Micah Zenko

Politics, Power, and Preventive Action

Zenko covers the U.S. national security debate and offers insight on developments in international security and conflict prevention.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


The Death of Qaddafi

by Micah Zenko
October 20, 2011

Residents celebrate at Martyrs square in Tripoli October 20, 2011 after hearing the news that former leader Muammar Gaddafi was killed in Sirte (Ismail Zetouni/Courtesy Reuters).

Residents celebrate at Martyrs square in Tripoli October 20, 2011 after hearing the news that former leader Muammar Gaddafi was killed in Sirte (Ismail Zetouni/Courtesy Reuters).

On the second evening of the NATO-led intervention into Libya, British cruise missiles were launched, striking Muammar Qaddafi’s Bab al-Azizia compound in Tripoli. Although the stated military objective of the attack was to disrupt the “command and control” of loyalist forces, the intention was to kill Qaddafi in an attempt to quickly resolve the civil war. The day prior, British defense minister Liam Fox was asked if Qaddafi was a “legitimate target,” to which he responded vaguely that attacking the Libyan leader would “potentially be a possibility.”

Over the course of the conflict, allied cruise missiles and aircraft unsuccessfully attempted to kill Qaddafi dozens of times. Earlier today, however, in the violent, culminating moment of the protracted civil war, he was finally struck down in the loyalist holdout of Sirte. According to French Defense Minister Gérard Longuet, Qaddafi was killed in a convoy of vehicles attempting to flee Sirte after the city was overtaken by rebel forces. A U.S. Predator drone allegedly fired on the convoy, after which rebel fighters on the ground captured the vehicle carrying Qaddafi. (Even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, a NATO spokesperson stated: “It is important to stress that Nato does not target individuals.”) A video reportedly taken from Sirte shows what appears to be a wounded Qaddafi under the control of armed men, which suggests that he was captured alive and summarily executed.

If nothing else, Qaddafi’s death—presumably by the unidentified armed men—reconfirms the difficulty of killing leaders with stand-off airpower. The United States tried to kill Osama Bin Laden in August 1998 with cruise missiles; he died by a bullet to the head in May 2011. The United States fired cruise missiles into the bedroom of Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic’s personal residence in Belgrade in April 1999; he died in a jail cell seven years later from a heart attack. On March 19, 2003, American F-117s dropped four 2,000-pound bombs on the Dora Farms complex where Saddam Hussein was believed to be hiding; he died by a noose in December 2006.

The death of the world’s longest serving dictator could serve as a turning point for the establishment of a unified political order in Libya by unequivocally ending the uncertainty that Qaddafi could ever return to power. For the many victims of his brutal reign in Libya and acts of international terrorism, perhaps his death will provide a sense of justice and retribution.

For the United States and NATO, they have finally achieved the intended, if unidentified strategic objective from the outset of the intervention: Qaddafi’s death.

Post a Comment 2 Comments

  • Posted by Javed Mir

    A Painful Scene

    He ruled libya singlehandedly for more four decades, controlled and misused resources of the country, never thought for initiating and strengthening the democratic institutions, could not reconcile himself with the truth that power emanating from the people is everlasting and at long last had an ignominious death.

    However, the dragging of the dead body was a painful scene and that dead body was the body of Muammar Qaddafi.

    This is a lesson for those oligarchic and dynastic rulers who do not have the vision that the present century is the century of the people. The people should have ultimate authority to develop their destinies.

  • Posted by Peter Duveen

    Muammar Qaddafi died, if reports are accurate, armed and in military fatigues. He died a soldier in service to his country. The Libyan armed forces (not to be confused with the “rebel” forces) were dressed in army uniforms in keeping with international law, unlike the “rebels,” who could not be distinguished from civilians.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required