<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dark flows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:40:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad Setser: Follow the Money &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Official flows now make up the majority of gross flows to the US</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114588</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Setser: Follow the Money &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Official flows now make up the majority of gross flows to the US</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114588</guid>
		<description>[...] Looking ahead, I expect official flows to fall &#8212; largely because the US trade deficit is now liekly to fall rapidly start. And the sale of US assets abroad may provide much more financing for the US deficit than in the past. But over the past four quarters, the scale of official inflows truly cannot be understated. Personally I think $735b is on the low side, given the likely scale of dollar reserve growth. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Looking ahead, I expect official flows to fall &#8212; largely because the US trade deficit is now liekly to fall rapidly start. And the sale of US assets abroad may provide much more financing for the US deficit than in the past. But over the past four quarters, the scale of official inflows truly cannot be understated. Personally I think $735b is on the low side, given the likely scale of dollar reserve growth. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Richman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114234</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114234</guid>
		<description>Dave C.,

I liked your first comment on this thead so much that I have taken the liberty to republish it on our blog.

Howard Richman
www.tradeandtaxes.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave C.,</p>
<p>I liked your first comment on this thead so much that I have taken the liberty to republish it on our blog.</p>
<p>Howard Richman<br />
<a href="http://www.tradeandtaxes.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tradeandtaxes.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twofish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114231</link>
		<dc:creator>Twofish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114231</guid>
		<description>Also the SWF&#039;s *did* create a stabilizing force at least in the Shanghai equity markets.  News that CIC and Huijin were about to do buybacks of state-owned enterprises caused the markets to stabilize.  Also the Fed is trying to stabilize the credit markets basically by creating the world&#039;s largest SWF, which is what the Federal Reserve Bank is rapidly becoming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also the SWF&#8217;s *did* create a stabilizing force at least in the Shanghai equity markets.  News that CIC and Huijin were about to do buybacks of state-owned enterprises caused the markets to stabilize.  Also the Fed is trying to stabilize the credit markets basically by creating the world&#8217;s largest SWF, which is what the Federal Reserve Bank is rapidly becoming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jboss</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114230</link>
		<dc:creator>jboss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 08:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114230</guid>
		<description>LB:
why does roubini ‘fear’ the escape of capital from hedge funds? do they contribute to any real substantial productivity whatsoever?

That was the missing piece, I was looking for, of course. Quarterly outflows. 
My estimate from what I&#039;ve seen in EM equity and currencies is: they were ugly.

And yes, they do contribute to real productivity. A lot actually.
Not the quants. But funds with a long term horizon doing actual research.

Small companies in &quot;commodities extraction&quot; in countries with insufficient internal savings depend on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LB:<br />
why does roubini ‘fear’ the escape of capital from hedge funds? do they contribute to any real substantial productivity whatsoever?</p>
<p>That was the missing piece, I was looking for, of course. Quarterly outflows.<br />
My estimate from what I&#8217;ve seen in EM equity and currencies is: they were ugly.</p>
<p>And yes, they do contribute to real productivity. A lot actually.<br />
Not the quants. But funds with a long term horizon doing actual research.</p>
<p>Small companies in &#8220;commodities extraction&#8221; in countries with insufficient internal savings depend on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cedric Regula</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114227</link>
		<dc:creator>Cedric Regula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114227</guid>
		<description>I read a brief comment from a couple days stating that $78B of it had something to do with alt energy investment, but nothing more on that. That is not necessarily a good thing either depending on what it is they are funding.

That sounds like too big a piece of the $110 final number anyway, if they are also doing things like modifying the alternative minimum tax.

So I figure I just wait and see if they tell us what the final itemized list is after it gets passed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read a brief comment from a couple days stating that $78B of it had something to do with alt energy investment, but nothing more on that. That is not necessarily a good thing either depending on what it is they are funding.</p>
<p>That sounds like too big a piece of the $110 final number anyway, if they are also doing things like modifying the alternative minimum tax.</p>
<p>So I figure I just wait and see if they tell us what the final itemized list is after it gets passed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsetser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114226</link>
		<dc:creator>bsetser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 05:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114226</guid>
		<description>The &quot;dark&quot; flows generally come from China and the Gulf -- tho there are others who contribute as well.   Singapore&#039;s GIC for example doesn&#039;t disclose much .. 

anyone know more about the $110b in biz tax breaks in the senate bill?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;dark&#8221; flows generally come from China and the Gulf &#8212; tho there are others who contribute as well.   Singapore&#8217;s GIC for example doesn&#8217;t disclose much .. </p>
<p>anyone know more about the $110b in biz tax breaks in the senate bill?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cedric Regula</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114220</link>
		<dc:creator>Cedric Regula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114220</guid>
		<description>Ms. or Mrs. Yeo: how’s the latest vote going?

Add a tax cut cut to a spending bill and you can get anything to pass. Don&#039;t buy US stock yet, it still needs to be passed by the House. Be sure to add to your savings account, we are going to need the money. 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Even as the Senate voted, House leaders were hunting for the 12 votes they would need to turn around Monday&#039;s 228-205 defeat. They were especially targeting the 133 Republicans who voted &quot;no.&quot;

Their opposition appeared to be easing after the Senate added $110 billion in tax breaks for businesses and the middle class, plus a provision to raise, from $100,000 to $250,000, the cap on federal deposit insurance.

They were also cheering a decision Tuesday by the Securities and Exchange Commission to ease rules that force companies to devalue assets on their balance sheets to reflect the price they can get on the market.

There were worries, though, that the tax breaks would cause some conservative-leaning Democrats who voted for the rescue Monday to abandon it because it would swell the federal deficit.

&quot;I&#039;m concerned about that,&quot; said Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., the majority leader.

As revised by the Senate, the package extends several tax breaks popular with businesses. It would keep the alternative minimum tax from hitting 20 million middle-income Americans and provide $8 billion in tax relief for those hit by natural disasters in the Midwest, Texas and Louisiana.

It doesn&#039;t designate a way to pay for many of the tax cuts, though, angering the House&#039;s band of conservative &quot;Blue Dog&quot; Democrats.&quot;

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081001/financial_meltdown.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. or Mrs. Yeo: how’s the latest vote going?</p>
<p>Add a tax cut cut to a spending bill and you can get anything to pass. Don&#8217;t buy US stock yet, it still needs to be passed by the House. Be sure to add to your savings account, we are going to need the money. </p>
<p>++++++++++++++++++++++++++<br />
Even as the Senate voted, House leaders were hunting for the 12 votes they would need to turn around Monday&#8217;s 228-205 defeat. They were especially targeting the 133 Republicans who voted &#8220;no.&#8221;</p>
<p>Their opposition appeared to be easing after the Senate added $110 billion in tax breaks for businesses and the middle class, plus a provision to raise, from $100,000 to $250,000, the cap on federal deposit insurance.</p>
<p>They were also cheering a decision Tuesday by the Securities and Exchange Commission to ease rules that force companies to devalue assets on their balance sheets to reflect the price they can get on the market.</p>
<p>There were worries, though, that the tax breaks would cause some conservative-leaning Democrats who voted for the rescue Monday to abandon it because it would swell the federal deficit.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m concerned about that,&#8221; said Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., the majority leader.</p>
<p>As revised by the Senate, the package extends several tax breaks popular with businesses. It would keep the alternative minimum tax from hitting 20 million middle-income Americans and provide $8 billion in tax relief for those hit by natural disasters in the Midwest, Texas and Louisiana.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t designate a way to pay for many of the tax cuts, though, angering the House&#8217;s band of conservative &#8220;Blue Dog&#8221; Democrats.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081001/financial_meltdown.html" rel="nofollow">http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081001/financial_meltdown.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Yeo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114216</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Yeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114216</guid>
		<description>Oh dear, Brad, you&#039;re spounding more and more Star Wars, not in terms of fantasy/sci-fi but the implied &quot;moral battle&quot; - c&#039;mon, there&#039;s hardly a skywalker vs the empire battle here, if anything, everyone has just that bit of tar. As for those who are talking about the stabilising force of SWFs, maybe it&#039;s a sense of hoping it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, hey, they did swallow the losses coming from Merill and MS amongst others.

btw, your site was so overwhlemed on tues morning (asia time, approx mon evening EST) - guess the vote was really shocking huh.

how&#039;s the latest vote going?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear, Brad, you&#8217;re spounding more and more Star Wars, not in terms of fantasy/sci-fi but the implied &#8220;moral battle&#8221; &#8211; c&#8217;mon, there&#8217;s hardly a skywalker vs the empire battle here, if anything, everyone has just that bit of tar. As for those who are talking about the stabilising force of SWFs, maybe it&#8217;s a sense of hoping it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, hey, they did swallow the losses coming from Merill and MS amongst others.</p>
<p>btw, your site was so overwhlemed on tues morning (asia time, approx mon evening EST) &#8211; guess the vote was really shocking huh.</p>
<p>how&#8217;s the latest vote going?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cedric Regula</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114215</link>
		<dc:creator>Cedric Regula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114215</guid>
		<description>LB:i might be wrong but i interpreted cedric’s ‘perfect’ economy to be more like a perfect storm rather than an utopian ideal, or maybe a combination of the two.

Tongue in cheek, of course, but over the last 30 years I think we had a huge amount of monetary inflation covering up a steady deflation of what was our real economy, and monetary authorities focused on the ideal inflation rate of 2% the whole time, which makes it all ok in their minds. 

The Information Age was the last push in the US to increase the productivity of pushing retail items and financial paper. Tho it is good for pushing knowledge around, just like the early nineties sci-fi novels predicted where sci-fi authors had global blogs communing on all the issues of the day.

Now we have the problem of high commodity prices. The final frontier.

So after going where no man wants to go,and using our investment instead, if we solve that one, we won&#039;t have work or money, just like on Star Trek.

Just a crazy thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LB:i might be wrong but i interpreted cedric’s ‘perfect’ economy to be more like a perfect storm rather than an utopian ideal, or maybe a combination of the two.</p>
<p>Tongue in cheek, of course, but over the last 30 years I think we had a huge amount of monetary inflation covering up a steady deflation of what was our real economy, and monetary authorities focused on the ideal inflation rate of 2% the whole time, which makes it all ok in their minds. </p>
<p>The Information Age was the last push in the US to increase the productivity of pushing retail items and financial paper. Tho it is good for pushing knowledge around, just like the early nineties sci-fi novels predicted where sci-fi authors had global blogs communing on all the issues of the day.</p>
<p>Now we have the problem of high commodity prices. The final frontier.</p>
<p>So after going where no man wants to go,and using our investment instead, if we solve that one, we won&#8217;t have work or money, just like on Star Trek.</p>
<p>Just a crazy thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114214</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 22:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/09/30/dark-flows/#comment-114214</guid>
		<description>2fish -- i might be wrong but i interpreted cedric&#039;s &#039;perfect&#039; economy to be more like a perfect storm rather than an utopian ideal, or maybe a combination of the two.

whatever one may think of him, Ron Paul had a brilliant line the other day:

what we are again learning from history is that we are again incapable of learning from history.

...or something like that...

your point well taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2fish &#8212; i might be wrong but i interpreted cedric&#8217;s &#8216;perfect&#8217; economy to be more like a perfect storm rather than an utopian ideal, or maybe a combination of the two.</p>
<p>whatever one may think of him, Ron Paul had a brilliant line the other day:</p>
<p>what we are again learning from history is that we are again incapable of learning from history.</p>
<p>&#8230;or something like that&#8230;</p>
<p>your point well taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
