Micah Zenko

Politics, Power, and Preventive Action

Zenko covers the U.S. national security debate and offers insight on developments in international security and conflict prevention.

Print Print Cite Cite
Style: MLA APA Chicago Close


How Many Bombs Did the United States Drop in 2016?

by Micah Zenko
January 5, 2017

Obama Biden Dunford U.S. President Barack Obama attends a military full honor review farewell ceremony given in his honor, accompanied by Vice President Joe Biden (C) and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford (L) at Joint Base Myer-Henderson in Washington, U.S. January 4, 2017. (Barria/Reuters).


This blog post was coauthored with my research associate, Jennifer Wilson

[Note: This post was updated to reflect an additional strike in Yemen in 2016, announced by U.S. Central Command on January 12, 2017.]

As President Obama enters the final weeks of his presidency, there will be ample assessments of his foreign military approach, which has focused on reducing U.S. ground combat troops (with the notable exception of the Afghanistan surge), supporting local security partners, and authorizing the expansive use of air power. Whether this strategy “works”—i.e. reduces the threat posed by extremists operating from those countries and improves overall security and governance on the ground—is highly contested. Yet, for better or worse, these are the central tenets of the Obama doctrine.

In President Obama’s last year in office, the United States dropped 26,172 bombs in seven countries. This estimate is undoubtedly low, considering reliable data is only available for airstrikes in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and Libya, and a single “strike,” according to the Pentagon’s definition, can involve multiple bombs or munitions. In 2016, the United States dropped 3,028 more bombs—and in one more country, Libya—than in 2015.

Most (24,287) were dropped in Iraq and Syria. This number is based on the percentage of total coalition airstrikes carried out in 2016 by the United States in Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR), the counter-Islamic State campaign. The Pentagon publishes a running count of bombs dropped by the United States and its partners, and we found data for 2016 using OIR public strike releases and this handy tool.* Using this data, we found that in 2016, the United States conducted about 79 percent (5,904) of the coalition airstrikes in Iraq and Syria, which together total 7,473. Of the total 30,743 bombs that the coalition dropped, then, the United States dropped 24,287 (79 percent of 30,743).

To determine how many U.S. bombs were dropped on each Iraq and Syria, we looked at the percentage of total U.S. OIR airstrikes conducted in each country. They were nearly evenly split, with 49.8 percent (or 2,941 airstrikes) carried out in Iraq, and 50.2 percent (or 2,963 airstrikes) in Syria. Therefore, the number of bombs dropped were also nearly the same in the two countries (12,095 in Iraq; 12,192 in Syria). Last year, the United States conducted approximately 67 percent of airstrikes in Iraq in 2016, and 96 percent of those in Syria.

Sources: Estimate based upon Combined Forces Air Component Commander 2011-2016 Airpower Statistics; CJTF-Operation Inherent Resolve Public Affairs Office strike release, December 31, 2016; New America (NA); Long War Journal (LWJ); The Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ); Department of Defense press release; and U.S. Africa Command press release.

*Our data is based on OIR totals between January 10, 2016 and December 31, 2016

Post a Comment 48 Comments

  • Posted by Henry
  • Posted by Ak47

    probably all those killed in those strike were not in the name of eliminating terror and even if they were, how can u prove that the terrorists were not created by the US?

  • Posted by Ed IN Colorado

    Oblamer and his bombings were a day late and a dollar short… They were mostly useless and in areas that really did nothing..

    Trump released guided missiles and MOAB…. more bang for the buck… Oblamer ia a failure as an American, a President, and a Man…

  • Posted by Me

    This actually proves that US forces are worse compared to the terrorists. Terrorist usually kill 50-100 people in an incident and when this happens, all the press is filled with details on how they took the lives of innocent people. 100% correct, but lets look first at what we do (throw tens of thousands of bombs on mostly innocent people – don’t think all inhahabitant of the countries that USA bombed are terrorists) and then, after making sure we stop any military action in those “unstable countries”, then if the terrorists still kill innocent people in our country, we can safely say that they are worth it.
    But, as I see it now, USA wants to have power over countries with big oil resources, try to scare those countries and naturally, some mercenaries from there will try to, justified or not, take revenge. If USA would stay in its bench and mind its own business inside its borders, everything would be better.

  • Posted by James Aschenbach

    all of you playing politician and commander are moronic idiots with blind faith in a failure of a human being.

    Comparisons for manhood over accuracy of bombings is literally retarded.

  • Posted by Douglas Wissing

    The question with these bombings, including MOAB, is whether they are consequential and relevant—or futile. There is significant data to indicate the widespread bombings are inflaming anti-American insurgencies.

Post a Comment

CFR seeks to foster civil and informed discussion of foreign policy issues. Opinions expressed on CFR blogs are solely those of the author or commenter, not of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. All comments must abide by CFR's guidelines and will be moderated prior to posting.

* Required