<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China&#8217;s call for a new international financial system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/03/24/chinas-call-for-a-new-international-financial-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/03/24/chinas-call-for-a-new-international-financial-system/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Der Weg Zur Weltregierung: Versklavung durch IWF Weltwährung und CO² Steuer an die UNO &#171; Der Honigmann sagt&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/03/24/chinas-call-for-a-new-international-financial-system/#comment-135196</link>
		<dc:creator>Der Weg Zur Weltregierung: Versklavung durch IWF Weltwährung und CO² Steuer an die UNO &#171; Der Honigmann sagt&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 08:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5033#comment-135196</guid>
		<description>[...] CFR unterstützt die IMF-Lösung  vorsichtig. Im Jahr 2007, schlug das CFR-Mitglied Alan Greenspan  vor, dass der Euro die Rolle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CFR unterstützt die IMF-Lösung  vorsichtig. Im Jahr 2007, schlug das CFR-Mitglied Alan Greenspan  vor, dass der Euro die Rolle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Peoples</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/03/24/chinas-call-for-a-new-international-financial-system/#comment-135172</link>
		<dc:creator>The Peoples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 05:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5033#comment-135172</guid>
		<description>Bangladesh is known as democratic country   
But as per article (section) 70 of Bangladesh   Constitution, only key person or party chief. can take decision none the else    

Second one is very age old or left over colonial laws and legal  system for ruling the people.
Due to which Billions of  hard earned  money of common people are spent  in  conducting  huge number suit like as  37.00  Lac  ( Thirty  Seven  Lac ) till   may, 2019. in  the court which may not be settled even in life time nor have any certainty of any  relief .   
 
NOW THE QUESTION WHO ARE DIRECT  BENEFICIERIES   ?
 
Contesting parties are compelled to spend billions of Dollar  in addition to valuable times of their active life, year after year  although more then 35  % people are living below  the poverty line...    

ARE THESE   PRODUCTIVE ACTIVITIES ?  

Why these  colonial laws and legal system are   not changed  ?

Experienced Peoples are in opinion that Bangladesh can not face the track of  advancement of science and technology like other Asian Countries nearby Bangladesh 
Even Bangladesh will not be able to dream the face of digital world with existing colonial laws and legal system. 

The experienced  persons are in opinion that the present legal systems  and procedures   have no   rule  in  productive activities to  change the fate of people    or the poverty of the country rather helping the rent seeking  or interest  seeking  process from  the grass root level   .  

Third point which is most significant and important are  the  lack of accountability in every stage of life for   people or Government Personal /  Officials which will encourage  the  growth of  terrorism .   

Now it  has became  imperative to reform / replace the concerned  ministry  &amp; commission / body consisting of  expert of  political sciences / social welfares , expert  of relevant subjects of science and technology. like  medicine, engineering, agricultural sciences , information technology , telecommunications  sciences   , business and commerce etc   ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bangladesh is known as democratic country<br />
But as per article (section) 70 of Bangladesh   Constitution, only key person or party chief. can take decision none the else    </p>
<p>Second one is very age old or left over colonial laws and legal  system for ruling the people.<br />
Due to which Billions of  hard earned  money of common people are spent  in  conducting  huge number suit like as  37.00  Lac  ( Thirty  Seven  Lac ) till   may, 2019. in  the court which may not be settled even in life time nor have any certainty of any  relief .   </p>
<p>NOW THE QUESTION WHO ARE DIRECT  BENEFICIERIES   ?</p>
<p>Contesting parties are compelled to spend billions of Dollar  in addition to valuable times of their active life, year after year  although more then 35  % people are living below  the poverty line&#8230;    </p>
<p>ARE THESE   PRODUCTIVE ACTIVITIES ?  </p>
<p>Why these  colonial laws and legal system are   not changed  ?</p>
<p>Experienced Peoples are in opinion that Bangladesh can not face the track of  advancement of science and technology like other Asian Countries nearby Bangladesh<br />
Even Bangladesh will not be able to dream the face of digital world with existing colonial laws and legal system. </p>
<p>The experienced  persons are in opinion that the present legal systems  and procedures   have no   rule  in  productive activities to  change the fate of people    or the poverty of the country rather helping the rent seeking  or interest  seeking  process from  the grass root level   .  </p>
<p>Third point which is most significant and important are  the  lack of accountability in every stage of life for   people or Government Personal /  Officials which will encourage  the  growth of  terrorism .   </p>
<p>Now it  has became  imperative to reform / replace the concerned  ministry  &amp; commission / body consisting of  expert of  political sciences / social welfares , expert  of relevant subjects of science and technology. like  medicine, engineering, agricultural sciences , information technology , telecommunications  sciences   , business and commerce etc   ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Der Weg Zur Weltregierung: Versklavung Durch IWF Weltwährung Und Welt CO2 Steuer An Die UNO &#187; Euro-med</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/03/24/chinas-call-for-a-new-international-financial-system/#comment-128552</link>
		<dc:creator>Der Weg Zur Weltregierung: Versklavung Durch IWF Weltwährung Und Welt CO2 Steuer An Die UNO &#187; Euro-med</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5033#comment-128552</guid>
		<description>[...] CFR&#160;unterst&#252;tzt die IMF-L&#246;sung&#160;&#160;vorsichtig. Im Jahr 2007,&#160;schlug das&#160;CFR-Mitglied Alan Greenspan&#160;&#160;vor, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CFR&nbsp;unterst&uuml;tzt die IMF-L&ouml;sung&nbsp;&nbsp;vorsichtig. Im Jahr 2007,&nbsp;schlug das&nbsp;CFR-Mitglied Alan Greenspan&nbsp;&nbsp;vor, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Way to World Government: Enslavement through IMF World Currency and World CO2 Tax to the UN &#187; Euro-med</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/03/24/chinas-call-for-a-new-international-financial-system/#comment-128550</link>
		<dc:creator>The Way to World Government: Enslavement through IMF World Currency and World CO2 Tax to the UN &#187; Euro-med</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5033#comment-128550</guid>
		<description>[...] The CFR supports the IMF solution cautuiously . In 2007, CFT Alan Greenspan &#160;suggested the euro to take the role of international reserve valuta instead of the dollar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The CFR supports the IMF solution cautuiously . In 2007, CFT Alan Greenspan &nbsp;suggested the euro to take the role of international reserve valuta instead of the dollar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vejen Til Verdensregering: Slaver Gennem Verdensvaluta Og CO2-Skat Til FN &#187; Euro-med</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/03/24/chinas-call-for-a-new-international-financial-system/#comment-128549</link>
		<dc:creator>Vejen Til Verdensregering: Slaver Gennem Verdensvaluta Og CO2-Skat Til FN &#187; Euro-med</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5033#comment-128549</guid>
		<description>[...] som&#160;man vil. Nogle ser dem og efterh&#229;nden dollaren med p&#229; denne m&#229;de.  CFR st&#248;tter IMF l&#248;sningen forsigtigt. I 2007 foreslog CFR-medlem Alan Greenspan&#160;,&#160;at euroen skulle overtage rollen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] som&nbsp;man vil. Nogle ser dem og efterh&aring;nden dollaren med p&aring; denne m&aring;de.  CFR st&oslash;tter IMF l&oslash;sningen forsigtigt. I 2007 foreslog CFR-medlem Alan Greenspan&nbsp;,&nbsp;at euroen skulle overtage rollen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Yeo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/03/24/chinas-call-for-a-new-international-financial-system/#comment-128317</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Yeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5033#comment-128317</guid>
		<description>Brad

wouldn&#039;t a &quot;smaller stockpile of reserves&quot; on the part of the Chinese be an obstacle in their investing in US assets, particularly treasuries which in part funds rescue initiatives?


What doesn&#039;t go in Chinese pockets doesn&#039;t necessarily line the pockets of its rivals?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad</p>
<p>wouldn&#8217;t a &#8220;smaller stockpile of reserves&#8221; on the part of the Chinese be an obstacle in their investing in US assets, particularly treasuries which in part funds rescue initiatives?</p>
<p>What doesn&#8217;t go in Chinese pockets doesn&#8217;t necessarily line the pockets of its rivals?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gold Standard &#187; Proposals for a new global reserve currency</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/03/24/chinas-call-for-a-new-international-financial-system/#comment-128310</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gold Standard &#187; Proposals for a new global reserve currency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5033#comment-128310</guid>
		<description>[...] proposal as did Mr. Gordon Brown. &#8216;Economist&#8217; struck a cautious tone while Brad Setser sounded [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] proposal as did Mr. Gordon Brown. &#8216;Economist&#8217; struck a cautious tone while Brad Setser sounded [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New global reserve currency&#8211;Really? &#171; Rudi von Arnim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/03/24/chinas-call-for-a-new-international-financial-system/#comment-128297</link>
		<dc:creator>New global reserve currency&#8211;Really? &#171; Rudi von Arnim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5033#comment-128297</guid>
		<description>[...] What are the chances of anything coming of it? Very little, I suppose. The US will fight tooth and nail to maintain its center country position, and while China is talking about a new reserve currency, it continues to amass dollars. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What are the chances of anything coming of it? Very little, I suppose. The US will fight tooth and nail to maintain its center country position, and while China is talking about a new reserve currency, it continues to amass dollars. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Controlling the Agenda as Cenbank Holdings Flatline &#124; Housing Doom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/03/24/chinas-call-for-a-new-international-financial-system/#comment-128261</link>
		<dc:creator>China Controlling the Agenda as Cenbank Holdings Flatline &#124; Housing Doom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5033#comment-128261</guid>
		<description>[...] and Japan&#8217;s central banks would be maintaining their Treasury Debt holdings.[1] Setser has a long analysis [2] and HuffyPo is seeing an &quot;Anti-Dollar Contagion&quot; [3] taking shape. There&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Japan&#8217;s central banks would be maintaining their Treasury Debt holdings.[1] Setser has a long analysis [2] and HuffyPo is seeing an &quot;Anti-Dollar Contagion&quot; [3] taking shape. There&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WStroupe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/03/24/chinas-call-for-a-new-international-financial-system/#comment-128248</link>
		<dc:creator>WStroupe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5033#comment-128248</guid>
		<description>UN Panel pushes super-reserve currency (SRC) to replace the dollar, and says Stiglitz (panel’s head) it “is feasible, non-inflationary and could be easily implemented, including in ways which mitigate the difficulties caused by asymmetric adjustment between surplus and deficit countries.”

Here’s the link to the story on the UN panel pushing for a new global reserve currency:

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.18e9e5692442aa61d7510553b5ffc14e.8b1&amp;show_article=1

One way to look at the recent statements of Russian, Chinese and UN leaders touting the SRC is that they are all jockeying for position and bidding for stronger, lead roles in the upcoming G20 summit on April 2. And well that may be. But there’s much more to this in my opinion.

Due specifically to this global crisis, the U.S. financial system, the dollar, the US’ favored ideologies, and the negotiating position itself of the U.S. have all been severely undermined, in the view of the bulk of the rest of the world. Fact is, the U.S. doesn’t rule the policy roost anymore, though it still talks tough and makes threats. But it can’t deliver on those threats. Witness the recent U.S. bailout of China on its Treasuries holdings, discussed here in another thread.

In the run-up to the G20 summit, powers like BRIC and the UN are encircling the U.S., intent on capitalizing on the current crisis. They may not get all they want, as quickly as they want it, but they’re driving down toward the hoop and signaling to the U.S. that negotiations will be very tough going for the U.S. side.

It doesn’t matter whether or not the U.S. side realizes how weakened its position has become. What matters is that the rest of the world knows it, and intends to ‘work it’ to their strategic AND tactical advantage with respect to reforming the current global financial and monetary orders. Some powers are signaling they don’t want a nasty public fight (like Brazil), but that they nonetheless (quietly) support the move away from sole international reliance upon the dollar.

Conditions are ripe for some really substantive international reforms, much quicker than most people realize. However, I would be surprised if the G20 summit itself results in a truly dramatic, public announcement of such. I think most of the real reform will be taking place less ostentatiously, but I think the G20 summit’s big accomplishment may be to help gel the thinking, strategies, determination and urgency of the participants who favor a new SRC. If, as I suspect, the G20 does result in producing a united front against the old dollar-centric order, then things can happen quite fast after that.

The U.S. side and the dollar are at significant risk here. No longer is this a case of the ‘colossal giant’ (U.S.) being challenged by pitiful ‘little people’. The colossal giant is greatly weakened by this crisis, and the little people aren’t so little anymore by comparison. If there’s a united front, then the playing field is being leveled, or even tilted in favor of the emerging powers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UN Panel pushes super-reserve currency (SRC) to replace the dollar, and says Stiglitz (panel’s head) it “is feasible, non-inflationary and could be easily implemented, including in ways which mitigate the difficulties caused by asymmetric adjustment between surplus and deficit countries.”</p>
<p>Here’s the link to the story on the UN panel pushing for a new global reserve currency:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.18e9e5692442aa61d7510553b5ffc14e.8b1&#038;show_article=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.18e9e5692442aa61d7510553b5ffc14e.8b1&#038;show_article=1</a></p>
<p>One way to look at the recent statements of Russian, Chinese and UN leaders touting the SRC is that they are all jockeying for position and bidding for stronger, lead roles in the upcoming G20 summit on April 2. And well that may be. But there’s much more to this in my opinion.</p>
<p>Due specifically to this global crisis, the U.S. financial system, the dollar, the US’ favored ideologies, and the negotiating position itself of the U.S. have all been severely undermined, in the view of the bulk of the rest of the world. Fact is, the U.S. doesn’t rule the policy roost anymore, though it still talks tough and makes threats. But it can’t deliver on those threats. Witness the recent U.S. bailout of China on its Treasuries holdings, discussed here in another thread.</p>
<p>In the run-up to the G20 summit, powers like BRIC and the UN are encircling the U.S., intent on capitalizing on the current crisis. They may not get all they want, as quickly as they want it, but they’re driving down toward the hoop and signaling to the U.S. that negotiations will be very tough going for the U.S. side.</p>
<p>It doesn’t matter whether or not the U.S. side realizes how weakened its position has become. What matters is that the rest of the world knows it, and intends to ‘work it’ to their strategic AND tactical advantage with respect to reforming the current global financial and monetary orders. Some powers are signaling they don’t want a nasty public fight (like Brazil), but that they nonetheless (quietly) support the move away from sole international reliance upon the dollar.</p>
<p>Conditions are ripe for some really substantive international reforms, much quicker than most people realize. However, I would be surprised if the G20 summit itself results in a truly dramatic, public announcement of such. I think most of the real reform will be taking place less ostentatiously, but I think the G20 summit’s big accomplishment may be to help gel the thinking, strategies, determination and urgency of the participants who favor a new SRC. If, as I suspect, the G20 does result in producing a united front against the old dollar-centric order, then things can happen quite fast after that.</p>
<p>The U.S. side and the dollar are at significant risk here. No longer is this a case of the ‘colossal giant’ (U.S.) being challenged by pitiful ‘little people’. The colossal giant is greatly weakened by this crisis, and the little people aren’t so little anymore by comparison. If there’s a united front, then the playing field is being leveled, or even tilted in favor of the emerging powers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

