CFR Presents

Women Around the World

CFR experts analyze women’s advancement globally.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


Tackling Barriers to Women’s Economic Participation

by Rachel Vogelstein
January 4, 2016

Woman-cocoa-Africa-farming-finance N'da Yao Messou, 48, president of a local cocoa farmers association called BLAYEYA, works in a cocoa farm in Djangobo, Niable in eastern Ivory Coast. BLAYEYA is a women's association with each member owning a field and planting cocoa. REUTERS/Thierry Gouegnon


In 2016, the connection between women’s economic participation and prosperity is undeniable.  Decades of research from the International Monetary FundOrganisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, the World Economic Forum, and other leading organizations confirms that women’s participation in the labor force is critical to economic growth. Yet, despite this evidence, a range of legal barriers inhibiting women’s full and equal economic participation remains on the books in countries around the world.

The World Bank’s 2016 report on Women, Business and the Law offers a stark picture of the ways in which laws and policies continue to undermine women’s economic productivity. Of the 173 economies surveyed, 90 percent have at least one regulation on the books that impedes women’s economic opportunities. Gender-based job restrictions remain common: about 100 countries impose limitations on the jobs that women can hold. In thirty economies, women face a constellation of barriers, with ten or more laws inhibiting women’s economic participation on the books, and in eighteen countries, husbands or male guardians can legally prevent women from working altogether. These obstacles have a multidimensional effect of women’s opportunities: lower levels of gender equality in national laws are associated with fewer girls attending secondary school, fewer women in the formal workforce or running businesses, and a wider gender wage gap.

These legal barriers matter, of course, because they undermine women’s rights and self-sufficiency. But given that these restrictions stifle broader economic growth, it is not only human rights advocates who should care about these limitations—finance ministers should also take note. Indeed, the private sector has increasingly recognized the growth potential afforded by women’s economic participation: just last month, McKinsey Global Institute released a study assessing the potential gain of women’s equal workforce participation at $28 trillion globally, or 26 percent of annual global gross domestic product (GDP), if the gap between women and men were to close by 2025. Notably, the study highlighted that advanced and developing countries alike stand to gain, but these gains would materialize only in a “full potential” scenario in which women had identical access to labor markets as their male counterparts.

In recent years, government leaders have begun to eliminate barriers to women’s economic participation. According to the Bank, over the past two years alone, sixty-five economies—the vast majority in the developing world—enacted legal reforms to boost the economic contributions of women. But as the Bank report outlines, much more work remains to level the economic playing field between women and men. As 2016 dawns, no region in the world can claim to have achieved gender equality in economic opportunity. This hampers profits and productivity in every corner of the world.

Importantly, international momentum in favor of reforms to promote women’s economic participation is growing. The new Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) recently adopted at the United Nations include concrete targets to improve women’s economic activity, calling for equality in property ownership, inheritance, financial services, and natural resources. The SDGs also address a range of factors—from ending violence against women, to recognizing unpaid care and domestic work, to promoting equal participation in leadership and decision-making—that are critical for women to realize their economic potential. As nations move from adoption to implementation of these new targets, development practitioners should enlist the support of economic leaders and policymakers to enact the reforms needed to unleash the full economic contributions of women and strengthen economies across the globe.

Listen to the audio of the CFR roundtable event Legal Barriers to Economic Participation>>

Post a Comment 2 Comments

  • Posted by Josephine Trueman

    I do agree that women need to be given an opportunity to participate in economic development and as one saying goes in Africa and may be many more continents, “Educate a woman and you have educated the whole village”. I come from Africa and married to an American. Their is a very big gap of how women are empowered economically in the U.S. versus in Africa. To be very specific, In Africa, as a woman, you have to be either arrogant or have a “God Father’ for you to break through in many ways, and especially economically. So in Africa, women still need a lot of support by the law enforcement system to raise up economically.

    In the U.S, I feel that the law enforcement to protect women against forms of abuse is quite advanced – except a few cases. The only challenge is that people have been socialized to believe that men are the bread winners and this leaves qualified women with untapped great business skills. I think and suggest that for families that have small children, if you discover that the woman is gifted in business, I recommend that the man takes the full responsibility to take care of the children and the woman can be given a chance to be the major bread winner.

    In summary, as much as I do support women empowerment, I am also a great supporter balancing time spend at work and time spend with children at home. While we are working hard to empower women, let us not leave the children unattended or in child cares.

  • Posted by Amine

    Can You write a summarising of This passage

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required