<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kuwait revalues (again)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: HZ</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/#comment-98037</link>
		<dc:creator>HZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/#comment-98037</guid>
		<description>re: MBS
If you bought straightforward MBS loan pools, even the subprime ones didn't do so badly. Around Feb/Mar meltdown time the discount on whole loans were about 3-4% depending on the originators. If you bought lesser tranches of CDOs with leverage, OTOH, we all know what happened to the Bear funds when creditors came calling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: MBS<br />
If you bought straightforward MBS loan pools, even the subprime ones didn&#8217;t do so badly. Around Feb/Mar meltdown time the discount on whole loans were about 3-4% depending on the originators. If you bought lesser tranches of CDOs with leverage, OTOH, we all know what happened to the Bear funds when creditors came calling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsetser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/#comment-98036</link>
		<dc:creator>bsetser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/#comment-98036</guid>
		<description>twofish -- the us survey data and the tic data both do indicate that someone in china has been buying corporate debt, a category in the us data that includes MBS that lack an agency guarantee.   and all the anecdotes suggest chinese names have been buying so called private MBS (tho i always assumed they were buying the higher rated tranches). it must be SAFE, the banks or some other financial institution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twofish &#8212; the us survey data and the tic data both do indicate that someone in china has been buying corporate debt, a category in the us data that includes MBS that lack an agency guarantee.   and all the anecdotes suggest chinese names have been buying so called private MBS (tho i always assumed they were buying the higher rated tranches). it must be SAFE, the banks or some other financial institution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twofish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/#comment-98035</link>
		<dc:creator>Twofish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/#comment-98035</guid>
		<description>Also, not only do the GSE's not do subprime mortgages, they also insure their securities against defaults by the mortgagee.  If someone defaults on their home loans, then Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and Ginnie Mae guarantee payment.  In the case of Ginnie Mae, those gurantees are backed by the "full faith and credit" of the United States.  In the case of the other two, they have credit lines with the Federal government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, not only do the GSE&#8217;s not do subprime mortgages, they also insure their securities against defaults by the mortgagee.  If someone defaults on their home loans, then Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and Ginnie Mae guarantee payment.  In the case of Ginnie Mae, those gurantees are backed by the &#8220;full faith and credit&#8221; of the United States.  In the case of the other two, they have credit lines with the Federal government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twofish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/#comment-98034</link>
		<dc:creator>Twofish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/#comment-98034</guid>
		<description>Professor Yi is a bit confused since Ginnie Maes, Freddie Macs, and Fannie Maes don't have any subprime component in them.  Also, I don't see how any non-financial Chinese corporation can get the approval from SAFE to buy MBS's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Yi is a bit confused since Ginnie Maes, Freddie Macs, and Fannie Maes don&#8217;t have any subprime component in them.  Also, I don&#8217;t see how any non-financial Chinese corporation can get the approval from SAFE to buy MBS&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsetser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/#comment-98033</link>
		<dc:creator>bsetser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/#comment-98033</guid>
		<description>definitely off-topic, but sort of interesting --  are Chinese banks (using funds raised through swaps with the PBoC) among those who bought MBS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definitely off-topic, but sort of interesting &#8212;  are Chinese banks (using funds raised through swaps with the PBoC) among those who bought MBS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Chiang</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/#comment-98032</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Chiang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/#comment-98032</guid>
		<description>Off-topic,

Asia Times Online reports that the past surge in US Dollar purchases of US mortgage bonds comes from Chinese corporations, not the Chinese PBoC Central Bank
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China_Business/IG26Cb02.html

Yi Xianrong, a senior economist and finance professor with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, a central government think-tank, attributed the previous surge of mortgage-backed securities bought by Chinese companies to inexperience in conducting risk assessments and their miscalculation of the US property market.

"After seeing how the property prices in China kept soaring, these Chinese companies never thought of the US property market as having problems and they bought a lot of mortgage-backed securities, particularly in the past two years," Yi told Asia Times Online. "Apart from underestimating the level of risk, the better returns offered by MBS over US Treasury bonds also made the Chinese investors unable to judge the high risk of the US mortgage market."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off-topic,</p>
<p>Asia Times Online reports that the past surge in US Dollar purchases of US mortgage bonds comes from Chinese corporations, not the Chinese PBoC Central Bank<br />
<a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China_Business/IG26Cb02.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China_Business/IG26Cb02.html</a></p>
<p>Yi Xianrong, a senior economist and finance professor with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, a central government think-tank, attributed the previous surge of mortgage-backed securities bought by Chinese companies to inexperience in conducting risk assessments and their miscalculation of the US property market.</p>
<p>&#8220;After seeing how the property prices in China kept soaring, these Chinese companies never thought of the US property market as having problems and they bought a lot of mortgage-backed securities, particularly in the past two years,&#8221; Yi told Asia Times Online. &#8220;Apart from underestimating the level of risk, the better returns offered by MBS over US Treasury bonds also made the Chinese investors unable to judge the high risk of the US mortgage market.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Economista Non Gratia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/#comment-98031</link>
		<dc:creator>Economista Non Gratia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/07/25/kuwait-revalues-again/#comment-98031</guid>
		<description>First !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
