The central bank bid

by Brad Setser
December 8, 2004

It seems like America’s biggest creditors stepped up to the plate today. China’s rapidly growing reserves have to go somewhere …

From Bloomberg:

“So-called indirect bidders, which include the foreign central banks, were awarded 65.8 percent of the $15 billion of five-year notes sold today, the biggest share on record since the Treasury reporting the figure in May 2003. Primary dealers won 34.1 percent of the notes, the smallest on record. The balance went to customers buying directly from the Treasury.

The notes, which mature in December 2009, were sold at a yield of 3.55 percent, where they traded minutes before the 1 p.m. bidding deadline.

The Treasury will auction $9 billion of 9 11/12-year notes tomorrow.”

Some central banks may be shifting from short dated treasuries to longer dated Treasuries to get a higher yield — the opposite of the buyers strike scenario I mentioned in an earlier post.

A bit further down in the same article, Bloomberg tells us that foreign central banks did not buy as many bonds last quarter.

“Foreign governments are slowing their purchases of U.S. bonds, based on government debt held in custody at the New York Fed. The increase this quarter is $12.8 billion, compared with $48.4 billion last quarter. Foreigners held $1.85 trillion, or 48 percent, of the $3.85 trillion of tradable Treasuries outstanding in September, according to the Treasury Department.”

I personally would not jump to that conclusion. Japan tends to buy Treasuries rather transparently. Others less so — foreign central banks buying through foreign broker dealers would not show up in the Treasury data. Japan bought fewer Treasuries in the third quarter than in the first and second quarter. Hiding your Treasury buying makes it easier to hide your Treasury selling at some point in the future … it keeps your options open.

Still, right now it seems that a stronger dollar is slowing growth in Japan and Europe, leading investors to conclude Japan and the ECB will enter the FX market to stop the dollar’s fall (or perhaps a few players are just taking profits). And China’s reserve accumulation has accelerated this quarter. The more China, and others, intervene, the longer Treasury yields can stay low, supporting the US expansion.

The price: still growing global imbalances, and ever increasing US external debt. Update: Foreign central banks showed less interest in the reopened 10 year bond.

From Reuters:

“However, indirect bidders, including private investors and foreign central banks, picked up only $879 million, or 10 percent of the whole issue. That compares to 40 percent in the original sale of the notes in November but at least was better than the paltry 2.8 percent seen at the last reopening. “

It seems like foreign central banks generally are less keen on reopened issues: they don’t want more of the same bond they just bought in the initial auction a few weeks ago. So the low participation per se is not a sign they are losing interest in Treasuries. But it also seems that yesterday’s high central bank participation may have reflected a need to roll over maturing bonds rather than new central bank flows into the US treasury market.

Reuters money quote: “Indirect bidder participation was low,” said one trader at a U.S. primary dealer. “Foreigners have not been buyers of this market, even in yesterday’s five-year sale.”

Bloomberg money quote: “We haven’t seen much buying from Asian accounts in Treasuries lately,” Matthew Wakabayashi, a bond trader at the Tokyo unit of Banc of America Securities LLC, said before the auction. The firm is also a primary dealer. “We’re bearish on bonds.”

Makes some sense — the biggest buyer of Treasuries this year has been the Bank of Japan (acting for the MOF), and they have not been intervening in the market since the spring, so they don’t have any new funds to place in Treasuries. China’s reserves are growing fast, but China is less keen on the Treasury market …

I would not buy 10 year Snow bonds at 4.15 either — the central banks may simply have concluded there is no value in these bonds at their current (seemingly high) price.

If anyone knows more, do tell!

Post a Comment11 Comments

  • Posted by anne

    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/08/international/asia/08china.html?hp=&pagewanted=all&position=

    THE GREAT DIVIDE: SUDDENLY LANDLESS
    Farmers Being Moved Aside by China’s Real Estate Boom
    By JIM YARDLEY

    SANCHAWAN, China – For five months, Gao Lading and other angry farmers had occupied the walled compound of the Communist Party’s village office. They had pitched tents, eaten rice and sweet potatoes, and waited.

  • Posted by Silent E

    Has the US fiscal deficit magically disappeared? If not, all these moves seem speculative. The banks are simply ignoring the dollar bubble – but that will only make it worse because the structural imbalances are not being resolved.

    Instead of equity investors and day traders, for-ex markets have central bankers, hedge funds, and major institutional players. But that doesn’t mean they are immune from herd thinking and bubble psychology. Observers called “bubble!” months ago; the private investors are out of this market already; Russia, Indonesia, and the Arab oil states are eyeing the door. We still haven’t hit the 50%+1 tipping point, because the few participants left are REALLY big – the Asian central banks. But it’s close – very close. Closer than anyone thinks.

    (…more thoughts on the bubble at my blog.)

  • Posted by anne

    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/08/international/asia/08land.html

    A Chinese History of Dispossession and Exploitation
    By JIM YARDLEY

    Even today, farmers in China have few property rights.

  • Posted by anne

    For a century, economists thought less developed countries should grow faster than those more developed. The gap should be closed. But, the gap did not close. Less developed countries did not grow faster. Just as economists were giving up the surmise, a few began to notice China and India. China in particular was suddenly growing year on year at a 10% rate. A country with 1.4 billion people that begins to steadily develop at such a rate can make up for many countries with far smaller populations that lag. But, why China? Why India, if India can really be included? And what, and what of the 700 million
    Chinese who realize too little of the gains and who must be included as quickly as possible to prevent disruption of the whole? China is doing just what it must to build an infrastructure and industrial base that will sustain development.

    So, if continued steady development means keeping the Yuan-dollar peg to foster export growth, the peg will be kept. And, Japan in the close, if it must, will follow China in supporting the dollar. China will make the transition gradually, not at the timing of foreign currency speculators.

  • Posted by anne

    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/08/international/asia/08letter.html

    Shangri-La No More: The Dragons Have Settled In
    By HOWARD W. FRENCH

    LHASA, Tibet – They string brilliantly colored flags from the mountaintops here in this land of impossibly crisp blue skies.

  • Posted by anne

    The NYTimes is doing a wonderful job of covering China, if a country far far smaller than China can ever be covered. Paying attention to Chinese history and contemporary China, helps much in understanding how policy is made. Besides, China is a fascinating country from the arts on…

  • Posted by anne

    So then, we need to consider what are defensive investment positions. There were many defensive positions from 2000 through 2002. Technology stocks exploded in 1999, but there was time to take profits. There was also much in the stock market that was reasonably priced, and there were bonds. What now?

  • Posted by glory

    “China’s rapidly growing reserves have to go somewhere …”

    http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000039&sid=afubeIXm3uXc

    Anyone who is shocked that a coveted part of one-time Wall Street bellwether Big Blue is now in Chinese hands had better get used to it, and fast. “It’s just started,” says Donald Straszheim, president of Santa Monica, California-based Straszheim Global Advisors, of what could be the most significant business trend of the decade: Chinese companies rapidly becoming more “internationally acquisitive.”

    China is carrying out a two- phase mergers and acquisitions strategy.

    Phase one, Straszheim says, focuses on locking up foreign sources of commodities — mining companies, mostly — China needs to feed its economic rise. Just about every company of this sort in Canada, Australia, Southeast Asia, Africa and elsewhere is a target.

    The second phase, which is just getting under way, features Chinese acquiring household-name companies to boost global sales and distribution capabilities. Since brands take time to build, it’s logical for companies like Lenovo, household-appliance maker Haier Group or phone-equipment maker Huawei Technologies to look for quick entry points into the U.S.

    Re: “phase one”

    http://news.ft.com/cms/s/3ba5c8a2-495d-11d9-81c7-00000e2511c8.html

    The prospect of declining reserves in their traditional fields of operation means that international oil companies need better access to reserves such as those in Russia and in the Middle East. But this will not be easy. Increased nationalism in oil-producing countries means they are less welcome, while higher crude prices have reduced many governments’ need for international assistance. The international oil companies also need to preserve the returns their investors expect.

    “A decade ago the major oil companies could go to countries and say: ‘Give us attractive terms or we will go somewhere else’,” Mr Zanoyan says. “That is not the case any more.”

    At the same time international oil companies are dealing with the growing threat ofnational oil companies moving beyond their borders to compete on deals. This is especially true of state-owned Chinese companies, which are scouring the globe to secure energy supplies to fuel the country’s breakneck economic growth.

    Lord Browne, chief executive at BP, sees the Chinese state-controlled oil companies, CNOOC, Sinopec and PetroChina, as “real competitors for the future. They are very important companies and I can’t see why they can’t become more involved in government-to-government deals.” China and India’s national oil groups have recently signed huge gas and oil deals in Iran and are exploring further collaboration.

    http://atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/FL08Ag02.html

    Russia is again calling for a Moscow-New Delhi-Beijing axis, an alliance of three nuclear-armed countries of some 2.5 billion people that theoretically would be able to balance US power in coming years.

  • Posted by Silent E

    AP tells us:

    But the twin U.S. deficits left analysts skeptical that the dollar’s gains would last.

    “That’s the reason we don’t believe there is a trend against the euro,” Commerzbank currency analyst Carsten Fritsch said from Frankfurt. “We expect the dollar to weaken further.”

    “The deficit problem is still there and there’s no signal by the U.S. government that it will tackle it.”

    You said it, Carsten.

  • Posted by glory

    M&A’s new giant
    http://news.ft.com/cms/s/ebaf6892-4986-11d9-8ce9-00000e2511c8.html
    “Given the rapid growth of the Chinese economy, the Lenovo-IBM agreement is bound to be the first of many big cross-border industrial deals involving Chinese companies.”

  • Posted by Guest