<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It is nice to have a bit of high profile support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsetser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105577</link>
		<dc:creator>bsetser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105577</guid>
		<description>rebel -- you are right.

but gas taxes are still considered political suidcide in the us.  in some deep sense, the us has the mentality of a major oil exporter (keep oil cheap) not a big importer.  a holdover from 1900-1950 ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rebel &#8212; you are right.</p>
<p>but gas taxes are still considered political suidcide in the us.  in some deep sense, the us has the mentality of a major oil exporter (keep oil cheap) not a big importer.  a holdover from 1900-1950 &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taxpayer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105576</link>
		<dc:creator>Taxpayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105576</guid>
		<description>Just to give you an idea of how much resetting we might expect.
Some Australian commentators are predicting $1.2o for AU$1.
The AU$ breezed through 90 cents a few days ago.
Getting into those currencies must seem like easy money for those holding US$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to give you an idea of how much resetting we might expect.<br />
Some Australian commentators are predicting $1.2o for AU$1.<br />
The AU$ breezed through 90 cents a few days ago.<br />
Getting into those currencies must seem like easy money for those holding US$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RebelEconomist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105575</link>
		<dc:creator>RebelEconomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105575</guid>
		<description>It is insane that the consumers of oil have allowed its price to rise so high, given that (1) it is likely that fossil fuels cause adverse climate change, (2) we know that burning oil generates other pollution, and (3) oil tends to come from politically risky places.  Its consumption should be so heavily taxed that the producers should be almost giving it away by now.  America should tax petroleum more and emerging Asia should subsidise it less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is insane that the consumers of oil have allowed its price to rise so high, given that (1) it is likely that fossil fuels cause adverse climate change, (2) we know that burning oil generates other pollution, and (3) oil tends to come from politically risky places.  Its consumption should be so heavily taxed that the producers should be almost giving it away by now.  America should tax petroleum more and emerging Asia should subsidise it less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taxpayer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105574</link>
		<dc:creator>Taxpayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105574</guid>
		<description>@ BSetser &quot;At least on the case for more exchange rate flexibility in the Gulf....&quot;

My guess is that a lot of dollars will be pouring into the riyal and other pegged currencies that don&#039;t have exchange controls.
This will be increasing the local money supplies and causing inflation.
Maybe this is what Greenspan meant about causing inflation.
This will pressure them to float.
The reason that money is piling into these currencies is that everybody must know by now that the US$ has to devalue to help fix it&#039;s problem.
They are protecting their post devaluation dollar purchasing power.
Better float sooner than later, I&#039;d say the Hungarians are the start of a trend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ BSetser &#8220;At least on the case for more exchange rate flexibility in the Gulf&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>My guess is that a lot of dollars will be pouring into the riyal and other pegged currencies that don&#8217;t have exchange controls.<br />
This will be increasing the local money supplies and causing inflation.<br />
Maybe this is what Greenspan meant about causing inflation.<br />
This will pressure them to float.<br />
The reason that money is piling into these currencies is that everybody must know by now that the US$ has to devalue to help fix it&#8217;s problem.<br />
They are protecting their post devaluation dollar purchasing power.<br />
Better float sooner than later, I&#8217;d say the Hungarians are the start of a trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105573</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105573</guid>
		<description>You may be right, in a sense. Nonetheless, it seems sensible to me to diversify--not all eggs in the oil basket.  The ME seems to want to be the new financial capital, for example; interested also in shipping and maritime related activities.

What is happening is not easy to capture in a few sentences.  Already there is a strong move to find alternate sources of energy--global warming is one incentive; the other is oil as a soon to be dwindling commodity.  The noise for other sources grows daily in the press.  And OPEC seems to have lost the power to control the price of oil with more pumping.  Certainly, it is aware of the enormous stress the high price of oil is having.

(I think May 2005 still stands as a high point for crude...not sure) SA certainly did not heed...could not heed..GW&#039;s plea for more oil.

The increasing cost of energy is inflationary...overcoming the deflationary effect of globalization.  Talk of peak oil was the province of those thought as &quot;nut&quot; cases.

I agree that at this point it would be wise now to diversify away from the dollar.

All of this has happened so quickly...really.  Not too long ago, we had started to talk about China&#039;s opaque black currency box; we were all speculating on how fast they would allow their currency to rise.  But China was...and still is...on a mission to develop as rapidly as possible. As I have said many times, I don&#039;t see how they are going to do it....the cost of energy alone is going to curtail their efforts.  Global warming and pollution...well, you know what I think there.  China is a Johnny-Come-Lately to the party.

In some ways, I think events in many areas have moved faster than anyone expected...and far more out of control than anyone thought could happen. I, for one, sense it.

I think we are fast approaching the time when events are in the saddle, as Emerson said, and they ride mankind. (But then I am always given to hyperbole lol)


Sorry, if I ramble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be right, in a sense. Nonetheless, it seems sensible to me to diversify&#8211;not all eggs in the oil basket.  The ME seems to want to be the new financial capital, for example; interested also in shipping and maritime related activities.</p>
<p>What is happening is not easy to capture in a few sentences.  Already there is a strong move to find alternate sources of energy&#8211;global warming is one incentive; the other is oil as a soon to be dwindling commodity.  The noise for other sources grows daily in the press.  And OPEC seems to have lost the power to control the price of oil with more pumping.  Certainly, it is aware of the enormous stress the high price of oil is having.</p>
<p>(I think May 2005 still stands as a high point for crude&#8230;not sure) SA certainly did not heed&#8230;could not heed..GW&#8217;s plea for more oil.</p>
<p>The increasing cost of energy is inflationary&#8230;overcoming the deflationary effect of globalization.  Talk of peak oil was the province of those thought as &#8220;nut&#8221; cases.</p>
<p>I agree that at this point it would be wise now to diversify away from the dollar.</p>
<p>All of this has happened so quickly&#8230;really.  Not too long ago, we had started to talk about China&#8217;s opaque black currency box; we were all speculating on how fast they would allow their currency to rise.  But China was&#8230;and still is&#8230;on a mission to develop as rapidly as possible. As I have said many times, I don&#8217;t see how they are going to do it&#8230;.the cost of energy alone is going to curtail their efforts.  Global warming and pollution&#8230;well, you know what I think there.  China is a Johnny-Come-Lately to the party.</p>
<p>In some ways, I think events in many areas have moved faster than anyone expected&#8230;and far more out of control than anyone thought could happen. I, for one, sense it.</p>
<p>I think we are fast approaching the time when events are in the saddle, as Emerson said, and they ride mankind. (But then I am always given to hyperbole lol)</p>
<p>Sorry, if I ramble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsetser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105572</link>
		<dc:creator>bsetser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105572</guid>
		<description>Stormy i think if you were a saudi prince you wouldn&#039;t worry that much about the end of the age of oil -- everyone else is likely to run out first (tho i guess not in simmons more extreme scenario).

More importantly, i don&#039;t think you would want to have as much of your wealth tied up in the dollar as is now the case.  the US is the oil importing region with the biggest current account deficit.  it also likely accounts for the majority of the saudis external assets.  that isn&#039;t a great combination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stormy i think if you were a saudi prince you wouldn&#8217;t worry that much about the end of the age of oil &#8212; everyone else is likely to run out first (tho i guess not in simmons more extreme scenario).</p>
<p>More importantly, i don&#8217;t think you would want to have as much of your wealth tied up in the dollar as is now the case.  the US is the oil importing region with the biggest current account deficit.  it also likely accounts for the majority of the saudis external assets.  that isn&#8217;t a great combination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105571</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105571</guid>
		<description>Suppose the Saudis knew what Matt Simmons has suspected and what the Saudis have kept hidden: That the age of oil is closing and that their own wells are close to or are at peak?

If you were a Saudi prince, what would you do?  Seems to me he would play his cards precisely as they have been played.  Keep the peg so that the purchase of other assets are possible.  Create new niches for yourself.

Peak oil does not mean that oil will run dry, just that production capacity will diminish.   Consider what is happening a &quot;transition&quot; game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suppose the Saudis knew what Matt Simmons has suspected and what the Saudis have kept hidden: That the age of oil is closing and that their own wells are close to or are at peak?</p>
<p>If you were a Saudi prince, what would you do?  Seems to me he would play his cards precisely as they have been played.  Keep the peg so that the purchase of other assets are possible.  Create new niches for yourself.</p>
<p>Peak oil does not mean that oil will run dry, just that production capacity will diminish.   Consider what is happening a &#8220;transition&#8221; game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsetser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105570</link>
		<dc:creator>bsetser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105570</guid>
		<description>Indian banker -- thanks for highlighting the florint&#039;s float.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indian banker &#8212; thanks for highlighting the florint&#8217;s float.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105569</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105569</guid>
		<description>S&amp;P ratings for MBIA are a joke. Let&#039;s Do The Math
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/12/mbia-admits-306-billion-cdo-exposure.html

In MBIA Admits $30.6 Billion CDO Exposure we saw that in addition to the $30.6 billion in worthless CDOs that it guarantees, MBIA has an additional $8.1 billion in worthless CDO squared (CDOs of CDOs) securities that it guarantees. That&#039;s makes MBIA&#039;s total CDO exposure $38.7 billion. And it hid that for months. It has total cash of $5.73 billion. Even if one pretends those CDOs will be worth 50% on the dollar, how does one possibly get AAA out of that mess?

1. MBIA hid $38.6 billion in CDO exposure for months
2. MBIA Posted a loss of $1.93 billion last year
3. MBIA CEO will not sign off on results
4. MBIA may have losses of $5.5 billion before tax, eliminating its entire capital cushion.
5. MBIA wants to hide losses for up to 5 years, hoping nothing else blows up, and future earnings cover the losses.

To top it all off, earlier today the S&amp;P Sniffed Horse Hockey and Called it a Rose, by reaffirming the AAA rating of MBIA and Ambac. What a complete joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S&#038;P ratings for MBIA are a joke. Let&#8217;s Do The Math<br />
<a href="http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/12/mbia-admits-306-billion-cdo-exposure.html" rel="nofollow">http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/12/mbia-admits-306-billion-cdo-exposure.html</a></p>
<p>In MBIA Admits $30.6 Billion CDO Exposure we saw that in addition to the $30.6 billion in worthless CDOs that it guarantees, MBIA has an additional $8.1 billion in worthless CDO squared (CDOs of CDOs) securities that it guarantees. That&#8217;s makes MBIA&#8217;s total CDO exposure $38.7 billion. And it hid that for months. It has total cash of $5.73 billion. Even if one pretends those CDOs will be worth 50% on the dollar, how does one possibly get AAA out of that mess?</p>
<p>1. MBIA hid $38.6 billion in CDO exposure for months<br />
2. MBIA Posted a loss of $1.93 billion last year<br />
3. MBIA CEO will not sign off on results<br />
4. MBIA may have losses of $5.5 billion before tax, eliminating its entire capital cushion.<br />
5. MBIA wants to hide losses for up to 5 years, hoping nothing else blows up, and future earnings cover the losses.</p>
<p>To top it all off, earlier today the S&#038;P Sniffed Horse Hockey and Called it a Rose, by reaffirming the AAA rating of MBIA and Ambac. What a complete joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105568</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/25/it-is-nice-to-have-a-bit-of-high-profile/#comment-105568</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.morganstanley.com/views/gef/archive/2008/20080222-Fri.html&quot;&gt;A Petrodollar Tsunami Warning&lt;/a&gt;
At US$100 a barrel, the value of the total proven oil reserves in the world is US$121 trillion, US$48 trillion of which belongs to the GCC countries.  On a flow basis, annual oil export receipts of OPEC countries total some US$1.3 trillion, at US$100 a barrel.  High oil prices, in short, will lead to a significant transfer of financial power to the petrodollar holders.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/25/world/middleeast/25economy.html?ex=1361682000&amp;en=e3927f4d510a6d16&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&quot;&gt;Rising Inflation Creates Unease in Middle East&lt;/a&gt;
Inflation, caused in part by the skyrocketing price of oil, is pushing many ordinary people toward poverty even as oil money stimulates a new surge of economic growth in the gulf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.morganstanley.com/views/gef/archive/2008/20080222-Fri.html">A Petrodollar Tsunami Warning</a><br />
At US$100 a barrel, the value of the total proven oil reserves in the world is US$121 trillion, US$48 trillion of which belongs to the GCC countries.  On a flow basis, annual oil export receipts of OPEC countries total some US$1.3 trillion, at US$100 a barrel.  High oil prices, in short, will lead to a significant transfer of financial power to the petrodollar holders.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/25/world/middleeast/25economy.html?ex=1361682000&#038;en=e3927f4d510a6d16&#038;ei=5088&#038;partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss">Rising Inflation Creates Unease in Middle East</a><br />
Inflation, caused in part by the skyrocketing price of oil, is pushing many ordinary people toward poverty even as oil money stimulates a new surge of economic growth in the gulf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

