Micah Zenko

Politics, Power, and Preventive Action

Zenko covers the U.S. national security debate and offers insight on developments in international security and conflict prevention.

Print Print Email Email Share Share Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close

loading...

Who Is Ultimately Responsible for U.S. Drone Strikes?

by Micah Zenko
March 5, 2013

Tribesmen gather at a site of a suspected drone strike on the outskirts of Miranshah, Pakistan, near the Afghan border in October 2008 (Haji Mujtaba/Courtesy Reuters). Tribesmen gather at a site of a suspected drone strike on the outskirts of Miranshah, Pakistan, near the Afghan border in October 2008 (Haji Mujtaba/Courtesy Reuters).

An article today in the New York Times offered a new piece of evidence in the CIA’s nine-year drone strikes campaign in Pakistan. Declan Walsh reported that anonymous officials—“two senior U.S. officials” and a “third official”—claimed that airstrikes on February 6 and 8, reported by Pakistani and international media as drone strikes, were not actually conducted by the United States. According to one of the sources: “They were not ours. We haven’t had any kinetic activity since January.” An official is also quoted as assigning responsibility to the “Pakistani military…the Taliban fighting among themselves. Or it could have been simply bad reporting.”

There were a number of plausible and implausible denials and claims during the early years of the drone strikes in Pakistan. After the very first CIA drone strike killed Nek Mohammed on June 17, 2004, a Pakistani military spokesperson claimed: “Our security forces acted swiftly on the information and that is how he was killed.” Likewise, after the May 8, 2005, attack that killed Haitham al-Yemeni, a Pakistani official simultaneously denied the event took place and claimed that it might have happened in Afghanistan.

Finally, on December 1, 2005, missiles killed Abu Hamza Rabia, a senior al-Qaeda official, in the village of Haisori (an attack three weeks prior missed him, but reportedly killed his wife and daughter). However, the Pakistani government claimed Rabia blew himself up experimenting with explosives. After freelance journalist Hayatullah Khan published a story that included photographs of shrapnel bearing the Hellfire missile’s designation “AGM-114” and the words “guided missile,” it became clear that Pakistani intelligence officials likely authorized his abduction and murder. The State Department’s 2006 Country Report on Human Rights Practices for Pakistan described the Khan murder delicately, indirectly implicating Pakistani officials while denying the existence of the CIA’s Predator drones:

“Colleagues suspected that authorities detained Khan after he contradicted a government report that the senior leader died when munitions exploded inside a house. Khan quoted local tribesmen as saying the house was hit by a missile fired from an aircraft.”

Of course, that aircraft was American (although the State Department pointedly omitted the photographs), and Hayatullah Khan was murdered by the government of Pakistan for his reporting.

The practice of shifting blame and responsibility has also been a defining feature of the targeted killing program in Yemen. A leaked State Department cable that summarized a January 2010 meeting between President Ali Abdullah Saleh and General David Petraeus, commander of U.S. Central Command, described President Saleh lamenting U.S. cruise missile attacks, while declaring: “We’ll continue saying the bombs are ours, not yours.” In December, journalist Sudarsan Raghavan further revealed “the Yemeni government’s efforts to conceal Washington’s mistakes and the unintended consequences of civilian deaths in American air assaults” by hiding civilian casualties and insisting that U.S. drone strikes were conducted by its own military combat jets.

The Yemeni government’s efforts complement nicely with how the State Department 2011 Country Reports for Human Rights Practices described “killings” by Yemen:

“The government also employed air strikes against AQAP and affiliated insurgents in Abyan, with some strikes hitting civilian areas. Although some accused the government of intentionally striking civilians in Abyan, most if not all noncombatant casualties from these bombardments were attributed to a lack of air force training and technical capability.”

It is possible that some of these air strikes were carried out by CIA or Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) drones, or even offshore U.S. Navy assets. Given that the State Department would not acknowledge the U.S. role or responsibility for targeted killings in Pakistan, why would they do so in Yemen? Moreover, it is hard to imagine that civilians on the ground are able to distinguish clearly between Yemeni, Saudi Arabian, CIA, and JSOC missiles.

Finally, journalist Mark Mazzetti also reported in June: “According to three current and former intelligence officials I spoke to, in 2006, a barrage of Hellfire missiles from a Predator hit a suspected militant camp in the jungles of the Philippines, in an attempt to kill the Indonesian terrorist Umar Patek.” Soon after, a spokesperson for the Philippines Armed Forces denied that drone strike had ever occurred, stating: “That’s against the law. The United States does not participate in [actual] military operations here in the Philippines.” A U.S. special operations officer deployed  to the Joint Special Operations Task Force-Philippines revealed that he had no knowledge of any U.S. drone strikes, although he also admitted that he never had direct access into whatever “other government agencies” [i.e., the CIA] were doing.

What is most remarkable about today’s story is that the United States still maintains the myth that there is no targeted killing program in Pakistan, as CIA drone strikes are covert actions—“where it is intended that the role of the United States Government will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly.” Since President Obama acknowledged in January 2012 that the United States is conducting drone strikes in Pakistan, maintaining this demonstrable falsehood is absurd. As is selectively speaking to reporters off the record to disavow American responsibility for two out of an estimated 364 drone strikes.

UPDATE: As of 12:30 p.m. this afternoon, the Pakistani military media arm released a statement denying involvement in the two strikes as well.)

Post a Comment 3 Comments

  • Posted by shawn riddick

    What gives the USA the right to kill anyone on earth? At least 180 children have been killed by US drones. What is the purpose of killing these people? America now has the largest prison population and industry in all of human history. The Land of the Free are truely hollow words. Courage is a hollow word in America. Clearly Evil and Insanity would desribe the policies of our goverment very well. The CIA has signed secrecy agreements and pacts allowing safe harbour for satanic alien bases under our soil. I know this for fact and was asked to sign a secrecy agreement also. Please read warningfromgod and find out why our leadership is insane and evil. Retribution is in God’s hands. Survival is in yours.

  • Posted by Phil

    I can’t believe I’ve come full circle on the CFR – originally I assumed you guys were all closet hawks, and God knows most of you were – as it turns out there’s some sane heads between you. I’d watch your backs ‘sane heads’ : ) – it took 50 years to set the grain in one direction – those that go against it no matter how respected their work is usually represent a ‘blip’ against the grain – against the vastly complex and uncontrollably compartmentalized machine which is the M.I.C. Remember your opinions risk the fortunes of Rising Giants such as General Atomics Aeronautical Systems – GA have so far built 360 MQ-1 Predators for the US military at 4 million dollars a pop ! Do the math. Add to that: 60 MQ-9 Reapers – at 36 Million dollars a pop !!! Now we’re warmin up – that’s a total of approx 14 BILLION form the US military. Their WHOLE BUSINESS depends entirely on public opinion!!! Public opinion, votes!! readers of articles… like us control the future spending options of the US military! GA have absolutely planned financially for a guaranteed growth in their Drone business. They NEED articles like this to be ignored and side stepped by mainstream media. GA are verrrry lucky Congressman Paul’s filibuster happened before they go public because their stock would have taken a 20 point hit that day ! Big Powers in play here – a LOT of green is in the game already !

  • Posted by Get the facts

    Way cool! Some extremely valid points! I appreciate you writing this
    write-up plus the rest of the site is also very good.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required

Pingbacks