message

by Edward Alden
September 28, 2012

Wind turbines operate at a wind farm near Milford, Utah (George Frey/Courtesy Reuters). Wind turbines operate at a wind farm near Milford, Utah (George Frey/Courtesy Reuters).


President Obama has become the first president in 22 years to issue a formal order blocking a foreign investment into the United States on national security grounds. The decision, which denies the acquisition of a small Oregon wind farm project by a Chinese-owned company, will unfortunately be seen as yet another signal – this time from the highest possible level — that the United States does not really want Chinese investment. And for an economy still struggling to create jobs, that’s the wrong signal to send.

The action by Obama is the first presidential rejection of a foreign acquisition on security grounds since President George H.W. Bush blocked a Chinese aerospace company from acquiring Mamco, a Seattle maker of aerospace components. While many other potential transactions not involving Chinese companies have been withdrawn as a result of U.S. government security concerns, the formal decision by President Obama will reinforce Chinese fears that their acquisitions in the United States face an unfairly high level of scrutiny.

As David Marchick of the Carlyle Group wrote in a Renewing America Policy Innovation Memorandum earlier this year, “many Chinese executives believe the United States is unwelcoming of Chinese investment, even though the vast majority of Chinese investments in the United States have either been approved or have not required any approval.” The president’s decision will be yet another case to add to the political firestorm that ended the Chinese National Offshore Oil Corporation’s (CNOOC) effort to acquire Unocal Oil Company in 2005, or the brick wall that has greeted telecom giant Huawei’s U.S. acquisition bids.

The timing could hardly be worse, coming just as Chinese reluctance to enter the U.S. market seemed to have ended. Indeed, the Obama administration has tried hard to lay out the welcome mat, aware of the potential economic benefits of expanded Chinese investment. According to the Rhodium Group, Chinese investment in the United States has surged in the past three years, though from a very small base. Over the past two years, there have been roughly 100 deals worth some $5 billion, compared with an annual average of just 30 deals worth $500 million prior to 2009. In the first six month of 2012, another $3.6 billion in deals were closed, including several large acquisitions such as Sinopec’s purchase of shale gas producer Devon Energy and more recently the purchase of AMC Entertainment by Dalian Wanda, the Chinese media conglomerate.

According to Rhodium, U.S. affiliates of Chinese-owned companies had 27,000 employees in 2011, up from just 10,000 five years ago. If the current pace continues, Chinese investment would likely create 200,000 to 400,000 U.S. jobs by 2020.

The particulars of the president’s decision will probably not matter in how it is perceived. It will certainly be hard to explain just exactly how Chinese ownership of a tiny Oregon wind farm poses any national security threat. Based on claims made through a rare lawsuit, the Treasury-led, inter-agency group that reviews foreign investment on security grounds – known as the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) – appears to have behaved in a particularly heavy-handed way.

The land that was acquired by Ralls, the Chinese buyer, is near a U.S. Navy base that is used as a training site for low-level military aircraft and weapons. According to the court papers filed by Ralls, the company had already agreed at the Navy’s request earlier this year to move part of the wind farm to a new location. But then CFIUS in July abruptly ordered the company to halt all construction on the property and barred Ralls from any further access to the site. It also effectively blocked the company from selling the property to another buyer more to CFIUS’s liking.

More details may emerge that help explain the president’s action (or may not given the secretive nature of CFIUS). But it’s clear that the whole business has been handled abysmally. If the location of the wind farm did indeed pose real security concerns, the U.S. government should have worked quietly with the company to help it find a reasonable way to divest. The transaction was far too small and inconsequential to have risen to the level it did.

Instead, by forcing a presidential action, it becomes a big, public slapdown to another Chinese company. That is not in the economic interests of a country – the United States – that needs all the foreign investment it can get.

Post a Comment 7 Comments

  • Posted by nyodnya

    Putting words in Romney’s mouth.

  • Posted by joeldadrummer

    And if he didn’t block it, Republicans would have a field day saying he’s selling the country to the Chinese.

  • Posted by fds

    hmm, its not necessarily the investment that i would be worried about. the real problem is the chinese would copy the technology.

  • Posted by Adam

    This post would never happen in China. Chinese investors are probably stoked about that. PR with the peeps.

  • Posted by Mazo

    China has conducted industrial and military espionage against the US at unprecedented levles for decades. Prudence is a wise course of action considering the costs the US govt is paying in keeping and defending its technology from chinese espionage and naked theft. It is reckless to ignore long term dangers for the immediate gratification of chinese investment.

  • Posted by Paul

    It is no secret that a lot of Chinese companies are tied to their military, either directly or indirectly by current and former officers chairing their boards. Their telecommunications companies have long been suspected of attempting to install back doors in attempt to circumvent security protocols with their own end users and those companies have been aggressively trying to break into the US market. The US government has a right to take the threat of espionage seriously, especially with such an active cyber war with that country ongoing. With the newest US Navy jammer platforms actively training nearby and the fact the US Navy would most likely be the first responder to any Chinese situation, it would seem the adminisration has made the right call by not allowing us to sell them the proverbial “noose.”

  • Posted by Chris

    I think your statement regarding Devon Energy in paragraph 4 is poorly worded. It seems to convey the message that Sinopec purchased Devon Energy outright while the actual purchase is a 1/3 stake in 5 of Devon Energy’s newer fields.

    Only wanted to make that clear. Thanks! Great article and insight!

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required