<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does the United States need a new dollar policy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Roberts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101493</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101493</guid>
		<description>Re Q of what to do ... re-focus on manufacturing of tangible goods,
including infrastructure projects.  Abundant need.  Tangible economy
is being neglected, has been for long time, while financial economy
bloats.  Too much time/talent/capital chasing multi-layered financial
concepts.  My bet is on the currently unloved activity, making stuff
that is built to last.  Weapons do not count .. they are throw-away.
Housing surplus not a bad thing, just financial structure is too weak
to sustain the build-out and distribution to those needing housing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Q of what to do &#8230; re-focus on manufacturing of tangible goods,<br />
including infrastructure projects.  Abundant need.  Tangible economy<br />
is being neglected, has been for long time, while financial economy<br />
bloats.  Too much time/talent/capital chasing multi-layered financial<br />
concepts.  My bet is on the currently unloved activity, making stuff<br />
that is built to last.  Weapons do not count .. they are throw-away.<br />
Housing surplus not a bad thing, just financial structure is too weak<br />
to sustain the build-out and distribution to those needing housing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asian Man</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101492</link>
		<dc:creator>Asian Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101492</guid>
		<description>Rather than a policy change, a more interesting question would be does the US need to rename its currency to perhaps &quot;New Dollar = N$&quot; like Taiwan did with its &quot;New Taiwan = NT&quot; currency?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than a policy change, a more interesting question would be does the US need to rename its currency to perhaps &#8220;New Dollar = N$&#8221; like Taiwan did with its &#8220;New Taiwan = NT&#8221; currency?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassandra</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101491</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101491</guid>
		<description>DC - &quot;Why should the Chinese agree to castrate their own domestic economy and unemploy millions of workers?&quot;

 Firstly, &quot;castrate&quot; is the wrong word Dav-o. In fact, untethering the RmB from the USD is metaphorically the opposite, freeing the chinese currency unit to grow to its full and glorious size.  Secondly, because flawed as it is, the international monetary system as it exists currently - that is a system predicated upon market forces of currency and exchange rates along with more or less internationally-civic-minded fiscal, monetary and trade policies together working against divergent imbalances to promote adustment convergence - it  is the only one we have. So unless China has an alternative, I suggest that China (and Japan, and the GCCs, and the US Admin and Congress) not trash the current one until they&#039;ve agreed to something better to put in its place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DC &#8211; &#8220;Why should the Chinese agree to castrate their own domestic economy and unemploy millions of workers?&#8221;</p>
<p> Firstly, &#8220;castrate&#8221; is the wrong word Dav-o. In fact, untethering the RmB from the USD is metaphorically the opposite, freeing the chinese currency unit to grow to its full and glorious size.  Secondly, because flawed as it is, the international monetary system as it exists currently &#8211; that is a system predicated upon market forces of currency and exchange rates along with more or less internationally-civic-minded fiscal, monetary and trade policies together working against divergent imbalances to promote adustment convergence &#8211; it  is the only one we have. So unless China has an alternative, I suggest that China (and Japan, and the GCCs, and the US Admin and Congress) not trash the current one until they&#8217;ve agreed to something better to put in its place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle Burkhead</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101490</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle Burkhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101490</guid>
		<description>Guest on 2007-10-29 10:05:25
&lt;i&gt;&quot;Brad asks: &quot;...one where the US directs its own macro policy choices at XR stability b/c the risks of not doing so are now so high?&quot;

&quot;How would you propose doing that? With a brutal rise in the interest rate? If you want a stable dollar then something else has to fluctuate to compensate, right? What would you want that to be?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s what I am wondering too. What macro policy choices are available?

&lt;i&gt;&quot;The world economy would be better off if a fall in the US deficit, not a rise in China&#039;s already large surplus, led to a fall in the combined Sinoamerican current account deficit.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, but how could a fall in the US deficit come about? What could the US export in large enough quantities to make a difference? Outsourcing cannot be reversed overnight. Industries cannot be rebuilt overnight (assuming anybody in Washington even thinks in those terms).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guest on 2007-10-29 10:05:25<br />
<i>&#8220;Brad asks: &#8220;&#8230;one where the US directs its own macro policy choices at XR stability b/c the risks of not doing so are now so high?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;How would you propose doing that? With a brutal rise in the interest rate? If you want a stable dollar then something else has to fluctuate to compensate, right? What would you want that to be?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I am wondering too. What macro policy choices are available?</p>
<p><i>&#8220;The world economy would be better off if a fall in the US deficit, not a rise in China&#8217;s already large surplus, led to a fall in the combined Sinoamerican current account deficit.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Yes, but how could a fall in the US deficit come about? What could the US export in large enough quantities to make a difference? Outsourcing cannot be reversed overnight. Industries cannot be rebuilt overnight (assuming anybody in Washington even thinks in those terms).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101489</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101489</guid>
		<description>Something for you to think about, Brad:


Something for me to think about
Nicholas Carr offers me advice:

Because blogging is such a personal pursuit, with strong and immediate ego-rewards, it can be irrationally seductive, particularly to highly competitive overachievers. The hazard - and this applies as well to disciplines beyond economics - is that extraordinarily talented individuals may end up, like lab mice drinking sugar water, spending more time blogging than they should, even though their comparative advantage is smaller in blogging than it is elsewhere. Distorted by noneconomic but nonetheless powerful rewards, the idea market would become less efficient than it should be, and we&#039;d all suffer as a result. The real danger, in other words, may not be that the &quot;lemons&quot; - the &quot;tolerable bloggers&quot; - will take over as the mainstays of the blogosphere but that they won&#039;t.

Please stop blogging, Greg Mankiw. You have better things to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something for you to think about, Brad:</p>
<p>Something for me to think about<br />
Nicholas Carr offers me advice:</p>
<p>Because blogging is such a personal pursuit, with strong and immediate ego-rewards, it can be irrationally seductive, particularly to highly competitive overachievers. The hazard &#8211; and this applies as well to disciplines beyond economics &#8211; is that extraordinarily talented individuals may end up, like lab mice drinking sugar water, spending more time blogging than they should, even though their comparative advantage is smaller in blogging than it is elsewhere. Distorted by noneconomic but nonetheless powerful rewards, the idea market would become less efficient than it should be, and we&#8217;d all suffer as a result. The real danger, in other words, may not be that the &#8220;lemons&#8221; &#8211; the &#8220;tolerable bloggers&#8221; &#8211; will take over as the mainstays of the blogosphere but that they won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Please stop blogging, Greg Mankiw. You have better things to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest 15:56</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101488</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest 15:56</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101488</guid>
		<description>The Chinese elite have manipulated /controlled their exchange rate to ensure export lead growth. Development of the economy and employment for its citizens is the strategic objective.

The US elite have manipulated, hoodwinked and sold out middle America under the mantra of free trade. profit growth via wage arbitrage and wealth for the wealthy few is the strategic objective.

This complementary arrangement has been win win for the elites on both sides until now. We are at an inflection point as the imbalances caused by this arrangement can now no longer be ignored.

Both sides know this and both sides are realigning both their objectives and strategies. It is obvious the US have opted to weaken the dollar in order to deal with the deficit problem, stimulate exports and revive industry and force the Chinese into their next move.

What the Chinese have in store I´m not sure but its certainly becoming a game of macroeconomic chess with Europe stuck in the middle and perhaps wishing they could flip the board.

May the best man win although it doesn´t really matter as I think we´ll all be screwed in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chinese elite have manipulated /controlled their exchange rate to ensure export lead growth. Development of the economy and employment for its citizens is the strategic objective.</p>
<p>The US elite have manipulated, hoodwinked and sold out middle America under the mantra of free trade. profit growth via wage arbitrage and wealth for the wealthy few is the strategic objective.</p>
<p>This complementary arrangement has been win win for the elites on both sides until now. We are at an inflection point as the imbalances caused by this arrangement can now no longer be ignored.</p>
<p>Both sides know this and both sides are realigning both their objectives and strategies. It is obvious the US have opted to weaken the dollar in order to deal with the deficit problem, stimulate exports and revive industry and force the Chinese into their next move.</p>
<p>What the Chinese have in store I´m not sure but its certainly becoming a game of macroeconomic chess with Europe stuck in the middle and perhaps wishing they could flip the board.</p>
<p>May the best man win although it doesn´t really matter as I think we´ll all be screwed in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101487</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101487</guid>
		<description>&quot;Goldman Sachs banksters move to control Western Central Banks&quot;

&quot;Funny how Goldman Sachs alumni Robert Rubin has been involved in some fashion with every major financial corruption scandal in the past two decades.&quot;

It is utterly outrageous that Brad Setser has allowed the cowardly Chiang with his scurrilous charges against Robert Rubin, his crackpot conspiracy theories and his thinly-veiled anti-Semitism to continue to post here.

In an ideal world, Chiang, this supporter of the most monstrous regime since Adolf Hitler&#039;s would be horsewhipped and then thrown out of the country. We obviously do not live in an ideal world, but the least Dr. Setser could do is ban this despicable individual from posting here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Goldman Sachs banksters move to control Western Central Banks&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Funny how Goldman Sachs alumni Robert Rubin has been involved in some fashion with every major financial corruption scandal in the past two decades.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is utterly outrageous that Brad Setser has allowed the cowardly Chiang with his scurrilous charges against Robert Rubin, his crackpot conspiracy theories and his thinly-veiled anti-Semitism to continue to post here.</p>
<p>In an ideal world, Chiang, this supporter of the most monstrous regime since Adolf Hitler&#8217;s would be horsewhipped and then thrown out of the country. We obviously do not live in an ideal world, but the least Dr. Setser could do is ban this despicable individual from posting here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101486</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101486</guid>
		<description>Too bad, Brad.

You do excellent work.

But the quality of the comments on your blog is morphing into toxic waste.

Time for some house cleaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad, Brad.</p>
<p>You do excellent work.</p>
<p>But the quality of the comments on your blog is morphing into toxic waste.</p>
<p>Time for some house cleaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gillies</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101485</link>
		<dc:creator>gillies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101485</guid>
		<description>the dollar is worthless paper, and the only thing that buys you certain strategic commodities.  well, which is it ? make your minds up.  this is sloppy thinking.  can&#039;t be both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the dollar is worthless paper, and the only thing that buys you certain strategic commodities.  well, which is it ? make your minds up.  this is sloppy thinking.  can&#8217;t be both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101484</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2007/10/29/does-the-united-states-need-a-new-dollar-policy/#comment-101484</guid>
		<description>&quot;Washington Hegemony&quot;: a hopelessly inaccurate construct   developed and propagated by a stooge of the second directorate of the People&#039;s Liberation Army. It&#039;s Washington&#039;s fault that PBOC is forced to intervene, dammit!  Blame Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley (ex-Stephen Roach, of course) for the negative real interest rates in China! Nothing to do with Beijing, no sirree!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Washington Hegemony&#8221;: a hopelessly inaccurate construct   developed and propagated by a stooge of the second directorate of the People&#8217;s Liberation Army. It&#8217;s Washington&#8217;s fault that PBOC is forced to intervene, dammit!  Blame Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley (ex-Stephen Roach, of course) for the negative real interest rates in China! Nothing to do with Beijing, no sirree!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

