In early January, data showing a sharp fall in Asian exports — a couple of Asian countries, led by Korea, tend to report trade data faster than anyone else — signaled a much broader slump in global trade.
The trade data for q1 is now in for most of the world, and it is (predictably) grim. China’s exports were up close to 20% y/y in q3 2008. They were down 20% y/y in q1 2008. Japan’s exports are now, stunningly, down close to 50% y/y. Germany isn’t doing much better. In February — the last monthly data point — exports were down by 23%, but in April German auto exports were down 48%. Turkey’s exports are down 33%.
Trade contracted exceptionally sharply almost everywhere. A sudden deceleration global demand growth — probably augmented by an inventory correction and in some case a shortfall of trade finance — is undoubtedly the main reason for the very sudden fall in global trade.
On the other hand, there is now some evidence that the contraction has ended, at least in Asia. Korea’s April exports, for example, topped its March exports. A chart showing Korea’s monthly exports and imports isn’t as scary now as it was a few months ago.
Korea’s April 2009 exports are about equal to its April 2007 exports. The y/y fall in Korea’s exports is now similar to the fall in 2001 — when the tech bust hit Korea hard. That counts as good news these days, as for a while it looked like the current fall would be far larger.
And if Chinese manufacturing is truly now poised to expand again on the back of China’s stimulus — as China’s PMI data (perhaps) suggests — Chinese imports should start to grow again, supporting global demand.
Three important caveats though are in order:
1) The Korean won has depreciated quite significantly over the past year. It started to slide a year ago. That had helped to limit the fall in Korea’s exports. Korea is clearly increasing its share of a shrinking market. The fall in Japan’s exports in March was much larger than the fall in Korea’s exports in March.
2) US demand for Korean autos (Hyundais in particular) have fallen by much less than the fall in total US demand for cars. See FT Alphaville’s useful chart. That is one big reason why Korean exports have held up better than Japanese — and for that matter German — exports. This no reflects at least in part the effect of the won’s weakness. It is a lot easier to offer to cover the payments of a person who loses their job if the won is at 1400 — or 1200 — than if the won is at 900.
3) Korea’s imports are still in the doldrums. That reflects, above all else, the huge fall in commodity prices, and thus the huge fall in Korea’s commodity import bill. But it would still be nice to see imports start to bounce off their monthly lows, as the fall in commodity prices is already reflected in the recent monthly data.
The last point applies throughout Asia. Last week the Wall Street Journal ran a story highlighting how the benefits of China’s stimulus were trickling out to the world — and to the US. Caterpillar in particular seems to be a big beneficiary, and GM also has been helped by the big jump in Chinese auto sales. Areddy and Aeffel wrote:
China’s efforts to quickly pump up its economy are providing a much-needed boost for U.S. businesses as well … A growing number of companies, from tire and excavator makers to fast-food chains, are benefiting from China’s $585 billion stimulus program
Fair enough. But the article lacked one key bit of context. The last available US data (for January and February combined) indicates that US exports to China are down 24% y/y. The US data is a bit dated by now, as there are signs that China’s economy picked up in March, April and May (after what I think was an exceptionally sharp deceleration in the fourth quarter). But until there is evidence that China is importing more not less — and evidence that China’s trade surplus is falling — it is pretty hard to argue that China is supporting global demand. The data showing the y/y change in US exports to China – which admittedly only runs through February –isn’t exactly encouraging.
Anecdotes are best when they tell a story that is grounded in the actual trade data. Reporting on turning points is hard. But it is important to note that China’s stimulus has yet to really register in either its import data — or in data showing the world’s exports to China.
Let’s hope that China’s trade data from the second quarter ends up telling a different story than the data from the first quarter.



It would be great if China’s rebound does indeed carry the region out of its export slump but I believe the stimulus will benefit commodity-exporting countries much more than high value-added exporters, like Taiwan and Korea. Is there anyway those countries will rebound in the absence of restored demand in the G3?
I thought that China’s car subsidies were a one time event and will not be repeated. All the infrastructure projects should help Caterpillar and they have been quite vocal in their opposition to the Geithner remarks against Chinese currency manipulation.
find it hard to believe they object to the treasury’s decision not to name china a manipulator …
also note that manufactures who produce in china for the world tend not to want to see china named a manipulator, and manufactures who sell to china’s government (boeing, etc) cannot publicly criticize china w/o risking the loss of business.
lodger — yes, they could rebound on the back of internal demand and some rise in demand from china. korea sells a lot of cars in the emerging world for example …
It would interesting if western corporations invested in a 6 month program studying Chinese Consumer behavior and drivers to turn them into super spenders!
Maybe we need to brand a Chinese “Paris Hilton” who makes materials “look cool” and thus captivates the young Chinese audience into a mindset where one item is “never enough”:)
remember, the best way to drive consumption is through branding…and sex sells regardless of ethnicity!
Not sure if GM China imports a meaningful number of car parts from the US: Apparently, their April sales were up 50 % yoy.
Quote Brad: “Germany isn’t doing much better. In February exports were down by 23%, but in April German auto exports were down 48%”
The steep fall in April auto exports actually isn’t much of a deterioration: Jan/Feb auto exports were already down 44 % yoy according to official Destatis figures.
Whilst China domestic needs coupled with its reserves may enjoy a sustainable momemtum.
I have reservation on the same for the rest of Asia.
My comments are driven from experience having professionaly lived in Asia two cycles of global recession.
The Asian intra trade is export driven and the export dependency to the US economy high.
The IMF is less sanguine for Vietnam as well
tyaresun: I thought that China’s car subsidies were a one time event and will not be repeated.
There are some major tax rebates, one of the big beneficenaries of those rebates is GM. China is probably the only place in the world that GM is in good shape.
bsetser: also note that manufactures who produce in china for the world tend not to want to see china named a manipulator, and manufactures who sell to china’s government (boeing, etc) cannot publicly criticize china w/o risking the loss of business.
Which will lead to some simply fascinating situations now that the US government is de facto owner of many of these companies (General Motors, Citigroup, BoA, and AIG).
It does make things interesting because it makes it more unclear what people’s financial interests are. For example, in 1985, if Japan put in tariffs measures against car parts, auto makers and unions would scream because this is clearly bad for auto makers, who would start screaming.
Today, it’s not clear. For example, China puts in tax rebates for autos. It turns out that GM has a joint venture with Chinese auto makers who benefit from those rebates. It’s not even clear that protectionism is bad, because if GM can manufacture cars in China and keep Korean and Japanese autos out, this makes things easier for them.
Part of the reason that GM is doing so well in China is that Chinese have lower standards for what constitutes a good car, since its local competitors are worse.
It’s not even clear that the UAW will scream if US auto jobs go overseas. Yes, this might shut down auto plants in the US, but the UAW has negotiated buyout and early retirement provisions with GM, and they need GM to make money or else all of those guarantees disappear. If GM is able to move factories to China and thereby make a profit so that they can continue to pay pensions and buyouts for workers, then the UAW may not say no.
Twofish
It is not General Motors, Citigroup, BoA, and AIG that would so much complain but Nike, Apple, and other makers of consumer goods.
Chinese exports could swing to the upside for Q2 as U.S. consumers April sentiment data looks “optimistic”, and the Green shoots hype may funnel through May….
Now thoughts on cars? Well the world should drive tata and/or smart cars. maybe then we wouldn’t have $100 oil in 6 months.
if China’s auto capacity continues to increase we better hope that we hit the electric car mania asap. Imagine the world with 500M SUV’s cruising the roads in China…….LOVELY!
Also, anyone have thoughts on leaked stress tests?
It sucks not being on the inside, i truly wish the game was played fair. The people that got the “leaks” early could obviously make $$$ today/yesterday. It’s unfortunate that the administration allowed leaks.
Why even have a stress test if people can’t maintain confidentiality?
I think it’s bigger deal leaking stress tests than Friedman buying Goldman.
If someone posited a year ago that China would be leading the world out of recession through its imports, even though its trade surplus is still rising or stable, it would be seen as completely absurd. But after six weeks of “green shoots”, it makes perfect sense.
Are these the green shoots we smoked in college?
The guarded optimism that evolved into a tenuous euphoria seems to have turned into untethered delirium…
We won’t see Malaysian trade data for March until later today, and the Philippines is always a whole lot later than anyone else. Still, best estimates and trends to data:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Exports_ _ _ Imports
(Year-on-year, US dollar terms)
China _ _ _ _ _ _—19.7%_ _—30.7%
Japan _ _ _ _ _ _—40.5% _ _—28.9%
Korea _ _ _ _ _ _—25.0% _ _—32.5%
Taiwan _ _ _ _ _—36.7%_ _ —41.7%
HK + S’pore _ _ —27.1% _ _ —27.1%
ASEAN 4 _ _ _ _—27.6% _ _—35.9%
=Sum= _ _ _ _ _ —27.6%_ _—31.2%
Two-way trade in Japan, Korea, Taiwan deteriorated in March; HK-Singapore, China and the ASEAN-4 saw only very marginal improvements.
Korean imports collapsed 30-31% in January and February (YoY), then hit their stride in the next two months, falling 35.5% in March and 35.3% in April.
China’s import prices, as far as I can tell, are dropping sharply, and most particularly for what is purchased from South-east Asia (raw materials and components).
When phrases like “record ugly” and “no one gets out alive” spring to mind, I get this image of rampaging bulls trampling all those tiny green shoots.
This isn’t over, by a long shot.
= = = = =
FollowTheMoney: Western MNCs have been studying Chinese consumer behavior for decades, and it turns out the Chinese consumer isn’t all that impressed with Western brands. As for using Western notions of sexual content in advertising, it ain’t gonna happen any time soon.
Thomas: GM China sources largely domestic components in China.
Top 10 2008 auto sales in China
FAW-Volkswagen
Shanghai Volkswagen
Shanghai General Motors
FAW Toyota
Chery Automobile
Dongfeng Nissan
GAC Honda
Beijing Hyundai
Geely
Changan Ford
= = = = =
As for Renminbi revaluation, it is the American consumer who will be screaming, not companies.
China’s exports were up close to 20% y/y in q3 2008. They were down 20% y/y in q1 2008.” You mean 2009.
FollowTheMoney: Re: stressed about leaks
It’s not clear if being first to get stress test leaks would have improved your trade suceess. CNBC computed the scorecard end of day and banks with “bad news” (meaning, to my thinking, they need more capital) averaged a 19% gain today. Banks with adequate capital posted zero to a few percent gains.
Glad I didn’t try playing this one.
I agree we have green shoot mania, and I liked Buiter’s recent comment that green shoot people are full of shoot.
Roubini calls them second deriviatives, a slowing of the decline.
I think it’s an inventory bounce.
Hard to find much evidence that people are shipping much stuff around. The Baltic Dry Index of shipping prices shows an anemic bounce in pricing. The Port of Long Beach container count is still down 25% from last March.
http://investmenttools.com/futures/bdi_baltic_dry_index.htm
This blog only accepts one link per post, so Port of LB is in a follow up post.
Port of LB stats:
http://www.polb.com/economics/stats/latest_teus.asp
i’d love to hear Setsers thoughts on the stress test results tomorrow…
Why Geithner and the Obama admin even bother holding a press conference when their friends leaked the numbers is beyond me.
What ever happened to signing “Confidentiality Agreements”???
According to the State Grid’s latest statistics, April’s national power generation totaled 274.763 billion kwh, a fall of 3.55%, year on year, and a decline of over 3% from the previous month.
Today’s Biz China: Estimation showed seaborne container throughput at main ports in China would be 9.2 million containers, presenting a 13.4 percent drop from a year earlier.
FollowTheMoney: The people that got the “leaks” early could obviously make $$$ today/yesterday. It’s unfortunate that the administration allowed leaks.
Allowed? The Obama administration practically ordered those leaks. When you have a story like this appear in every major newspaper at the same time, what happened was that the Treasury department called all of the major newspapers for an “off the record” conference.
The press conference is the movie premiere. The “pseudo-leaks” are the coming attractions.
Bob_in_MA: The guarded optimism that evolved into a tenuous euphoria seems to have turned into untethered delirium.
It’s an expectations thing. Everyone was so convinced that the world was going to end, that the fact that the Dow is down 40% from its high and we are going to be in the worst recession since the 1930′s has people dancing in the streets.
That is also why the bank stocks behaved the way that they did. People were so worried about Citigroup and BoA that when the news is “it’s as bad as we feared, they need tens of billions of dollars in capital” that caused people to go on a buying spree. Whereas the banks that are in good shape, everyone knew that they were in good shape. So what?
DOR: Western MNCs have been studying Chinese consumer behavior for decades, and it turns out the Chinese consumer isn’t all that impressed with Western brands.
The big problem with the Chinese consumer market is that there is no one Chinese consumer market. There are about thirty or forty markets and hundreds of different demographics. In the US, you can roll out something like the I-phone or I-Pod with a slick multi-billion dollar ad campaign. People in Portland, Kansas City, and Miami basically see the same ad and respond in the same way.
In China, things are too fragmented to do anything like that.
DOR: As for using Western notions of sexual content in advertising, it ain’t gonna happen any time soon.
And any Western music, media, or ad company that tries to get into the China market is going to find themselves fighting Hong Kong, Taiwanese, and to some extent South Korean companies that are already there.
DOR: “As for using Western notions of sexual content in advertising, it ain’t gonna happen any time soon.”
Ditto. In Thailand they wouldn’t even notice!
Cedric
My guess is also an inventory bounce.
China leads the dance. One of the reasons is that when you produce in China, you need to incorporate the time lag (about 8 weeks before you receive the goods in Europe). Orders have to be placed in advance.
We see a tepid increase in dry bulk transport (still meaningful because of the oversupply) and still a drop in container transport. Purchase of commodities and transportation are the first steps. Containertransport comes mainly after production.
When production starts electricity demand needs to increase. It dropped in the Q1 but March is more relevant.
http://en.in-en.com/article/News/Electricity/html/2009041511278.html
“One of the country’s top power producers, China resources Power Holdings Co, said yesterday that electricity sales climbed 13 percent to 5.7 million megawatt-hours last month from a year earlier.”
The reduction of inventories by the industry and the wholesale must have been very sharp and imo caused the exponential drop in export figures.
Inventories were too high at the start (combined with very specific circumstances like for the truck industry In Europe) and business anticipated quickly as growth stalled, stimulated by strained liquidity and falling commodity prices (trying to avoid losses on inventories).
Confronting two similar situation, adding the derivatives,a much widespread assets stress, could provide for an acid test to the stress test.
http://wapedia.mobi/en/Savings_and_Loan_crisis
The savings and loan crisis of the 1980s and 1990s (commonly referred to as the S&L crisis) was the failure of 745 savings and loan associations (S&Ls aka thrifts). An S&L association is a financial institution in the United States that accepts savings deposits and makes mortgage loans. The ultimate cost of the crisis is estimated to have totaled around $160.1 billion,deficits of the early 1990
2007 2009
95 banks and assimilated under the FDIC umbrella are deemed to have failed.
The US government has alredy pledged 700 billion USD.
Twofish,
You’re right about multiple Chinese consumer markets. Different 1st tier cities, 1st vs. 2nd tier, rural, etc. Still, I’ve never heard any of those markets described as more friendly to Western consumer brands than another Chinese market.
@Twofish
I don’t know about Citi and BoA, but AIG’s China presence is so tiny, it’s quite irrelevant: In life insurance, Q1 2009 market share has dropped below 1 % (it’s basically in free fall), and in non-life insurance, all foreign companies together barely have 1 % market-share.
Stimulus and massive deficit spending, leading to a weakly re-inflated bubble, are not the same as structural change. It’s just buying time.
Given China’s active moves in currency swaps and commodities investment, they seem to be preparing a stout defense against an inevitable second crash.
Taiwan’s export figures for April are pretty grim: -34.3 % overall, -33.7 % to US and -33.6 % to China and HK.
If China’s economy is indeed picking up, it is apparently managing to do so without ordering stuff from Taiwan.
Rapid global diversification of China’s trade. China replaces the United States as Brazil’s largest trading partner. Bye Bye US Global Economic and Dollar hegemony ….
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-05/05/content_11316255.htm
BRASILIA, May 4 (Xinhua) — China replaced the United States to become Brazil’s biggest trading partner, said Brazil’s Ministry of Development, Industry and Exterior Trade on Monday.
According to the trade balance released by the ministry, the sum of Brazil’s exports and imports with China reached 3.2 billion U.S. dollars in April, over the 2.8 billion dollars in its trade with the U.S.
Trade Minister Welber Barral said the change was “historic,” as the U.S. has been Brazil’s biggest trading partner since the 1930s.
According to Brazil’s official statistics, the bilateral trade volume between Brazil and China reached 36.44 billion dollars in 2008, increasing 55.9 percent from 2007, among which Brazil’s export volume to China hit 16.4 billion dollars, import volume 20 billion dollars, rising 50.8 percent and 56.9 percent from the previous year respectively.
However, Barral said that the Brazilian government is trying to diversify the exports to China, which till now are mainly soya, cellulose, fuel, and manufactured products.
Just Google “HiPhone” and you will realize why being profitable in the Chinese market is difficult from a consumers product perspective.
@Brad
I looked up the original press release made by the Korean government. Apparently, there was a big y-o-y increase in ship exports (+40 %, and the biggest category of all export goods).
I would argue this is not meaningful, because any ships that are delivered now were ordered long ago, and maybe it just so happened that April saw a lot of completions.
Many other categories don’t look so good:
Cars -42%
Semiconductors -26 %
Computers -44 %
Machinery -35 %
Checked March figures for comparison, and ships were also up big time yoy (even more in March than in April). The other categories I listed were somewhat worse in March, i.e. April did see some improvement.
But in any case, overall Korean exports in both March and April would be a lot weaker if it wasn’t for the “unusual” increase of ship deliveries.
thomas –thanks for the detailed data work
The CEO of Nordic Am Tanker, lessor of oil supertankers, recently told investors that daily supertanker rates have gone from 40K/day to under 10k/day. The excess tanker capacity is still being used to store excess above ground oil, waiting for someone to buy it.
Can’t imagine new orders for ships are happening.
I read the headline to this post and decided to cook some hollow greens with hot sauce. That and some ma pa tofu and I’m set for the night. Thanks!
Oh, on point, I find it interesting that calling the turn is such an obsession in the world. I assume that’s a function of the 24/7 news cycle, that we become more and more involved in minutiae. Did you see the Kentucky Derby? Around the first turn the winner was about 5 lengths behind the field and looked like a nag on the way to the glue factory. Where are we in this race? Not in the homestretch. My guess is somewhere past the first turn but I don’t see us as being very far into the backstretch. There’s a lot of race left.
Also, post Stress Test, I’ve begun to wonder about the Cabbage Gap.
How did we just go from the something like $2.7 Trillion in US banks losses estimated by Roubini and now the IMF…to $78 Billion in capital needed to withstand a worsening economy per the stress test results????
Looks like Roubini has been wondering about the Cabbage Gap as well and wrote a great big article about it.
http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/256694/ten_reasons_why_the_stress_tests_are_schmess_tests_and_why_the_current_muddle-through_approach_to_the_banking_crisis_may_not_succeed
it will succeed if the bank losses are not horridly worse than the stress tests say.
by the end of 2010 the banks’ books will be much cleaner, mainly because the bulk of the losses will have been taken by then. at that point it should be easy for the banks to raise private capital. what’s keeping private capital out of the system right now is fear — people are afraid that losses are going to be much deeper than expected, or people are afraid of a debt deflationary depression.
if we get past that, the banks should be able to raise a couple hundred billion in private capital if necessary, and then they will be well capitalized.
for instance bank of america’s market cap is 80B right now and an unencumbered BAC would be worth probably around 250B. they could easily raise 50B if they could convince people that after the raise their balance sheet would be clean. that will happen if there are no serious negative surprises in the next year or so.