Comments on: Three quick points on the April TIC data http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/06/15/three-quick-points-on-the-april-tic-data/ Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:09:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: China Sells Treasuries… or Did They? | Daily Finance News - Forex Stock Market http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/06/15/three-quick-points-on-the-april-tic-data/#comment-135604 China Sells Treasuries… or Did They? | Daily Finance News - Forex Stock Market Wed, 13 Oct 2010 01:46:51 +0000 http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5652#comment-135604 [...] and his blog Follow the Money (he left blogging when he went to work for the White House). As he detailed back in the summer: China tends to account for a very large share of purchases through the [...] [...] and his blog Follow the Money (he left blogging when he went to work for the White House). As he detailed back in the summer: China tends to account for a very large share of purchases through the [...]

]]> By: 中国がTreasury を売る。。。。いや売った？ « シカゴ便 http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/06/15/three-quick-points-on-the-april-tic-data/#comment-134839 中国がTreasury を売る。。。。いや売った？ « シカゴ便 Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:37:39 +0000 http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5652#comment-134839 [...] ここがBrad Setser（White Houseで働くためにブログをやめた：Brad Setser: Follow the Money）が去年の夏に細かく書いているところであるThree quick points on the April TIC data [...] [...] ここがBrad Setser（White Houseで働くためにブログをやめた：Brad Setser: Follow the Money）が去年の夏に細かく書いているところであるThree quick points on the April TIC data [...]

]]> By: Photomaniacal » Blog Archive » China Sells Treasuries… or Did They? http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/06/15/three-quick-points-on-the-april-tic-data/#comment-134837 Photomaniacal » Blog Archive » China Sells Treasuries… or Did They? Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:14:06 +0000 http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5652#comment-134837 [...] and his blog Follow the Money (he left blogging when he went to work for the White House). As he detailed back in the summer: China tends to account for a very large share of purchases through the [...] [...] and his blog Follow the Money (he left blogging when he went to work for the White House). As he detailed back in the summer: China tends to account for a very large share of purchases through the [...]

]]> By: Three quick points on the April TIC data | Mortgage Loans Equity .Net - Home Mortgage, Home Loans, Home Equity & Mortgage refinancing http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/06/15/three-quick-points-on-the-april-tic-data/#comment-132606 Three quick points on the April TIC data | Mortgage Loans Equity .Net - Home Mortgage, Home Loans, Home Equity & Mortgage refinancing Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:50:58 +0000 http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5652#comment-132606 [...] Read more here - Three quick points on the April TIC data [...] [...] Read more here – Three quick points on the April TIC data [...]

]]> By: yoda http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/06/15/three-quick-points-on-the-april-tic-data/#comment-132182 yoda Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:28:28 +0000 http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5652#comment-132182 China wants weak currency? you are delusional. China wants a stable currency not a weak currency. check Forex before talking non sense. China wants weak currency? you are delusional. China wants a stable currency not a weak currency. check Forex before talking non sense.

]]> By: China, Japan and Russia were net SELLERS of US Treasuries last week! (TBT, TLT) | Market Addicts http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/06/15/three-quick-points-on-the-april-tic-data/#comment-132125 China, Japan and Russia were net SELLERS of US Treasuries last week! (TBT, TLT) | Market Addicts Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:29:13 +0000 http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5652#comment-132125 [...]  Chart: http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/20.....-tic-data/ [...] [...]  Chart: http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/20…..-tic-data/ [...]

]]> By: Treasury TIC Data For April ‘09 http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/06/15/three-quick-points-on-the-april-tic-data/#comment-132101 Treasury TIC Data For April ‘09 Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:19:39 +0000 http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5652#comment-132101 [...] modest.” Mr. Setser, among other points, makes a quick note about China’s T-holdings. From CFR: After adjusting for China’s purchases through the UK, I would guess that China’s total [...] [...] modest.” Mr. Setser, among other points, makes a quick note about China’s T-holdings. From CFR: After adjusting for China’s purchases through the UK, I would guess that China’s total [...]

]]> By: locococo http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/06/15/three-quick-points-on-the-april-tic-data/#comment-132073 locococo Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:29:46 +0000 http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5652#comment-132073 In fact the big q looking for an answer is - what happens when some day it stops? In fact the big q looking for an answer is – what happens when some day it stops?

]]> By: locococo http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/06/15/three-quick-points-on-the-april-tic-data/#comment-132072 locococo Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:25:10 +0000 http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5652#comment-132072 Nevertheless it did so and it continues to do so ... Nevertheless it did so and it continues to do so …

]]> By: WStroupe http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2009/06/15/three-quick-points-on-the-april-tic-data/#comment-132070 WStroupe Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:04:53 +0000 http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/?p=5652#comment-132070 a, If the U.S. Treasury cynically defaulted only on Treasuries denominated in foreign currencies it would be a most transparent power play that would without question get a tremendous backlash. The U.S. is already wounded on the world stage. Would it risk such a backlash, which could come in many very costly forms, far outside the financial arena? I doubt it. Besides, when you're the U.S. Treasury, you can't count on maintaining vital international confidence if you just end up playing a 'confidence game', and that's what your suggesting the Treasury would/could do. I don't think it could do so. a,

If the U.S. Treasury cynically defaulted only on Treasuries denominated in foreign currencies it would be a most transparent power play that would without question get a tremendous backlash. The U.S. is already wounded on the world stage. Would it risk such a backlash, which could come in many very costly forms, far outside the financial arena? I doubt it. Besides, when you’re the U.S. Treasury, you can’t count on maintaining vital international confidence if you just end up playing a ‘confidence game’, and that’s what your suggesting the Treasury would/could do. I don’t think it could do so.

]]>