<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minus twenty, minus twenty, minus twenty &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/05/13/minus-twenty-minus-twenty-minus-twenty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/05/13/minus-twenty-minus-twenty-minus-twenty/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Setser: Follow the Money &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Chinese puzzle: why is China growing with other export powerhouses aren&#8217;t?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/05/13/minus-twenty-minus-twenty-minus-twenty/#comment-131668</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Setser: Follow the Money &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Chinese puzzle: why is China growing with other export powerhouses aren&#8217;t?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5371#comment-131668</guid>
		<description>[...] a pickup in imports (and it clearly spurred auto sales). But China’s import data also suggest a quite sharp slowdown last fall, far larger than the slump in the official [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a pickup in imports (and it clearly spurred auto sales). But China’s import data also suggest a quite sharp slowdown last fall, far larger than the slump in the official [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geo-Graphics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; World Trade</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/05/13/minus-twenty-minus-twenty-minus-twenty/#comment-130568</link>
		<dc:creator>Geo-Graphics &#187; Blog Archive &#187; World Trade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5371#comment-130568</guid>
		<description>[...] Setser: Minus Twenty FT: World Trade Willis: U.S. Economy-Trade Gap Widens as Exports Decrease Gongloff: Can China’s Consumers Replaces the U.S.’s? Winning: Euro Zone Posts Trade Surplus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Setser: Minus Twenty FT: World Trade Willis: U.S. Economy-Trade Gap Widens as Exports Decrease Gongloff: Can China’s Consumers Replaces the U.S.’s? Winning: Euro Zone Posts Trade Surplus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/05/13/minus-twenty-minus-twenty-minus-twenty/#comment-130409</link>
		<dc:creator>DOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 01:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5371#comment-130409</guid>
		<description>Uncle Bill, Mental Widget,

Hong Kong’s labor data are here (http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hong_kong_statistics/statistical_tables/index.jsp?charsetID=1&amp;subjectID=2&amp;tableID=006), but they won’t tell you much about what’s happening in other parts of China.

= = = = = 

Howard Richman,
Chinese imports are an excellent indicator of what’s happening with Chinese exports. That’s about all, really. Not a good indicator of the domestic economy at all.

= = = = =

BSetser,
-21.3% in Dec, (Jan: CNY seasonality), -23.2% in Feb, -24.9% in Mar, -22.8% in Apr: Within the margin of error, there has been no improvement in China’s imports, just month after month of the same thing.

= = = = =

Cedric Regula,

As usual, China is shipping all those exports to Asia and Europe.
Percent Share of China’s Exports
 - - - - - - - - To Asia - - To Europe - - To USA
Q1 2008 - - - 48.9% - - - 24.3% - - - - - 18.9%
Q1 2009 - - - 48.7% - - - 22.7% - - - - - 20.2%

= = = = =

purple,

The problem with China-Japan trade data is that each side claims the other is running a large surplus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uncle Bill, Mental Widget,</p>
<p>Hong Kong’s labor data are here (<a href="http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hong_kong_statistics/statistical_tables/index.jsp?charsetID=1&#038;subjectID=2&#038;tableID=006" rel="nofollow">http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hong_kong_statistics/statistical_tables/index.jsp?charsetID=1&#038;subjectID=2&#038;tableID=006</a>), but they won’t tell you much about what’s happening in other parts of China.</p>
<p>= = = = = </p>
<p>Howard Richman,<br />
Chinese imports are an excellent indicator of what’s happening with Chinese exports. That’s about all, really. Not a good indicator of the domestic economy at all.</p>
<p>= = = = =</p>
<p>BSetser,<br />
-21.3% in Dec, (Jan: CNY seasonality), -23.2% in Feb, -24.9% in Mar, -22.8% in Apr: Within the margin of error, there has been no improvement in China’s imports, just month after month of the same thing.</p>
<p>= = = = =</p>
<p>Cedric Regula,</p>
<p>As usual, China is shipping all those exports to Asia and Europe.<br />
Percent Share of China’s Exports<br />
 &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; - To Asia &#8211; - To Europe &#8211; - To USA<br />
Q1 2008 &#8211; - &#8211; 48.9% &#8211; - &#8211; 24.3% &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; 18.9%<br />
Q1 2009 &#8211; - &#8211; 48.7% &#8211; - &#8211; 22.7% &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; 20.2%</p>
<p>= = = = =</p>
<p>purple,</p>
<p>The problem with China-Japan trade data is that each side claims the other is running a large surplus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purple</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/05/13/minus-twenty-minus-twenty-minus-twenty/#comment-130358</link>
		<dc:creator>purple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 08:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5371#comment-130358</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;In the not so distant future, while per capita income will likely never catch up to the West due to its billion plus population, China will soon regain its historic economic position as the World Largest Economy from 1200-1900 AD.&lt;/i&gt;

China should worry about getting its per-cap GDP (PPP) significantly higher than heavyweights like Angola and Egypt before it worries about the West.

Growing inequality between the coastal and interior regions (where few Westerners go) is a very real threat to the central government&#039;s authority - as it has been throughout history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>In the not so distant future, while per capita income will likely never catch up to the West due to its billion plus population, China will soon regain its historic economic position as the World Largest Economy from 1200-1900 AD.</i></p>
<p>China should worry about getting its per-cap GDP (PPP) significantly higher than heavyweights like Angola and Egypt before it worries about the West.</p>
<p>Growing inequality between the coastal and interior regions (where few Westerners go) is a very real threat to the central government&#8217;s authority &#8211; as it has been throughout history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purple</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/05/13/minus-twenty-minus-twenty-minus-twenty/#comment-130356</link>
		<dc:creator>purple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 07:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5371#comment-130356</guid>
		<description>One can also look at Japan&#039;s export data to China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One can also look at Japan&#8217;s export data to China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inflatione/deflation - Boligdebatten.dk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/05/13/minus-twenty-minus-twenty-minus-twenty/#comment-130280</link>
		<dc:creator>inflatione/deflation - Boligdebatten.dk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5371#comment-130280</guid>
		<description>[...] man kan supplerer med et indl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] man kan supplerer med et indl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Billy, Mental Widget</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/05/13/minus-twenty-minus-twenty-minus-twenty/#comment-130279</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Billy, Mental Widget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 06:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5371#comment-130279</guid>
		<description>Twofish: Thankyou -- he focuses in on the migrant workers which is informative, and notes  a few times that he doesn&#039;t think they will take to the streets.  I was thinking that there might be some central registry for their unemployed.  Maybe as the rfid cards become more widely used they will begin to track this (though I imagine the rest of the world would get a very distorted view of true  levels of employment).  Does anyone know if Hong Kong has been hit as hard as Manhattan, labor-wise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twofish: Thankyou &#8212; he focuses in on the migrant workers which is informative, and notes  a few times that he doesn&#8217;t think they will take to the streets.  I was thinking that there might be some central registry for their unemployed.  Maybe as the rfid cards become more widely used they will begin to track this (though I imagine the rest of the world would get a very distorted view of true  levels of employment).  Does anyone know if Hong Kong has been hit as hard as Manhattan, labor-wise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Additional Reflections on the March Trade Release</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/05/13/minus-twenty-minus-twenty-minus-twenty/#comment-130278</link>
		<dc:creator>Additional Reflections on the March Trade Release</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 06:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5371#comment-130278</guid>
		<description>[...] year-on-year rate is -15.4%. So here, I&#8217;m in agreement with Brad Setser&#8217;s observations [1], [2] &#8212; trade has collapsed and there&#8217;s little evidence that there&#8217;s an incipient [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year-on-year rate is -15.4%. So here, I&#8217;m in agreement with Brad Setser&#8217;s observations [1], [2] &#8212; trade has collapsed and there&#8217;s little evidence that there&#8217;s an incipient [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Additional Reflections on the March Trade Release &#124; Economist Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/05/13/minus-twenty-minus-twenty-minus-twenty/#comment-130276</link>
		<dc:creator>Additional Reflections on the March Trade Release &#124; Economist Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 02:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5371#comment-130276</guid>
		<description>[...] year-on-year rate is -15.4%. So here, I&#8217;m in agreement with Brad Setser&#8217;s observations [1], [2] &#8212; trade has collapsed and there&#8217;s little evidence that there&#8217;s an incipient [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year-on-year rate is -15.4%. So here, I&#8217;m in agreement with Brad Setser&#8217;s observations [1], [2] &#8212; trade has collapsed and there&#8217;s little evidence that there&#8217;s an incipient [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Additional Reflections on the March Trade Release &#124; 1800blogger</title>
		<link>http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/05/13/minus-twenty-minus-twenty-minus-twenty/#comment-130274</link>
		<dc:creator>Additional Reflections on the March Trade Release &#124; 1800blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 02:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5371#comment-130274</guid>
		<description>[...] year-on-year rate is -15.4%. So here, I&#8217;m in agreement with Brad Setser&#8217;s observations [1], [2] &#8212; trade has collapsed and there&#8217;s little evidence that there&#8217;s an incipient [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year-on-year rate is -15.4%. So here, I&#8217;m in agreement with Brad Setser&#8217;s observations [1], [2] &#8212; trade has collapsed and there&#8217;s little evidence that there&#8217;s an incipient [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

