<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $1 trillion, $100, $1.50</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taxpayer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105725</link>
		<dc:creator>Taxpayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 17:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105725</guid>
		<description>&quot;..crisis has exposed the financial system as a whingeing bully.&quot;
Written by Judy Yeo on 2008-03-01 19:53:59

That strikes a chord.
Adam Smith&#039;s &#039;self interest&#039; does not equate to selfishness, which is often how it is interpreted by the whingeing bullies.
The greed is good philosophy.
Self interested actions are not purely selfish as Smith himself alludes to when he says that we are all incompetent without social, cultural and familial support.
Self interest has a component that acknowledges this reality and so it also supports society, culture, family, rule of law etc.
Smith sees the freedom to trade as an essential part of our support network and as an expression of our &#039;self evident&#039; equality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;..crisis has exposed the financial system as a whingeing bully.&#8221;<br />
Written by Judy Yeo on 2008-03-01 19:53:59</p>
<p>That strikes a chord.<br />
Adam Smith&#8217;s &#8216;self interest&#8217; does not equate to selfishness, which is often how it is interpreted by the whingeing bullies.<br />
The greed is good philosophy.<br />
Self interested actions are not purely selfish as Smith himself alludes to when he says that we are all incompetent without social, cultural and familial support.<br />
Self interest has a component that acknowledges this reality and so it also supports society, culture, family, rule of law etc.<br />
Smith sees the freedom to trade as an essential part of our support network and as an expression of our &#8216;self evident&#8217; equality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Yeo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105724</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Yeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105724</guid>
		<description>Read Martin Wolf&#039;s piece , very middle of the path, Buffett&#039;s regular commentary was a lot more entertaining and a voice less tinged with xenophobia and paranoia?!

Brad, those headlines are kinda indicative of the high emotions surrounding any financial crisis but do not represent even 10% of the suffering and drastic measures imposed on the asian nations involved. The resolve of never again might help explain the drive behind ever higher reserves.If there&#039;s humour surrounding the present crisis, it may just be that the harsh principles preached by the IMF and western countries are now so blatantly being ignored in favour of more palatable policies, as a brit friend has noted, the present crisis has exposed the financial system as a whingeing bully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read Martin Wolf&#8217;s piece , very middle of the path, Buffett&#8217;s regular commentary was a lot more entertaining and a voice less tinged with xenophobia and paranoia?!</p>
<p>Brad, those headlines are kinda indicative of the high emotions surrounding any financial crisis but do not represent even 10% of the suffering and drastic measures imposed on the asian nations involved. The resolve of never again might help explain the drive behind ever higher reserves.If there&#8217;s humour surrounding the present crisis, it may just be that the harsh principles preached by the IMF and western countries are now so blatantly being ignored in favour of more palatable policies, as a brit friend has noted, the present crisis has exposed the financial system as a whingeing bully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105723</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 07:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105723</guid>
		<description>5 TRILLION down the drain in Iraq, according now to Stiglitz. And for what? To save us from &quot;terrorism&quot; says Brownback. Yeah sure, I remember how Saddam H. was going to send robots flying over the USA to drop his nukes on us, according to the Pentagon. Sure he was. Thank God 5 trillion well spent has saved us from that.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=acXcm.yk56Ko&amp;refer=economy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5 TRILLION down the drain in Iraq, according now to Stiglitz. And for what? To save us from &#8220;terrorism&#8221; says Brownback. Yeah sure, I remember how Saddam H. was going to send robots flying over the USA to drop his nukes on us, according to the Pentagon. Sure he was. Thank God 5 trillion well spent has saved us from that.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&#038;sid=acXcm.yk56Ko&#038;refer=economy" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&#038;sid=acXcm.yk56Ko&#038;refer=economy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsetser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105722</link>
		<dc:creator>bsetser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105722</guid>
		<description>i went with the bond conundrum --

the material i had on the dollar was more heat than light.

Majorajam -- thanks, by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i went with the bond conundrum &#8211;</p>
<p>the material i had on the dollar was more heat than light.</p>
<p>Majorajam &#8212; thanks, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsetser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105721</link>
		<dc:creator>bsetser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105721</guid>
		<description>anonymous ibid.  I am afraid I do not know.   better eurozone news/ hawkish ECB comments?   the puzzle is that I don&#039;t think US rate expectations have changed all that much, and while the news flow out of the us has been bad, i am not sure it has been worse than in January.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anonymous ibid.  I am afraid I do not know.   better eurozone news/ hawkish ECB comments?   the puzzle is that I don&#8217;t think US rate expectations have changed all that much, and while the news flow out of the us has been bad, i am not sure it has been worse than in January.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105720</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105720</guid>
		<description>Brad, please post some more on the USD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad, please post some more on the USD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qingdao</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105719</link>
		<dc:creator>Qingdao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105719</guid>
		<description>My vote: bond conundrum; more BS (!)is always better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My vote: bond conundrum; more BS (!)is always better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous ibid.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105718</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous ibid.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105718</guid>
		<description>Brad, I vote for some comments on the dollar. The recent movement vs. the Euro has been so swift that it makes me think we could be entering a panic. I&#039;d like to know your thoughts on why the sharp movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad, I vote for some comments on the dollar. The recent movement vs. the Euro has been so swift that it makes me think we could be entering a panic. I&#8217;d like to know your thoughts on why the sharp movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moldbug</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105717</link>
		<dc:creator>moldbug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105717</guid>
		<description>Jean-Paul Villain, despite sthe coolest name of all time, is hardly comparable to the young bsetser!  The US relationship with Latin America is quite paternal and has been for the last 200 years or so.  It&#039;s hard to see how the Chinese and Gulfers could develop this kind of avuncular solicitude.

That said, there are certainly some zip codes near me where the PLA could do some real good.  But getting to know one&#039;s creditors is a long way from actually handing over the keys.

The BWII financiers are making two major decisions relevant to Americans: holding pegs which require them to buy large numbers of dollars, and keeping these funds in dollar securities rather than playing &quot;hot potato&quot; with them.

I think it&#039;s safe to say both these choices are political, not financial.  They are made in extremely opaque ways, but neither (though perhaps to a small degree the second) seems to be at CIC or ADIA.

Allocating dollar investments within the US financial system has its effect, but it can be overstated.  For example, if SWFs stop buying bonds entirely and buy only equities, they will push up P/Es and squeeze private money back into the bond market.  In theory.  If you believe in efficient markets.

So I took the comment a little more generally - Americans should certainly know that they are in this strange relationship with foreign governments, and understand what said governments are gettting out of the game.  I don&#039;t think anyone has suggested that their intentions are charitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jean-Paul Villain, despite sthe coolest name of all time, is hardly comparable to the young bsetser!  The US relationship with Latin America is quite paternal and has been for the last 200 years or so.  It&#8217;s hard to see how the Chinese and Gulfers could develop this kind of avuncular solicitude.</p>
<p>That said, there are certainly some zip codes near me where the PLA could do some real good.  But getting to know one&#8217;s creditors is a long way from actually handing over the keys.</p>
<p>The BWII financiers are making two major decisions relevant to Americans: holding pegs which require them to buy large numbers of dollars, and keeping these funds in dollar securities rather than playing &#8220;hot potato&#8221; with them.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s safe to say both these choices are political, not financial.  They are made in extremely opaque ways, but neither (though perhaps to a small degree the second) seems to be at CIC or ADIA.</p>
<p>Allocating dollar investments within the US financial system has its effect, but it can be overstated.  For example, if SWFs stop buying bonds entirely and buy only equities, they will push up P/Es and squeeze private money back into the bond market.  In theory.  If you believe in efficient markets.</p>
<p>So I took the comment a little more generally &#8211; Americans should certainly know that they are in this strange relationship with foreign governments, and understand what said governments are gettting out of the game.  I don&#8217;t think anyone has suggested that their intentions are charitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsetser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105716</link>
		<dc:creator>bsetser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/02/28/1-trillion-100-1-50/#comment-105716</guid>
		<description>A question -- for tomorrow, should i post something short and (not so) sweet on the dollar, or something deeply technical on the bond conundrum?  I&#039;ll be traveling, so i won&#039;t be able be able to mind the shop closely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question &#8212; for tomorrow, should i post something short and (not so) sweet on the dollar, or something deeply technical on the bond conundrum?  I&#8217;ll be traveling, so i won&#8217;t be able be able to mind the shop closely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

