<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The China Not-Investing Corporation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/01/05/the-china-not-investing-corporation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/01/05/the-china-not-investing-corporation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cristina</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/01/05/the-china-not-investing-corporation/#comment-135042</link>
		<dc:creator>cristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4376#comment-135042</guid>
		<description>hello
when i saw your blog it was very strange.
cristina
———-
&lt;a&gt;Investments Guide&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello<br />
when i saw your blog it was very strange.<br />
cristina<br />
———-<br />
<a>Investments Guide</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cristina</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/01/05/the-china-not-investing-corporation/#comment-135041</link>
		<dc:creator>cristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4376#comment-135041</guid>
		<description>hello
when i saw your blog it was very strange.
cristina
----------
&lt;a&gt;Investments Guide&lt;/a&gt; 
------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello<br />
when i saw your blog it was very strange.<br />
cristina<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<a>Investments Guide</a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China&#8217;s Route to Best Practices: It is not M&#38;A &#171; Silicon Hutong</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/01/05/the-china-not-investing-corporation/#comment-134944</link>
		<dc:creator>China&#8217;s Route to Best Practices: It is not M&#38;A &#171; Silicon Hutong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4376#comment-134944</guid>
		<description>[...] post on his blog at the Council on Foreign Relations website, Brad Setser takes a contrarian view on why local Chinese banks have been happy to take foreign investment, and why the government has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post on his blog at the Council on Foreign Relations website, Brad Setser takes a contrarian view on why local Chinese banks have been happy to take foreign investment, and why the government has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China&#8217;s Route to Best Practices: It&#8217;s Not M&#38;A &#124; Stocks and Dollars</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/01/05/the-china-not-investing-corporation/#comment-134851</link>
		<dc:creator>China&#8217;s Route to Best Practices: It&#8217;s Not M&#38;A &#124; Stocks and Dollars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4376#comment-134851</guid>
		<description>[...] post on his blog at the Council on Foreign Relations website, Brad Setser takes a contrarian view on why local Chinese banks have been happy to take foreign investment, and why the government has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post on his blog at the Council on Foreign Relations website, Brad Setser takes a contrarian view on why local Chinese banks have been happy to take foreign investment, and why the government has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China&#8217;s Route to Best Practices: It&#8217;s Not M&#38;A &#124; Top Equity News</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/01/05/the-china-not-investing-corporation/#comment-134850</link>
		<dc:creator>China&#8217;s Route to Best Practices: It&#8217;s Not M&#38;A &#124; Top Equity News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4376#comment-134850</guid>
		<description>[...] post on his blog at the Council on Foreign Relations website, Brad Setser takes a contrarian view on why local Chinese banks have been happy to take foreign investment, and why the government has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post on his blog at the Council on Foreign Relations website, Brad Setser takes a contrarian view on why local Chinese banks have been happy to take foreign investment, and why the government has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China&#8217;s Route to Best Practices: It&#8217;s Not M&#38;A &#124; Reaction Radio</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/01/05/the-china-not-investing-corporation/#comment-134849</link>
		<dc:creator>China&#8217;s Route to Best Practices: It&#8217;s Not M&#38;A &#124; Reaction Radio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4376#comment-134849</guid>
		<description>[...] post on his blog at the Council on Foreign Relations website, Brad Setser takes a contrarian view on why local Chinese banks have been happy to take foreign investment, and why the government has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post on his blog at the Council on Foreign Relations website, Brad Setser takes a contrarian view on why local Chinese banks have been happy to take foreign investment, and why the government has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Setser: Follow the Money &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Secrets from the Treasury&#8217;s Survey: It looks like China bought a lot of equities just before the stock market tumbled</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/01/05/the-china-not-investing-corporation/#comment-126371</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Setser: Follow the Money &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Secrets from the Treasury&#8217;s Survey: It looks like China bought a lot of equities just before the stock market tumbled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4376#comment-126371</guid>
		<description>[...] $70 billion. And the CIC is now bragging that its external portfolio was mostly in cash – as it didn’t invest most of the $90 billion or so of foreign exchange that it bought off SAFE (I am setting aside the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $70 billion. And the CIC is now bragging that its external portfolio was mostly in cash – as it didn’t invest most of the $90 billion or so of foreign exchange that it bought off SAFE (I am setting aside the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twofish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/01/05/the-china-not-investing-corporation/#comment-121708</link>
		<dc:creator>Twofish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4376#comment-121708</guid>
		<description>bsetser: Bank of America last month cancelled a plan to sell more than $3bn worth of its shares in CCB after being told by senior government and banking officials that Beijing was unhappy with the timing of the sale, according to people familiar with the matter.

FYI, the sale just went through.  Bank of America made about a $1 billion on the sale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bsetser: Bank of America last month cancelled a plan to sell more than $3bn worth of its shares in CCB after being told by senior government and banking officials that Beijing was unhappy with the timing of the sale, according to people familiar with the matter.</p>
<p>FYI, the sale just went through.  Bank of America made about a $1 billion on the sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/01/05/the-china-not-investing-corporation/#comment-121694</link>
		<dc:creator>Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4376#comment-121694</guid>
		<description>Twofish: I suspect that we are about to find some very expansive and creative definitions of “national security.”

That&#039;s true. However, I think we are about to find that the business of America is business, and cash is king. Even politicians would be hard pressed to find reasons for keeping autoworkers out of a job when someone is willing to rescue them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twofish: I suspect that we are about to find some very expansive and creative definitions of “national security.”</p>
<p>That&#8217;s true. However, I think we are about to find that the business of America is business, and cash is king. Even politicians would be hard pressed to find reasons for keeping autoworkers out of a job when someone is willing to rescue them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adiemuso</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/01/05/the-china-not-investing-corporation/#comment-121691</link>
		<dc:creator>adiemuso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=4376#comment-121691</guid>
		<description>Geert,
good to find someone here who puts his $ down.

i agree with you on having independent trading/investment actions/ideas from economic articles/reviews/comments/ideals. 

in my opinion, though seemingly, the real world operates differently from its theoretical counterpart, however the academic/theoretical model forms a basis for a trader/investor to consider his/her strategies for the long/medium/short term.

i have never agreed with anyone who prides his/herself with their profits through short term/ intraday bets entirely devoid of any economics/politics/real worl analysis. I think anyone can do that, and a winning streak or profits are just pure luck. a seasoned gambler at Las Vegas can be equally good too. No disrespect to anyone.

back to the contents of this blog, i do think that there are avenues for the USD assets being held by the Chinese to be used without being self suicidal. Brad has pointed out a few, logically i think thats very likely too.

Money flows are one of the important factors for Traders/Investors. Especially one of this magnitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geert,<br />
good to find someone here who puts his $ down.</p>
<p>i agree with you on having independent trading/investment actions/ideas from economic articles/reviews/comments/ideals. </p>
<p>in my opinion, though seemingly, the real world operates differently from its theoretical counterpart, however the academic/theoretical model forms a basis for a trader/investor to consider his/her strategies for the long/medium/short term.</p>
<p>i have never agreed with anyone who prides his/herself with their profits through short term/ intraday bets entirely devoid of any economics/politics/real worl analysis. I think anyone can do that, and a winning streak or profits are just pure luck. a seasoned gambler at Las Vegas can be equally good too. No disrespect to anyone.</p>
<p>back to the contents of this blog, i do think that there are avenues for the USD assets being held by the Chinese to be used without being self suicidal. Brad has pointed out a few, logically i think thats very likely too.</p>
<p>Money flows are one of the important factors for Traders/Investors. Especially one of this magnitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

