<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The central bank flight to safety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: windows 7 test</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/#comment-134875</link>
		<dc:creator>windows 7 test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4256#comment-134875</guid>
		<description>hi julia here. i like this very much.....The USD remains stronger than one might think into the beginning of 2009. Between the latest Mid East tensions and general flight to safety it rallied again to 83 on the USDX when it looked like it might crack into the 70’s again, the low being 70ish last year, before the USD rallied after April of 08, which caught the commodity and metals complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi julia here. i like this very much&#8230;..The USD remains stronger than one might think into the beginning of 2009. Between the latest Mid East tensions and general flight to safety it rallied again to 83 on the USDX when it looked like it might crack into the 70’s again, the low being 70ish last year, before the USD rallied after April of 08, which caught the commodity and metals complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RebelEconomist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/#comment-121008</link>
		<dc:creator>RebelEconomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4256#comment-121008</guid>
		<description>I am no expert in the complex national politics of the EU, Judy, but my best guess would be that the present simmering debate will continue.  Sarkozy will no doubt badger the ECB to ease up and the Germans to loosen fiscally, but given the successful record of the Germans emerging from previous crises, it is a difficult argument to make.  The fact is that EMU was built on the Bundesbank and the French made sacrifices to live up to it.  I cannot see them throwing that away if the Germans will not budge.

Spain now also aspires to being more like the Germans.  Italy&#039;s government is a joke of course, but at least its private enterprises are good and its people save.

It is Britain that worries me.  I fear that our cynical, weak and vain prime minister and sybaritic population will be reluctant to face up to our problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am no expert in the complex national politics of the EU, Judy, but my best guess would be that the present simmering debate will continue.  Sarkozy will no doubt badger the ECB to ease up and the Germans to loosen fiscally, but given the successful record of the Germans emerging from previous crises, it is a difficult argument to make.  The fact is that EMU was built on the Bundesbank and the French made sacrifices to live up to it.  I cannot see them throwing that away if the Germans will not budge.</p>
<p>Spain now also aspires to being more like the Germans.  Italy&#8217;s government is a joke of course, but at least its private enterprises are good and its people save.</p>
<p>It is Britain that worries me.  I fear that our cynical, weak and vain prime minister and sybaritic population will be reluctant to face up to our problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Yeo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/#comment-121004</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Yeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4256#comment-121004</guid>
		<description>2fish

no doubt China can&#039;t &quot;switch&quot; to euros overnight, that however does not switch off the spe culation from observors and investors. how damaging that may be is anyone&#039;s guess. the question is if the slightest hint of a shift will set off a speculative stampede. 

rebeleconomist

was wondering if the eurozone could maintain its stability harmonious front/policy line for very long before open fractitious spats start, hmm am thinking german-french-spanish spat soon, what do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2fish</p>
<p>no doubt China can&#8217;t &#8220;switch&#8221; to euros overnight, that however does not switch off the spe culation from observors and investors. how damaging that may be is anyone&#8217;s guess. the question is if the slightest hint of a shift will set off a speculative stampede. </p>
<p>rebeleconomist</p>
<p>was wondering if the eurozone could maintain its stability harmonious front/policy line for very long before open fractitious spats start, hmm am thinking german-french-spanish spat soon, what do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RebelEconomist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/#comment-120950</link>
		<dc:creator>RebelEconomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4256#comment-120950</guid>
		<description>Twofish,

You do not even know the size of your own country&#039;s bond market.  As of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/mspd/2008/opdx112008.xls&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;November 30th 2008&lt;/a&gt;, there were $5.8tn treasuries outstanding.

I am sure that the European Commission would be gratified to know that someone considers the stability pact so binding, especially considering that even those famously disciplined Germans are currently in breach of it.

As I said, before you dispute what others write, check your own facts.  Don&#039;t waste peoples&#039; time.

In the meantime, have a Merry Christmas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twofish,</p>
<p>You do not even know the size of your own country&#8217;s bond market.  As of <a href="http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/mspd/2008/opdx112008.xls" rel="nofollow">November 30th 2008</a>, there were $5.8tn treasuries outstanding.</p>
<p>I am sure that the European Commission would be gratified to know that someone considers the stability pact so binding, especially considering that even those famously disciplined Germans are currently in breach of it.</p>
<p>As I said, before you dispute what others write, check your own facts.  Don&#8217;t waste peoples&#8217; time.</p>
<p>In the meantime, have a Merry Christmas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elephants in bathtubs - Euro Government Bonds, Treasuries, and GSE&#8217;s &#171; Twofish&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/#comment-120929</link>
		<dc:creator>Elephants in bathtubs - Euro Government Bonds, Treasuries, and GSE&#8217;s &#171; Twofish&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4256#comment-120929</guid>
		<description>[...] Elephants in bathtubs - Euro Government Bonds, Treasuries, and&#160;GSE&#8217;s Filed under: china, finance &#8212; twofish @ 2:52 am   http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Elephants in bathtubs &#8211; Euro Government Bonds, Treasuries, and&nbsp;GSE&#8217;s Filed under: china, finance &#8212; twofish @ 2:52 am   <a href="http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twofish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/#comment-120925</link>
		<dc:creator>Twofish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4256#comment-120925</guid>
		<description>Also for the system to break in really big way, China doesn&#039;t have to buy every single Euro-government bond out there, all it has to do is to buy enough so that the yield on those bond starts hitting zero.  Once you have Euro-government bonds with zero interest, you can no longer do monetary policy so at that point the only way you can control the economy is through fiscal policy.  If you have a system such as in Europe, where the fiscal policies are fixed, then it becomes impossible to do any sort of macro-economic policy at all.

Something similar is happening right now with the United States and the fact that no one is buying agencies anymore.  If everyone buys Treasuries, the US can&#039;t do monetary policy anymore, and so the only thing left is fiscal policy.

I&#039;m sure that there are ways of restructuring the system to deal with this issue, just as the US fiscal and monetary system is being massively restructured right now.  It seems inevitable to me that the Fed is going into the home mortgage business whether it wants to or not.

However, it will involve quite a bit of coordination, and the PBC can&#039;t say one day &quot;let&#039;s switch to Euros&quot; without a huge amount of disruption which I can&#039;t see them wanting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also for the system to break in really big way, China doesn&#8217;t have to buy every single Euro-government bond out there, all it has to do is to buy enough so that the yield on those bond starts hitting zero.  Once you have Euro-government bonds with zero interest, you can no longer do monetary policy so at that point the only way you can control the economy is through fiscal policy.  If you have a system such as in Europe, where the fiscal policies are fixed, then it becomes impossible to do any sort of macro-economic policy at all.</p>
<p>Something similar is happening right now with the United States and the fact that no one is buying agencies anymore.  If everyone buys Treasuries, the US can&#8217;t do monetary policy anymore, and so the only thing left is fiscal policy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that there are ways of restructuring the system to deal with this issue, just as the US fiscal and monetary system is being massively restructured right now.  It seems inevitable to me that the Fed is going into the home mortgage business whether it wants to or not.</p>
<p>However, it will involve quite a bit of coordination, and the PBC can&#8217;t say one day &#8220;let&#8217;s switch to Euros&#8221; without a huge amount of disruption which I can&#8217;t see them wanting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twofish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/#comment-120923</link>
		<dc:creator>Twofish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4256#comment-120923</guid>
		<description>Also, I question whether the US Treasury market is large enough by itself to absorb Chinese and Saudi reserve holdings without causing massive market disruption.  

Before July, agency bonds were acting as a proxy for Treasuries adding about $5 trillion to the volume of bonds available to hold reserves.  Once central banks stopped buying agencies and shifted to Treasuries, we&#039;ve had massive market disruption in the form of negative interest on T-bills and huge spreads on everything else.  It&#039;s like watching an elephant in a bathtub when the bathtub suddenly got smaller.

Given what&#039;s happened with the shift from agencies to treasuries, seeing more than a 20% shift in PBC holding from Treasuries to Euro-bonds seems to me impractical without a lot of market disruption, which is the last thing that anyone wants right now.

I strongly think that with Treasury rates negative and Obama talking about massive stimulus packages and trillion dollar deficits, that we&#039;ll end up in 2009 with the world economy more &quot;unbalanced&quot; than in 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I question whether the US Treasury market is large enough by itself to absorb Chinese and Saudi reserve holdings without causing massive market disruption.  </p>
<p>Before July, agency bonds were acting as a proxy for Treasuries adding about $5 trillion to the volume of bonds available to hold reserves.  Once central banks stopped buying agencies and shifted to Treasuries, we&#8217;ve had massive market disruption in the form of negative interest on T-bills and huge spreads on everything else.  It&#8217;s like watching an elephant in a bathtub when the bathtub suddenly got smaller.</p>
<p>Given what&#8217;s happened with the shift from agencies to treasuries, seeing more than a 20% shift in PBC holding from Treasuries to Euro-bonds seems to me impractical without a lot of market disruption, which is the last thing that anyone wants right now.</p>
<p>I strongly think that with Treasury rates negative and Obama talking about massive stimulus packages and trillion dollar deficits, that we&#8217;ll end up in 2009 with the world economy more &#8220;unbalanced&#8221; than in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twofish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/#comment-120922</link>
		<dc:creator>Twofish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4256#comment-120922</guid>
		<description>Rebel: The big four AAA euro governments alone account for about $3.6tn at the present exchange rate. 

Compared to $6.3 Tn for US Treasuries.  I stand by my point.  

Rebel: It is certainly easily large enough to support a shift in the composition of foreign exchange reserves.

Given the numbers above, I really don&#039;t think that this is the case.  

Rebel: In Europe, the stability pact is supposed to limit government debt, but the US has its own debt ceiling.

The US debt ceiling can be moved upward by an act of Congress whereas to renegotiate the stability pact requires a long and painful intergovernmental negotiation between the various governments with any major EU government (probably the Germans) saying no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebel: The big four AAA euro governments alone account for about $3.6tn at the present exchange rate. </p>
<p>Compared to $6.3 Tn for US Treasuries.  I stand by my point.  </p>
<p>Rebel: It is certainly easily large enough to support a shift in the composition of foreign exchange reserves.</p>
<p>Given the numbers above, I really don&#8217;t think that this is the case.  </p>
<p>Rebel: In Europe, the stability pact is supposed to limit government debt, but the US has its own debt ceiling.</p>
<p>The US debt ceiling can be moved upward by an act of Congress whereas to renegotiate the stability pact requires a long and painful intergovernmental negotiation between the various governments with any major EU government (probably the Germans) saying no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsetser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/#comment-120916</link>
		<dc:creator>bsetser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4256#comment-120916</guid>
		<description>observer -- see my next post.

2fish.   There are plenty of eurozone bonds that China could buy.  Whether it could buy more without driving yields down even more than it is already is a somewhat different question.  But there is no shortage of existing bonds, and with rising fiscal deficits in Europe, there shouldn&#039;t be a shortage of new supply either.

Especially if you are willing to buy government guaranteed bonds issued by european banks ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>observer &#8212; see my next post.</p>
<p>2fish.   There are plenty of eurozone bonds that China could buy.  Whether it could buy more without driving yields down even more than it is already is a somewhat different question.  But there is no shortage of existing bonds, and with rising fiscal deficits in Europe, there shouldn&#8217;t be a shortage of new supply either.</p>
<p>Especially if you are willing to buy government guaranteed bonds issued by european banks &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RebelEconomist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/12/21/the-central-bank-flight-to-safety/#comment-120911</link>
		<dc:creator>RebelEconomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4256#comment-120911</guid>
		<description>Twofish,

I notice that you don&#039;t state the size of the euro government bond market, probably because you don&#039;t know much about it.

The big four AAA euro governments alone account for about $3.6tn at the present exchange rate.  In addition, there are several smaller AAA euro sovereign issuers in Europe (Austria, Finland, Ireland etc, even including the UK).  At less than AAA, Italy and Belgium account for about $2.3tn.  Then there is Greece, if you dare!

The euro government bond market is actually bigger than the treasury market.  It is certainly easily large enough to support a shift in the composition of foreign exchange reserves.

In Europe, the stability pact is supposed to limit government debt, but the US has its own debt ceiling.

Before you dispute what other commenters write here Twofish, you owe it to them to make sure that you know the facts yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twofish,</p>
<p>I notice that you don&#8217;t state the size of the euro government bond market, probably because you don&#8217;t know much about it.</p>
<p>The big four AAA euro governments alone account for about $3.6tn at the present exchange rate.  In addition, there are several smaller AAA euro sovereign issuers in Europe (Austria, Finland, Ireland etc, even including the UK).  At less than AAA, Italy and Belgium account for about $2.3tn.  Then there is Greece, if you dare!</p>
<p>The euro government bond market is actually bigger than the treasury market.  It is certainly easily large enough to support a shift in the composition of foreign exchange reserves.</p>
<p>In Europe, the stability pact is supposed to limit government debt, but the US has its own debt ceiling.</p>
<p>Before you dispute what other commenters write here Twofish, you owe it to them to make sure that you know the facts yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

